Please update to openjdk 21+35

[Vladimir Petko]

OpenJDK 21 build 35 is a release candidate 1[1]. We need to include it in order to provide up-to-day OpenJDK LTS preview builds in the development release of Ubuntu.

The archive currently contains 21+34 and the changelog contains only bug fixes and localisation strings updates (see changelog.txt).

[1] https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk-dev/2023-August/008059.html

[Vladimir Petko (vpa1977)]

OpenJDK 21+34 to 21+35 changes

[Vladimir Petko (vpa1977)]

Package piuparts test.
Notice: purging openjdk-21-jre/-jdk leaves files belonging to humanity-icon-theme:
------------------------
2m14.7s INFO: Warning: Package purging left files on system:
  /usr/share/icons/ owned by: humanity-icon-theme, ubuntu-mono, openjdk-21-jre:amd64, hicolor-icon-theme, adwaita-icon-theme
  /usr/share/icons/Humanity-Dark/ owned by: humanity-icon-theme
  /usr/share/icons/Humanity-Dark/icon-theme.cache not owned
  /usr/share/icons/Humanity/ owned by: humanity-icon-theme
  /usr/share/icons/Humanity/icon-theme.cache not owned
------------------------

[Vladimir Petko (vpa1977)]

As this is an Early Access release, all jtreg tests are not expected to pass.

Jtreg test result failures contain known issues:

sun/security/pkcs11/KeyStore/CertChainRemoval.java[1]
[s390] hotspot/jtreg/runtime/NMT/VirtualAllocCommitMerge.java [2]
serviceability/AsyncGetCallTrace/MyPackage/ASGCTBaseTest.java [3]
java/io/File/GetXSpace.java [java.lang.RuntimeException: java.io.IOException: Mount point not found] - infrastructure issue, test will be quarantined for the final release
java/lang/ScopedValue/StressStackOverflow.java - intermittent issue, see https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313260, will be quarantined for the final release

New Failure:
[i386] sun/security/ssl/SSLEngineImpl.java - hotspot crash[4]

The test failure is intermittent - was reproduced when running test on retry in mantic i386 chroot.
The test crashed in in ppa build with abort().
nss 3 library used in test and build matches: 2:3.92-1.

[1] https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8309214
[2] https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8309698
[3] https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8303168
[4] https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8314848

[Vladimir Petko (vpa1977)]

Basic Hello world test:
--------
root@mantic:~# apt install openjdk-21-jre-headless
....
root@mantic:~# cat << EOF > Test.java
public class Test {
    public static void main(String[] args){
        System.out.println("Hello world");
    }
}
EOF
java Test.java
Hello world

--------

[Utkarsh Gupta (utkarsh)]

Hi Vladimir,

Thanks for filing the FFe. Upon looking at the diff b/w what you propose v/s what Mantic has - https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/compare/jdk-21%2B34...jdk-21%2B35 - I concur that they're bug fixes only. I don't see any feature introduced. Hope I am not missing anything here?

Given the above, I don't think it needs a FFe in that case. What was your rationale for filing this FFe when there are no features?

Either way, I am a +1 on this upload ONCE the build failures are thoroughly looked at and debugged on all arches.

Note that I am not an official release team member yet so won't grant an FFe but as a core dev, I don't think you need one. Please let me know if I am wrong. :)

Many thanks!

[Vladimir Petko (vpa1977)]

>Given the above, I don't think it needs a FFe in that case. What was your rationale for filing this FFe when there are no features?
Technically it contains localisation changes which could be called a new feature.
' 8312572: JDK 21 RDP2 L10n resource files update'

>Either way, I am a +1 on this upload ONCE the build failures are thoroughly looked at and debugged on all arches.

As far as I understand the build was successful[1].
The jtreg (Java Regression Test Framework) failures are expected in the early access builds.

[1] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/openjdk-21/+packages

[Graham Inggs (ginggs)]

Thanks Utkarsh, I agree no FFe is needed here, unsubscribing ubuntu-release.

Vladimir, is there a reason we want to go ahead of Debian here? Why not get this uploaded there, and then sync?

[Utkarsh Gupta (utkarsh)]

+1 on the sync! :D

[Vladimir Petko (vpa1977)]

I'll try to get it done this way, keeping the issue open in case of unexpected delay and in this case we might want to go ahead of the Debian.

[Vladimir Petko (vpa1977)]

Closing the issue, +35 synced from Debian