On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 15:53:15 -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> severity 249854 critical
The definition for "critical" is
(http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities) "makes unrelated software
on the system (or the whole system) break, or causes serious data loss, or
introduces a security hole on systems where you install the package.", none
of which is applicable, so this is completely bogus bug severity inflation.
Ray
--
Are You Pondering What I'm Pondering?
I think so Brain, but there's still a bug in there from last time.
Pinky and the Brain in "Das Mouse"
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 06:49:49 +0100
From: "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: libplanner.pc depends on libgsf-1.pc
# This package violates the dependencies part of the sarge release policy release. debian. org/sarge_ rc_policy. txt). Thus, per www.debian. org/Bugs/ Developer# severities :
# (http://
# http://
severity 249854 serious
thanks
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 15:53:15 -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> severity 249854 critical
The definition for "critical" is www.debian. org/Bugs/ Developer# severities) "makes unrelated software
(http://
on the system (or the whole system) break, or causes serious data loss, or
introduces a security hole on systems where you install the package.", none
of which is applicable, so this is completely bogus bug severity inflation.
Ray
--
Are You Pondering What I'm Pondering?
I think so Brain, but there's still a bug in there from last time.
Pinky and the Brain in "Das Mouse"