Openoffice.org Gallery and fontwork gallery missing

[cowpie]

When you you click the "gallery" option, it is empty Also, if you activate the drawing toolbar, if you click "fontworks" it is also empty. They should both be filled with art.

[Mantas Kriaučiūnas (mantas)]

I can confirm this bug on my system (OOo 2.0.1-0breezy1 from http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ and Ubuntu 5.10 "Breezy").
But on another system, with older OOo 2.0.0-0ubuntu1 from http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ and Ubuntu 5.10 "Breezy" gallery and fontworks are not empty and works fine...

[Dany Martineau (dany-martineau)]

I've got this bug on my system (dapper current) with OOo-2.0.1-0ubuntu4.
There's no way to use fontwork or the gallery.
I tried to reinstalled and adjust path and nothing worked! Too bad i wanted to create a cute Valentine's card for my girlfriend, using Fontwork... :-(

[Mantas Kriaučiūnas (mantas)]

This bug is fixed in openoffice.org package version 2.0.1oob680m5-0ubuntu2~breezy1 (2.0.2RC4 backported to Ubuntu 5.10 "Breezy", packages are on ftp://ftp.akl.lt/Linux/Baltix/Baltix-Ubuntu_packages/OpenOffice.org-2.0.2RC/ )
Updated OpenOffice.org 2.0.2 packages will be included in next version after Baltix GNU/Linux 1.2

[Matthias Klose (doko)]

fixed in 2.0.1oob680m5

[Carlos Parra Camargo (carlospc)]

Nice work ;) I would like to know why the sources of 2.0.1oob680m5 version are in http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/o/openoffice.org/ but not the binaries.

I want to fix this problem for Guadalinex distro (It's breezy based) so i'm going to recompile it.

[Matthias Klose (doko)]

Carlos Parra Camargo schrieb:
> Nice work ;) I would like to know why the sources of 2.0.1oob680m5 version are in http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/o/openoffice.org/ but not the binaries.
>
> I want to fix this problem for Guadalinex distro (It's breezy based) so i'm going to recompile it.

in main, not universe.

[Carlos Parra Camargo (carlospc)]

I'm sorry, i didn't want to add this, i haven't find any way to remove it, could anybody do it?

[Matthias Klose (doko)]

Carlos Parra Camargo schrieb:
> I'm sorry, i didn't want to add this, i haven't find any way to remove
> it, could anybody do it?

I'm unsure what you mean by "remove it".

[Carlos Parra Camargo (carlospc)]

Have a look to the table at the beginning of this page, there are listed three items, i added the second one (the line that is rejected) by mistake.

Sorry again.