Activity log for bug #2106774

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2025-04-10 19:10:43 Renan Rodrigo bug added bug
2025-04-10 19:11:36 Renan Rodrigo bug added subscriber MIR approval team
2025-04-10 19:12:04 Renan Rodrigo description This will be needed for qq. [Availability] The package ruby-rack-session is proposed to land in Ubuntu universe - it was introduced in plucky, but did not migrate as it build-depends on ruby-rack (>= 3.0.0~), which is not available yet. The package ruby-rack-session builds for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for architectures: amd64 (all) Link to package: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-rack-session [Rationale] ruby-rack-session used to be part of ruby-rack, but was separated in version 3 and declared as a Recommands. That can be seen in the upstream README (https://github.com/rack/rack-session) and in the ruby-rack changelog (https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/r/ruby-rack/changelog-3.1.12-1) ruby-rack (3.0.0-1) experimental; urgency=medium (...) * d/control: recommend ruby-rack-session and ruby-rackup. (...) On plucky, ruby-rack stays in version 2, but we want version 3 in qq, and that would cause a component mismatch. An alternative could be turning this Recommends into a Suggests, but version 4 of ruby-sinatra (currently in -proposed, not landing on plucky, but landing on qq) have ruby-rack-session as a dependency, causing a component-mismatch in -proposed. The package ruby-rack-session is required in Ubuntu main for these scenarios, to solve the component mismatches generated by the dependency. It should first land in the qq release, together with ruby-rack v3. This MIR is similar to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby3.3/+bug/1556608 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-base64/+bug/2095497, in the sense that the code itself was already in main, as part of ruby-rack, and was separated into a specific gem now. [Security] Checked all suggested links, no CVEs/security issues in this software in the past. I'm no security expert, but there are some points I could verify: - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries, no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` (gem is a library) - Package does not install services, timers or recurring jobs - Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Package does not expose any external endpoints [Quality assurance - function/usage] The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance] - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does not have any long-term & critical open bugs: - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-rack-session/+bug - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=ruby-rack-session - Upstream https://github.com/rack/rack-session/issues - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing] The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails it makes the build fail link to build log: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/780899763/buildlog_ubuntu-plucky-amd64.ruby-rack-session_2.1.0-1_BUILDING.txt.gz autopkgtests-wise, debian/control has Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-ruby [Quality assurance - packaging] - debian/watch is present and works - debian/control defines a correct Maintainer field - This package does not yield massive lintian Warnings, Errors -`lintian --pedantic` has no output and returns 0 - Lintian overrides are not present - This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages. - The package will not be installed by default - Packaging and build is easy: https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-rack-session/tree/debian/rules [UI standards] - Application is not end-user facing (does not need translation) [Dependencies] - No further depends or recommends dependencies that are not yet in main [Standards compliance] - This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy [Maintenance/Owner] - I Suggest the owning team to be Ubuntu Server (not yet subscribed) - This does not use static builds - This does not use vendored code - This package is not rust based - The package has been built within the last 3 months in the archive - Build link on launchpad: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/780899763/buildlog_ubuntu-plucky-amd64.ruby-rack-session_2.1.0-1_BUILDING.txt.gz [Background information] - The Package description explains the package well - Upstream Name is rack-session - Link to upstream project: https://github.com/rack/rack-session This will be needed for qq.I am preemptively opening the bug to speed up process when the package lands in universe. [Availability] The package ruby-rack-session is proposed to land in Ubuntu universe - it was introduced in plucky, but did not migrate as it build-depends on ruby-rack (>= 3.0.0~), which is not available yet. The package ruby-rack-session builds for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for architectures: amd64 (all) Link to package: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-rack-session [Rationale] ruby-rack-session used to be part of ruby-rack, but was separated in version 3 and declared as a Recommands. That can be seen in the upstream README (https://github.com/rack/rack-session) and in the ruby-rack changelog (https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/r/ruby-rack/changelog-3.1.12-1) ruby-rack (3.0.0-1) experimental; urgency=medium   (...)   * d/control: recommend ruby-rack-session and ruby-rackup.   (...) On plucky, ruby-rack stays in version 2, but we want version 3 in qq, and that would cause a component mismatch. An alternative could be turning this Recommends into a Suggests, but version 4 of ruby-sinatra (currently in -proposed, not landing on plucky, but landing on qq) have ruby-rack-session as a dependency, causing a component-mismatch in -proposed. The package ruby-rack-session is required in Ubuntu main for these scenarios, to solve the component mismatches generated by the dependency. It should first land in the qq release, together with ruby-rack v3. This MIR is similar to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby3.3/+bug/1556608 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-base64/+bug/2095497, in the sense that the code itself was already in main, as part of ruby-rack, and was separated into a specific gem now. [Security] Checked all suggested links, no CVEs/security issues in this software in the past. I'm no security expert, but there are some points I could verify: - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries, no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` (gem is a library) - Package does not install services, timers or recurring jobs - Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Package does not expose any external endpoints [Quality assurance - function/usage] The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance] - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does   not have any long-term & critical open bugs:   - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-rack-session/+bug   - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=ruby-rack-session   - Upstream https://github.com/rack/rack-session/issues - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing] The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails it makes the build fail link to build log: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/780899763/buildlog_ubuntu-plucky-amd64.ruby-rack-session_2.1.0-1_BUILDING.txt.gz autopkgtests-wise, debian/control has Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-ruby [Quality assurance - packaging] - debian/watch is present and works - debian/control defines a correct Maintainer field - This package does not yield massive lintian Warnings, Errors -`lintian --pedantic` has no output and returns 0 - Lintian overrides are not present - This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages. - The package will not be installed by default - Packaging and build is easy: https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-rack-session/tree/debian/rules [UI standards] - Application is not end-user facing (does not need translation) [Dependencies] - No further depends or recommends dependencies that are not yet in main [Standards compliance] - This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy [Maintenance/Owner] - I Suggest the owning team to be Ubuntu Server (not yet subscribed) - This does not use static builds - This does not use vendored code - This package is not rust based - The package has been built within the last 3 months in the archive - Build link on launchpad: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/780899763/buildlog_ubuntu-plucky-amd64.ruby-rack-session_2.1.0-1_BUILDING.txt.gz [Background information] - The Package description explains the package well - Upstream Name is rack-session - Link to upstream project: https://github.com/rack/rack-session
2025-04-15 14:34:05 Lukas Märdian ruby-rack-session (Ubuntu): assignee Ioanna Alifieraki (joalif)