Comment 16 for bug 1058200

On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 23:09 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
> On 11/04/2012 02:22 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 19:51 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
> >> Returning NULL seems to be the right thing to do here, even if
> >> gnome-control-center does not handle that very well IIRC. So we might
> >> need an additional patch in g-c-c.
> >> So assuming I commit a patch doing that. If somebody else wants to add
> >> logic to figure out how large the hole is, that could be discussed
> >> separately.
> >> Any objections?
> >
> > It's not clear what you meant by "add logic to figure out how large the
> > hole is". Add to where? pa_stream_peek() or gnome-control-center?
>
> I was referring to your earlier comment "An addition: the client
> probably wants to know how large the hole is.", i e pa_stream_peek.
>
> > To me, reporting the hole length in the "nbytes" parameter of
> > pa_stream_peek() seems like the right thing to do, so I hope your patch
> > will do this.
>
> It does not: I was just suggesting to discuss that separately.

Ok. Well, I'm suggesting to not make these issues separate, since it's a
small thing to decide and implement, and doing a separate fix would be
"fixing a fix". Does someone have an issue with returning the hole size
in the nbytes argument?

--
Tanu