Comment 7 for bug 1448911

On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 05:06:57 PM you wrote:
> On 2015-04-28 00:16:15, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Monday, April 27, 2015 10:14:47 PM you wrote:
> > > Hi Jonathan (and Scott) - This update fixes a security issue so it
> > > should go through the -security sponsoring process rather than the SRU
> > > process. The Security Team will get it sponsored to the security pocket
> >
> > > once these steps are followed:
> > I know for security it's supposed to be built against security and not
> > proposed/updates, but this close to release it's essentially the same
> > thing. Can you just pocket copy this to security?
> We can do that in this case but it definitely isn't something that we
> should make a habit of.
> Just to be clear, do you want us to copy it from -proposed to -security
> now or wait until the SRU process completes and copy it from -updates to
> -security at that time?

Your call on when. It's the upstream fix, so I'm confident it's correct, but we
can get someone to do verification first if you prefer.