Please sync sauerbraten (0.0.20090504.dfsg-1) from debian unstable

[Michael Marley]

Binary package hint: sauerbraten

A new upstream release of Sauerbraten has been made available. Could someone please package it for Karmic?

[Michael Marley (mamarley)]

So, is there any possibility of this happening? Should I file a bug in Debian?

[Dean Loros (autocrosser)]

I know that it is after the freeze for karmic---but it would be very nice.....

[Wouter Stomp (wouterstomp-deactivatedaccount)]

 sauerbraten (0.0.20090504.dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Bruno "Fuddl" Kleinert ]
   * New Upstream Version (Closes: #527032)
   * Add a script to build pristine tarballs from upstream SVN repository
   * Update my email address in some files and in the uploaders field
   * Refresh patch to fix the clean target in the top-level makefile
   * Add a patch for top-level makefile to build binaries with debug symbols
   * Updated debian/copyright as we get sources via SVN, now
   * Bump Debian standards version to 3.8.2
     + Updated section for sauerbraten-dbg
     + Use unicode copyright symbol in debian/copyright
   * Bumped debhelper compatibility level to 7
   * Versioned binary dependency on sauerbraten-data is now put into a generated
     substitution variable
   * Update Vcs-* fields in debian/control to reflect new repository location
   * Minor changes in README.Debian about download location and from where the
     sources were obtained.
 .
   [ Evgeni Golov ]
   * debian/rules:
     + Don't FTBFS with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt.
       ($(info ...) isn't allowed before the first target)
     + Neither is $(error ...), so move it into the build target.
       Closes: #511719

[Andrew Starr-Bochicchio (andrewsomething)]

Sync request ACKed

Please note that the "Nominate for Release" option is for Stable Release Updates and critical bugs that will block a release. New upstream releases are not usually appropriate for SRUs. This might be a good candidate for a backport though. Please see the following for information on backporting this to previous releases:

https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports#How to request new packages

Thanks!

[Colin Watson (cjwatson)]

[Updating] sauerbraten (0.0.20080620.dfsg-1 [Ubuntu] < 0.0.20090504.dfsg-1 [Debian])
 * Trying to add sauerbraten...
  - <sauerbraten_0.0.20090504.dfsg.orig.tar.gz: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/>
  - <sauerbraten_0.0.20090504.dfsg-1.diff.gz: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/>
  - <sauerbraten_0.0.20090504.dfsg-1.dsc: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/>
I: sauerbraten [multiverse] -> sauerbraten_0.0.20080620.dfsg-1 [multiverse].
I: sauerbraten [multiverse] -> sauerbraten-dbg_0.0.20080620.dfsg-1 [multiverse].
I: sauerbraten [multiverse] -> sauerbraten-server_0.0.20080620.dfsg-1 [multiverse].

[Michael Marley (mamarley)]

A new sauerbraten-data package is necessary too.

I also had a small question to ask. On the page for this package in Launchpad, it says that I uploaded the package. I did not upload the package. I do not even have upload privileges for the repository. How did that happen?

[Colin Watson (cjwatson)]

[Updating] sauerbraten-data (0.0.20080620-1 [Ubuntu] < 0.0.20090504-1 [Debian])
 * Trying to add sauerbraten-data...
  - <sauerbraten-data_0.0.20090504-1.diff.gz: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/>
  - <sauerbraten-data_0.0.20090504-1.dsc: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/>
  - <sauerbraten-data_0.0.20090504.orig.tar.gz: downloading from http://ftp.debian.org/debian/>

The scripts we use to process sync request bugs default to using the bug reporter as the uploader, which is how you ended up there; I just forgot to override it to Wouter in this case. It's fairly harmless though ...

[Michael Marley (mamarley)]

Thank you. I just wanted to make sure that my GPG keys had not been stolen.