No "don't know/irrelevant" options when using apport for reporting samba bugs/crashes
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
samba (Ubuntu) |
Triaged
|
Low
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Original post about this at: http://
When I get smbd crashes on my system, apport tries to handle the reporting, but starts off by trying to ask questions. I can't sensibly/usefully answer these questions. For example, the first question asks:
How would you best describe your setup?
-I am running a Windows File Server
-I am connecting to a Windows File Server.
Since I am doing both, I have no idea which to choose. In any case, selecting one leads to the next question:
Did this used to work properly with a previous release?
-No
-Yes
But I never tried to use Samba in a previous release, so I can't seriously answer this.
After picking an option here, I get more questions in a similar vein. Surely there should be "I don't know/I haven't tried" options, even if they simply mean apport tells you that you can't submit a useful bug report.
Version info:
kroon@menia:~$ apt-cache policy samba
samba:
Installed: 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3
Candidate: 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3
Version table:
*** 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3 0
500 http://
100 /var/lib/
2:
500 http://
2:
500 http://
Changed in samba (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Triaged |
importance: | Undecided → High |
importance: | High → Low |