Stumpwm fails to compile (compiles on other versions of sbcl)

Bug #795368 reported by Jay Belanger
18
This bug affects 3 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
sbcl (Ubuntu)
Won't Fix
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: sbcl

The latest version of stumpwm fails to compile with 11.04's sbcl. It will compile with 10.10's version of sbcl as well as the latest version of sbcl compiled from source on 11.04. The relevant part of the compilation output seems to be:

; --> LET XLIB::WITH-BUFFER MACROLET LET XLIB::HOLDING-LOCK
; --> SB-THREAD:WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK SB-INT:DX-FLET FLET BLOCK
; --> MULTIPLE-VALUE-PROG1 XLIB::WITHOUT-ABORTS PROGN
; --> XLIB::WITH-BUFFER-REQUEST-INTERNAL XLIB::WITH-BUFFER-OUTPUT LET LET*
; --> XLIB::BUFFER-NEW-REQUEST-NUMBER BLOCK SETF LET* MULTIPLE-VALUE-BIND LET
; --> LDB SB-KERNEL:%LDB
; ==>
; (LOGAND (ASH INT (- SB-C::POSN)) (ASH 4294967295 (- SB-C::SIZE 32)))
;
; note: forced to do static-fun Two-arg-and (cost 53)
; unable to do inline fixnum arithmetic (cost 1) because:
; The first argument is a INTEGER, not a FIXNUM.
; unable to do inline fixnum arithmetic (cost 2) because:
; The first argument is a INTEGER, not a FIXNUM.
; etc.

debugger invoked on a SB-INT:BUG in thread #<THREAD "initial thread" RUNNING
                                             {AB638D1}>:
    failed AVER: (AND (NULL (TN-READS TN)) (NULL (TN-WRITES TN)))
  This is probably a bug in SBCL itself. (Alternatively, SBCL might have been
  corrupted by bad user code, e.g. by an undefined Lisp operation like
  (FMAKUNBOUND 'COMPILE), or by stray pointers from alien code or from unsafe
  Lisp code; or there might be a bug in the OS or hardware that SBCL is running
  on.) If it seems to be a bug in SBCL itself, the maintainers would like to
  know about it. Bug reports are welcome on the SBCL mailing lists, which you
  can find at <http://sbcl.sourceforge.net/>.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: sbcl 1:1.0.40.0-2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Jun 9 23:02:59 2011
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US:en
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: sbcl
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-05-21 (19 days ago)

Revision history for this message
Jay Belanger (belanger-0) wrote :
Changed in sbcl (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Christoph Egger (christoph-egger) wrote :

I fear it might be too late to just get a (hopefully working) 1.0.52 from unstable? Can you test whether https://launchpad.net/~christoph-egger/+archive/ppa/+sourcepub/1977637/+listing-archive-extra from my ppa fixes the issue for you (that's the same source uploaded to debian unstable as well)

Changed in sbcl (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → rosa maria (rprosamaria383)
dobey (dobey)
Changed in sbcl (Ubuntu):
assignee: rosa maria (rprosamaria383) → nobody
Revision history for this message
Logan Rosen (logan) wrote :

This is an old bug for a no-longer-supported Ubuntu release, and stumpwm appears to build fine with our version of sbcl in all supported Ubuntu releases. I'm going to close this accordingly, but please open a new bug if you still see issues!

Changed in sbcl (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Won't Fix
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.