Stumpwm fails to compile (compiles on other versions of sbcl)
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
sbcl (Ubuntu) |
Won't Fix
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Binary package hint: sbcl
The latest version of stumpwm fails to compile with 11.04's sbcl. It will compile with 10.10's version of sbcl as well as the latest version of sbcl compiled from source on 11.04. The relevant part of the compilation output seems to be:
; --> LET XLIB::WITH-BUFFER MACROLET LET XLIB::HOLDING-LOCK
; --> SB-THREAD:
; --> MULTIPLE-
; --> XLIB::WITH-
; --> XLIB::BUFFER-
; --> LDB SB-KERNEL:%LDB
; ==>
; (LOGAND (ASH INT (- SB-C::POSN)) (ASH 4294967295 (- SB-C::SIZE 32)))
;
; note: forced to do static-fun Two-arg-and (cost 53)
; unable to do inline fixnum arithmetic (cost 1) because:
; The first argument is a INTEGER, not a FIXNUM.
; unable to do inline fixnum arithmetic (cost 2) because:
; The first argument is a INTEGER, not a FIXNUM.
; etc.
debugger invoked on a SB-INT:BUG in thread #<THREAD "initial thread" RUNNING
failed AVER: (AND (NULL (TN-READS TN)) (NULL (TN-WRITES TN)))
This is probably a bug in SBCL itself. (Alternatively, SBCL might have been
corrupted by bad user code, e.g. by an undefined Lisp operation like
(FMAKUNBOUND 'COMPILE), or by stray pointers from alien code or from unsafe
Lisp code; or there might be a bug in the OS or hardware that SBCL is running
on.) If it seems to be a bug in SBCL itself, the maintainers would like to
know about it. Bug reports are welcome on the SBCL mailing lists, which you
can find at <http://
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: sbcl 1:1.0.40.0-2
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Jun 9 23:02:59 2011
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=en_US:en
PATH=(custom, no user)
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: sbcl
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-05-21 (19 days ago)
Changed in sbcl (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
Changed in sbcl (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | nobody → rosa maria (rprosamaria383) |
Changed in sbcl (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | rosa maria (rprosamaria383) → nobody |
I fear it might be too late to just get a (hopefully working) 1.0.52 from unstable? Can you test whether https:/ /launchpad. net/~christoph- egger/+ archive/ ppa/+sourcepub/ 1977637/ +listing- archive- extra from my ppa fixes the issue for you (that's the same source uploaded to debian unstable as well)