rhythmbox-metadata crashed with SIGSEGV

Bug #1275277 reported by starkus
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
rhythmbox (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Started rhythmbox for the first time, after changing the default music directory and adding the first songs I wanted to start a playback. When hitting start on an individual file nothing happend and then, after a while rhythmbox crashed.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: rhythmbox 3.0.1-1ubuntu8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-6.23-generic 3.13.0
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-6-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.13.2-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: GNOME
Date: Sat Feb 1 17:23:35 2014
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/rhythmbox/rhythmbox-metadata
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-01-25 (7 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-GNOME 14.04 "Trusty Tahr" - Alpha amd64 (20140121.1)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/rhythmbox/rhythmbox-metadata unix:tmpdir=/tmp
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=de_DE
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
 LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7f0e5130ffd7: movzbl (%r10,%rcx,1),%r10d
 PC (0x7f0e5130ffd7) ok
 source "(%r10,%rcx,1)" (0x7f0f444b1b07) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%r10d" ok
 Stack memory exhausted (SP below stack segment)
SegvReason: reading unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: rhythmbox
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gstreamer-1.0/libgstflump3dec.so
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gstreamer-1.0/libgstflump3dec.so
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gstreamer-1.0/libgstflump3dec.so
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gstreamer-1.0/libgstflump3dec.so
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gstreamer-1.0/libgstflump3dec.so
Title: rhythmbox-metadata crashed with SIGSEGV
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo

Revision history for this message
starkus (starkus) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1229400, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private → Public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.