On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 12:28:45PM -0000, Nicolas M wrote:
> => So my question here: why having a different startup condition for
> smbd and nmbd, as both daemons need to be running for samba to operate ?
Because:
- nmbd is only needed for operations in some environments, so smbd should
not block on nmbd being ready before starting
- nmbd *must* wait for a broadcast-capable network interface to come up
before it's started, otherwise it will fail - so it can't use the same
start condition smbd currently does.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
<email address hidden> <email address hidden>
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 12:28:45PM -0000, Nicolas M wrote:
> => So my question here: why having a different startup condition for
> smbd and nmbd, as both daemons need to be running for samba to operate ?
Because:
- nmbd is only needed for operations in some environments, so smbd should
not block on nmbd being ready before starting
- nmbd *must* wait for a broadcast-capable network interface to come up
before it's started, otherwise it will fail - so it can't use the same
start condition smbd currently does.
-- www.debian. org/
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://
<email address hidden> <email address hidden>