Installing gfs-tools drags in linux-image-2.6.15-23-server, even when linux-image-2.6.15-26-server is installed

Bug #58603 reported by Michael R. Head
4
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
redhat-cluster-suite (Ubuntu)
Won't Fix
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

burner@phoenix:~$ sudo apt-get install gfs-tools
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  linux-image-2.6.15-23-server
Suggested packages:
  linux-doc-2.6.15 linux-source-2.6.15
Recommended packages:
  lilo
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  gfs-tools linux-image-2.6.15-23-server
0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 23.2MB of archives.
After unpacking 67.8MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?

OK, so it needs the server kernel, so when I select linux-server, linux-image-2.6.15-23-server still gets dragged in, even though linux-image-2.6.15-26-server superseeds it.

burner@phoenix:~$ sudo apt-get install gfs-tools linux-server
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  linux-image-2.6.15-23-server linux-image-2.6.15-26-server linux-image-server
Suggested packages:
  linux-doc-2.6.15 linux-source-2.6.15
Recommended packages:
  lilo
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  gfs-tools linux-image-2.6.15-23-server linux-image-2.6.15-26-server
  linux-image-server linux-server
0 upgraded, 5 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 46.4MB of archives.
After unpacking 135MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?

Tags: dapper
Revision history for this message
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto (fabbione) wrote :

This is VERY strange...

Package: gfs-tools
Source: redhat-cluster-suite
Version: 1.20060222-0ubuntu6
Priority: optional
Section: admin
Maintainer: Fabio M. Di Nitto <email address hidden>
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.4-1), psmisc, rhcs-modules-4

as you can see gfs-tools does not depends on the kernel, but on rhcs-modules-4 that is Provided by kernel -server images and both -23- and -26- Provides: rhcs-modules-4.

I think it's only apt-get being confused because kernel -23 and -26 are two different packages and they are not seen by apt as one being the next version of the other.

I will still look into it, but i am pretty sure you are able to rekmove -23- safely

fabio

Changed in redhat-cluster-suite:
status: Unconfirmed → Needs Info
Revision history for this message
Michael R. Head (burner) wrote :

It looks like it's apt getting confused. Here's are two cases that I get on my dapper box:

burner@backdraft:~$ sudo apt-get install gfs-tools linux-server
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  linux-image-2.6.15-23-server linux-image-2.6.15-27-server linux-image-server
Suggested packages:
  linux-doc-2.6.15 linux-source-2.6.15
Recommended packages:
  lilo
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  gfs-tools linux-image-2.6.15-23-server linux-image-2.6.15-27-server
  linux-image-server linux-server
0 upgraded, 5 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Need to get 46.4MB of archives.
After unpacking 135MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
burner@backdraft:~$ sudo apt-get install linux-server gfs-tools
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  linux-image-2.6.15-27-server linux-image-server
Suggested packages:
  linux-doc-2.6.15 linux-source-2.6.15
Recommended packages:
  lilo
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  gfs-tools linux-image-2.6.15-27-server linux-image-server linux-server
0 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Need to get 23.4MB of archives.
After unpacking 68.2MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?

And on my edgy box:
burner@phoenix:~$ sudo apt-get install gfs-tools linux-server
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  gfs2-tools linux-image-2.6.17-7-server linux-image-2.6.17-8-server
  linux-image-server
Suggested packages:
  linux-doc-2.6.17 linux-source-2.6.17
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  gfs-tools gfs2-tools linux-image-2.6.17-7-server linux-image-2.6.17-8-server
  linux-image-server linux-server
0 upgraded, 6 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 46.3MB of archives.
After unpacking 135MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? ^P
burner@phoenix:~$ sudo apt-get install linux-server gfs-tools
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  gfs2-tools linux-image-2.6.17-8-server linux-image-server
Suggested packages:
  linux-doc-2.6.17 linux-source-2.6.17
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  gfs-tools gfs2-tools linux-image-2.6.17-8-server linux-image-server
  linux-server
0 upgraded, 5 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 23.4MB of archives.
After unpacking 68.3MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?

As you can see, it depends on the order of arguments to "apt-get install".

Revision history for this message
Michael R. Head (burner) wrote :

And, BTW, indeed it is possible to remove the -23 package after it gets pulled in.

Changed in redhat-cluster-suite:
status: Needs Info → Confirmed
Mathias Gug (mathiaz)
Changed in redhat-cluster-suite (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Low
Revision history for this message
Joshua Powers (powersj) wrote :

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. In an effort to keep an up-to-date list of bugs to work I have reviewed this report to verify it still requires a fix and it occurs on a supported version of Ubuntu.

It appears that the source package redhat-cluster-suite is in precise, however the binary package gfs-tools is not.

It is unfortunate that we were unable to resolve this defect, however there appears to be no further action possible at this time. I am therefore moving the bug to 'Won't Fix'. If you disagree or have additional details, please feel free to add a comment and then change the status of the bug to 'Confirmed'.

Changed in redhat-cluster-suite (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Won't Fix
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.