which is apparently now a duplicate of this bug report.
The gist of the bugs is that before he said that the dictionary was broken and that linking in en_GB.aff in place of en_ZA.aff would fix it, now Walter is saying the fix is actually breaking the dictionary. If that was true then why didn't it work correctly originally before the supposed fix?
So what is supposed to actually fix this?
I think I can do a SRU to fix this if we can come up with a solution that actually works for everyone.
The linkage was done because of bug:
http:// bugs.debian. org/cgi- bin/bugreport. cgi?bug= 536643
which was filed by Eduard Grebe who originally filed this Ubuntu bug:
https:/ /launchpad. net/bugs/ 398320
which is apparently now a duplicate of this bug report.
The gist of the bugs is that before he said that the dictionary was broken and that linking in en_GB.aff in place of en_ZA.aff would fix it, now Walter is saying the fix is actually breaking the dictionary. If that was true then why didn't it work correctly originally before the supposed fix?
So what is supposed to actually fix this?
I think I can do a SRU to fix this if we can come up with a solution that actually works for everyone.