Ubuntu
scrollkeeper package

package gucharmap 1:2.21.3-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 134

Bug #179084 reported by k1dugar on 2007-12-28

This bug report is a duplicate of: Bug #218049: scrollkeeper-update failed with "corrupted double-linked list" during update-manager update . Edit Remove

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	scrollkeeper (Ubuntu)	Incomplete	Undecided	Craig Maloney

(?)

Bug Description

Binary package hint: gucharmap

While installing ubuntu studio and updating on existing ubuntu.

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri Dec 28 15:53:54 2007
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04
ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 134
Package: gucharmap 1:2.21.3-0ubuntu1
PackageArchitecture: i386
SourcePackage: gucharmap
Title: package gucharmap 1:2.21.3-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 134
Uname: Linux localhost 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP Sun Oct 14 23:05:12 GMT 2007 i686 GNU/Linux

Tags: Edit Tag help

k1dugar (k1dugar) wrote on 2007-12-28:

Dependencies.txt Edit (4.1 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
DpkgTerminalLog.txt Edit (101.8 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")

Craig Maloney (craig-decafbad) wrote on 2008-03-03:

Possibly related bugs: bug 147184, bug 178799, bug 179084, bug 181336, bug 183487, bug 186777, bug 187817, and bug 187821

Changed in scrollkeeper:
assignee:	nobody → craig-decafbad
status:	New → Incomplete

Craig Maloney (craig-decafbad) wrote on 2008-03-03:

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please try to obtain a backtrace following the instructions at [WWW] http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash and upload the backtrace (as an attachment) to the bug report. This will greatly help us in tracking down your problem, as well as the other related problems.

Also, are you running this upgrade on a single core, multiple core, or virtual machine?

Kjell Braden (afflux) wrote on 2008-06-05:

This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 218049, so it is being marked as such. Please note that any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Feel free to continue to report any other bugs you may find.