jdownloader crashes regularily because of insufficient memory

Bug #612385 reported by thomas Lanzerstorfer
40
This bug affects 8 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
openjdk-6 (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

not sure, might be the same as bug 559444, but for me it lasts in the range of hours of running time until the crash

also not sure, if this is due to a Java VM or due to a jdownloader bug

Description: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
Release: 10.04

Ububtu 10.04 - 64 bit version, newest jdownloader (Atom D330, 2 GB Ram) using reconnect, downloading different files-shares in parallel

most of the time its "eden space" which is running out of memory, but there are also times when other memory parts reach 99 to 100% usage (see below)

I would expect, that jdownloader is running over days without any crash, as it does under Windows XP

Heap
 PSYoungGen total 5312K, used 5158K [0x00007f9a73950000, 0x00007f9a73f80000, 0x00007f9a7e3f0000)
  eden space 4544K, 99% used [0x00007f9a73950000,0x00007f9a73dbc838,0x00007f9a73dc0000)
  from space 768K, 81% used [0x00007f9a73e90000,0x00007f9a73f2d158,0x00007f9a73f50000)
  to space 832K, 67% used [0x00007f9a73dc0000,0x00007f9a73e4d158,0x00007f9a73e90000)
 PSOldGen total 42048K, used 40801K [0x00007f9a5e3f0000, 0x00007f9a60d00000, 0x00007f9a73950000)
  object space 42048K, 97% used [0x00007f9a5e3f0000,0x00007f9a60bc8408,0x00007f9a60d00000)
 PSPermGen total 48192K, used 48070K [0x00007f9a53bf0000, 0x00007f9a56b00000, 0x00007f9a5e3f0000)
  object space 48192K, 99% used [0x00007f9a53bf0000,0x00007f9a56ae1990,0x00007f9a56b00000)

or

Heap
 PSYoungGen total 23488K, used 1023K [0x00007f80ad550000, 0x00007f80aefd0000, 0x00007f80b7ff0000)
  eden space 22912K, 1% used [0x00007f80ad550000,0x00007f80ad5c1248,0x00007f80aebb0000)
  from space 576K, 99% used [0x00007f80aec40000,0x00007f80aecceba8,0x00007f80aecd0000)
  to space 2112K, 0% used [0x00007f80aedc0000,0x00007f80aedc0000,0x00007f80aefd0000)
 PSOldGen total 62784K, used 49660K [0x00007f8097ff0000, 0x00007f809bd40000, 0x00007f80ad550000)
  object space 62784K, 79% used [0x00007f8097ff0000,0x00007f809b06f0d0,0x00007f809bd40000)
 PSPermGen total 86784K, used 50044K [0x00007f808d7f0000, 0x00007f8092cb0000, 0x00007f8097ff0000)
  object space 86784K, 57% used [0x00007f808d7f0000,0x00007f80908cf328,0x00007f8092cb0000)

nothing useful in messages/syslog/warn ...

Revision history for this message
thomas Lanzerstorfer (thomas-lanzerstorfer) wrote :
Revision history for this message
thomas Lanzerstorfer (thomas-lanzerstorfer) wrote :

other hs_err_pid.......log available on request

Revision history for this message
thomas Lanzerstorfer (thomas-lanzerstorfer) wrote :
Revision history for this message
barbanegra (barbanegra555) wrote :

Not sure of the cause, but same problem here. I'm more on the minutes running time before the crash.

Revision history for this message
Johannes Müller (joh-m) wrote :

This does not happen with Sun JRE 1.6.0_21 instead of OpenJDK

Revision history for this message
thomas Lanzerstorfer (thomas-lanzerstorfer) wrote : Re: [Bug 612385] Re: jdownloader crashes regularily because of insufficient memory

On 08.08.2010 16:21, Johannes Müller wrote:
> This does not happen with Sun JRE 1.6.0_21 instead of OpenJDK
>

Just to be precise:
- last weekend it didn't happen, because I forgot to switch on
reconnect, so without reconnect it was stable for at least 1,5 days.

Therefore my question: are You working with or without reconnect on Sun
JRE 1.6.0_21?

regards
Thomas

Revision history for this message
Madelyn Del Rosario Cruz (madelyn) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Gmahomar (gmahomar) wrote :

I've been using JD without reconnect since the beginning, and I've been getting crashes from anywhere between 2 minutes and 1 day.

error log attached

Revision history for this message
Alfonso GC (alfonso-gcd) wrote :

same behaviour with me (ubuntu 10:04 64bit)

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in openjdk-6 (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
openstudent354 (franjobh) wrote :
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.