package openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b24-1.11.1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk', which is also in package default-jre-headless 1:1.6-43ubuntu2

[Craig]

problem occurred during this update secession

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b24-1.11.1-4ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
AptOrdering:
 openjdk-6-jre-headless: Install
 openjdk-6-jre-headless: Configure
 openjdk-6-jre: Configure
 icedtea-6-jre-cacao: Configure
 icedtea-6-jre-jamvm: Configure
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Jul 14 12:53:40 2012
DpkgTerminalLog:
 Preparing to replace openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b24-1.11.1-4ubuntu2 (using .../openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.3-1ubuntu0.11.10.1_i386.deb) ...
 Unpacking replacement openjdk-6-jre-headless ...
 dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.3-1ubuntu0.11.10.1_i386.deb (--unpack):
  trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk', which is also in package default-jre-headless 1:1.6-43ubuntu2
DuplicateSignature:
 Unpacking replacement openjdk-6-jre-headless ...
 dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24-1.11.3-1ubuntu0.11.10.1_i386.deb (--unpack):
  trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk', which is also in package default-jre-headless 1:1.6-43ubuntu2
ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk', which is also in package default-jre-headless 1:1.6-43ubuntu2
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20110211.1)
SourcePackage: openjdk-6
Title: package openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b24-1.11.1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk', which is also in package default-jre-headless 1:1.6-43ubuntu2
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

[Launchpad Janitor (janitor)]

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.