Activity log for bug #268580

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2008-09-10 15:04:00 Dustin Kirkland  bug added bug
2008-09-10 15:04:58 Dustin Kirkland  partman-target: status New In Progress
2008-09-10 15:04:58 Dustin Kirkland  partman-target: assignee kirkland
2008-09-10 15:04:58 Dustin Kirkland  partman-target: importance Undecided Medium
2008-09-10 15:04:58 Dustin Kirkland  partman-target: statusexplanation
2008-09-10 15:04:58 Dustin Kirkland  partman-target: milestone intrepid-alpha-6
2008-09-10 15:05:30 Dustin Kirkland  bug assigned to mdadm (Ubuntu)
2008-09-11 16:06:20 Dustin Kirkland  mdadm: status New In Progress
2008-09-11 16:06:20 Dustin Kirkland  mdadm: importance Undecided Medium
2008-09-11 16:06:20 Dustin Kirkland  mdadm: statusexplanation According to cjwatson, this should be fixed in mdadm and partman-md, not partman-target. <cjwatson> kirkland: firstly, I think this should be in partman-md, not partman-target; you can add a new check.d script for it there <cjwatson> kirkland: *bing* sorry, a lightbulb just went off <cjwatson> kirkland: you want the translated text in mdadm too, right? great. put it there, and *also* put it in mdadm-udeb, along with the check.d script! <cjwatson> no more translation syncing problem <cjwatson> that will make it much more comfortable and less namespace-violating to call the template mdadm/boot_degraded <cjwatson> kirkland: you'll need a slightly awkward trick to get the answer to the question into /target; this is necessary because (presumably) you don't want to ask the question when mdadm is actually installed, but instead during partman <cjwatson> kirkland: this trick is: db_get mdadm/boot_degraded; echo mdadm mdadm/boot_degraded boolean "$RET" | debconf-set-selections <cjwatson> with a comment explaining that you're doing this so that the value gets set in /target's debconf database before mdadm is installed <cjwatson> kirkland: in the template, you should avoid "yes"; we try to write templates so that they're agnostic of changes in the debconf frontend. We usually prefer language such as "you might want to boot your system even with a degraded RAID if ..." <cjwatson> kirkland: I think perhaps the short description could be clearer. Maybe "Do you want to boot normally even if your RAID becomes degraded?"
2008-09-11 16:06:20 Dustin Kirkland  mdadm: milestone intrepid-alpha-6
2008-09-11 16:08:55 Dustin Kirkland  bug assigned to partman-md (Ubuntu)
2008-09-11 16:09:10 Dustin Kirkland  partman-md: status New In Progress
2008-09-11 16:09:10 Dustin Kirkland  partman-md: statusexplanation
2008-09-11 16:09:20 Dustin Kirkland  partman-target: status In Progress Invalid
2008-09-11 16:09:35 Dustin Kirkland  partman-target: milestone intrepid-alpha-6
2008-09-11 16:09:51 Dustin Kirkland  mdadm: assignee kirkland
2008-09-11 16:09:51 Dustin Kirkland  mdadm: statusexplanation According to cjwatson, this should be fixed in mdadm and partman-md, not partman-target. <cjwatson> kirkland: firstly, I think this should be in partman-md, not partman-target; you can add a new check.d script for it there <cjwatson> kirkland: *bing* sorry, a lightbulb just went off <cjwatson> kirkland: you want the translated text in mdadm too, right? great. put it there, and *also* put it in mdadm-udeb, along with the check.d script! <cjwatson> no more translation syncing problem <cjwatson> that will make it much more comfortable and less namespace-violating to call the template mdadm/boot_degraded <cjwatson> kirkland: you'll need a slightly awkward trick to get the answer to the question into /target; this is necessary because (presumably) you don't want to ask the question when mdadm is actually installed, but instead during partman <cjwatson> kirkland: this trick is: db_get mdadm/boot_degraded; echo mdadm mdadm/boot_degraded boolean "$RET" | debconf-set-selections <cjwatson> with a comment explaining that you're doing this so that the value gets set in /target's debconf database before mdadm is installed <cjwatson> kirkland: in the template, you should avoid "yes"; we try to write templates so that they're agnostic of changes in the debconf frontend. We usually prefer language such as "you might want to boot your system even with a degraded RAID if ..." <cjwatson> kirkland: I think perhaps the short description could be clearer. Maybe "Do you want to boot normally even if your RAID becomes degraded?"
2008-09-11 16:10:08 Dustin Kirkland  partman-md: assignee kirkland
2008-09-11 16:10:08 Dustin Kirkland  partman-md: milestone intrepid-alpha-6
2008-09-11 16:10:18 Dustin Kirkland  partman-target: assignee kirkland
2008-09-11 16:10:30 Dustin Kirkland  partman-target: importance Medium Undecided
2008-09-11 20:09:08 Dustin Kirkland  title Prompt for BOOT_DEGRADED=true|false in thre Prompt for BOOT_DEGRADED=true|false in the installer
2008-09-12 18:34:54 Dustin Kirkland  bug added attachment 'mdadm.debdiff' (mdadm.debdiff)
2008-09-13 15:05:49 Dustin Kirkland  bug added attachment 'mdadm.debdiff' (mdadm.debdiff)
2008-09-13 15:26:31 Dustin Kirkland  bug added attachment 'mdadm.debdiff' (mdadm.debdiff)
2008-09-13 15:39:04 Colin Watson partman-md: status In Progress Invalid
2008-09-13 15:39:04 Colin Watson partman-md: assignee kirkland
2008-09-13 15:39:04 Colin Watson partman-md: statusexplanation We just need mdadm, not partman-md.
2008-09-13 15:39:04 Colin Watson partman-md: milestone intrepid-alpha-6
2008-09-13 15:40:06 Launchpad Janitor mdadm: status In Progress Fix Released
2010-10-19 09:22:23 Launchpad Janitor branch linked lp:~csurbhi/+junk/mdadm.fixes
2012-04-11 07:49:17 Launchpad Janitor branch linked lp:ubuntu/intrepid/mdadm
2012-05-21 23:18:17 Launchpad Janitor branch linked lp:~dmitrij.ledkov/ubuntu/natty/mdadm/natty-updates