pidgin SIGSEGV

Bug #665736 reported by Marc MERLIN
14
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
pidgin (Ubuntu)
Triaged
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: pidgin

It crashes by itself when I'm not touching it (some time after launch)

Starting program: /usr/bin/pidgin
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
warning: the debug information found in "/usr/lib/debug//usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.7.7" does not match "/usr/lib/libxml2.so.2" (CRC mismatch).
warning: the debug information found in "/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.7.7" does not match "/usr/lib/libxml2.so.2" (CRC mismatch).

[New Thread 0xb5e2db70 (LWP 15170)]
(Pidgin:15167): pidgin-libnotify-plugin-DEBUG: Successfully wrote blacklist file to /home/merlin/.config/indicators/messages/applications-blacklist/pidgin-libnotify
[New Thread 0xafc3cb70 (LWP 15191)]
[New Thread 0xaf27bb70 (LWP 15192)]
[New Thread 0xae4bcb70 (LWP 15193)]
[New Thread 0xadcbbb70 (LWP 15194)]
[New Thread 0xad4bab70 (LWP 15195)]
[New Thread 0xaccb9b70 (LWP 15196)]

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xb76abd8c in ?? () from /usr/lib/libpurple.so.0
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb76abd8c in ?? () from /usr/lib/libpurple.so.0
#1 0xb7ec23cc in marshal_VOID__MINIOBJECT (closure=0x8f6b5e8,
    return_value=0x0, n_param_values=2, param_values=0x97e2d90,
    invocation_hint=0xbfffce20, marshal_data=0x0) at gstbus.c:133
#2 0xb782c412 in g_closure_invoke (closure=0x8f6b5e8, return_value=0x0,
    n_param_values=2, param_values=0x97e2d90, invocation_hint=0xbfffce20)
    at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.26.0/gobject/gclosure.c:766
#3 0xb7842595 in signal_emit_unlocked_R (node=<value optimized out>,
    detail=<value optimized out>, instance=0x86a3aa8, emission_return=0x0,
    instance_and_params=0x97e2d90)
    at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.26.0/gobject/gsignal.c:3252
#4 0xb78439bc in g_signal_emit_valist (instance=0x86a3aa8, signal_id=121,
    detail=638, var_args=0xbfffcff0 "¨:j\b")
    at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.26.0/gobject/gsignal.c:2983
#5 0xb7843e62 in g_signal_emit (instance=0x86a3aa8, signal_id=121, detail=638)
    at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.26.0/gobject/gsignal.c:3040
#6 0xb7ec0911 in gst_bus_async_signal_func (bus=0x86a3aa8, message=0x97d5420,
    data=0x0) at gstbus.c:1099
#7 0xb7ec1915 in gst_bus_source_dispatch (source=0x90c51a8,
    callback=0xb7ec0870 <gst_bus_async_signal_func>, user_data=0x0)
    at gstbus.c:760
#8 0xb7789855 in g_main_dispatch (context=0x8123898)
    at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.26.0/glib/gmain.c:2149
#9 g_main_context_dispatch (context=0x8123898)
    at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.26.0/glib/gmain.c:2702
#10 0xb778d668 in g_main_context_iterate (context=0x8123898,
    block=<value optimized out>, dispatch=1, self=0x811f008)
    at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.26.0/glib/gmain.c:2780
#11 0xb778dba7 in g_main_loop_run (loop=0x8edab28)
    at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.26.0/glib/gmain.c:2988
#12 0xb7a9f1d9 in IA__gtk_main ()
    at /build/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.22.0/gtk/gtkmain.c:1237
#13 0x080c6ee1 in main ()

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: pidgin 1:2.7.3-1ubuntu3
Uname: Linux 2.6.34.1-core2smp-1khznohz-preempt-notcks-noide-hm64-20100724 i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Oct 23 16:05:59 2010
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-1
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: pidgin

Revision history for this message
Marc MERLIN (marc-soft) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Charlie Kravetz (cjkgeek) wrote :

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please try to obtain a backtrace following the instructions at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash and upload the backtrace (as an attachment) to the bug report. This will greatly help us in tracking down your problem.

Changed in pidgin (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Charlie Kravetz (cjkgeek) wrote :

We'd like to figure out what's causing this bug for you, but we haven't heard back from you in a while. Could you please provide the requested information? Thanks!

Revision history for this message
Marc MERLIN (marc-soft) wrote :

I'll try to get this again, but I can't get it on command.
But to be clear, what is wrong with the backtrace I originally attached?

Revision history for this message
Charlie Kravetz (cjkgeek) wrote :

Is that included in the original report? If that is a complete gdb trace, it looks good. The problem with including it that way is I could not determine if it was complete, or a partial trace copied from one of the log files. It is much better to attach such things as separate plain text files.

I will go ahead and mark this confirmed based on that trace then. Thanks so much for letting us know.

Revision history for this message
Charlie Kravetz (cjkgeek) wrote :

Since this bug has enough information provided for a developer to begin work, I'm going to mark it as confirmed and let them handle it from here. NOTE: Stacktrace is included in the description. Thanks for taking the time to make Ubuntu better!

Changed in pidgin (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Medium
status: Incomplete → Triaged
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.