pornview crashed with SIGSEGV in comment_get_from_image_info()

[George Standish]

Binary package hint: pornview

On clicking on an image on the left side preview the following error/crash occurs.

There is an initial image which seems to be highlighted on the left side, although the main window on the right is just black.

The preview has 3 PNG screenshots in it.

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: amd64
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Thu Mar 25 11:51:27 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/pornview
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha amd64 (20100215.1)
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: pornview 0.2pre1-11ubuntu1
ProcCmdline: pornview
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_CA.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-17.26-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x4171c7 <comment_get_from_image_info+247>: mov 0x30(%rbx),%rdi
 PC (0x004171c7) ok
 source "0x30(%rbx)" (0x00000030) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%rdi" ok
SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: pornview
StacktraceTop:
 comment_get_from_image_info ()
 comment_view_change_file ()
 ?? ()
 g_main_context_dispatch ()
 ?? () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
Title: pornview crashed with SIGSEGV in comment_get_from_image_info()
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-17-generic x86_64
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

[Apport retracing service (apport)]

StacktraceTop:
 comment_get_from_image_info (info=<value optimized out>) at comment.c:345
 comment_view_change_file (cv=0xefab00,
 cb_image_loader_idle (data=0xf7b680)
 g_main_context_dispatch ()
 ?? () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0

[Launchpad Janitor (janitor)]

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

[Aaron Haviland (aaron-haviland)]

This is a 64-bit pointer size bug. The attached patch should fix it.

[Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot (crichton)]

The attachment "use gsize instead of gint for pointer" of this bug report has been identified as being a patch. The ubuntu-reviewers team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review the patch. In the event that this is in fact not a patch you can resolve this situation by removing the tag 'patch' from the bug report and editing the attachment so that it is not flagged as a patch. Additionally, if you are member of the ubuntu-reviewers team please also unsubscribe the team from this bug report.

[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by Brian Murray. Please contact him regarding any issues with the action taken in this bug report.]