nvidia-173 and nvidia-96 uninstallable on Precise
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVIDIA Drivers Ubuntu |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Alberto Milone | ||
Precise |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Alberto Milone | ||
nvidia-graphics-drivers-173-updates (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Precise |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Alberto Milone | ||
nvidia-graphics-drivers-96 (Ubuntu) |
Invalid
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Precise |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Alberto Milone |
Bug Description
Packages are available from the archive but uninstallable
# apt-get install nvidia-96 nvidia-173
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
nvidia-173 : Depends: xorg-video-abi-10 but it is not installable
nvidia-96 : Depends: xorg-video-abi-10 but it is not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
# apt-cache policy nvidia-96 nvidia-173
nvidia-96:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 96.43.20-0ubuntu6
Version table:
96.
500 http://
nvidia-173:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 173.14.30-0ubuntu11
Version table:
173.
500 http://
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: nvidia-173 (not installed)
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic x86_64
.tmp.unity.
ApportVersion: 1.94-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: No value set for `/apps/
CompositorRunning: compiz
Date: Tue Mar 6 14:26:34 2012
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: precise
DistroVariant: ubuntu
DkmsStatus:
virtualbox, 4.1.8, 3.2.0-17-generic, x86_64: installed
virtualbox, 4.1.8, 3.2.0-18-generic, x86_64: installed
GraphicsCard:
Intel Corporation Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0046] (rev 18) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0456]
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64 (20111012)
Lsusb:
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Bus 001 Device 002: ID 8087:0020 Intel Corp. Integrated Rate Matching Hub
Bus 002 Device 002: ID 8087:0020 Intel Corp. Integrated Rate Matching Hub
Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0c45:641d Microdia 1.3 MPixel Integrated Webcam
MachineType: Dell Inc. Inspiron N4010
ProcEnviron:
TERM=xterm
LANG=en_US.utf8
SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=
SourcePackage: nvidia-
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 01/19/2011
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: A11
dmi.board.name: 021CN3
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.board.version: A11
dmi.chassis.type: 8
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.chassis.
dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.
dmi.product.name: Inspiron N4010
dmi.product.
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.7.
version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.30-1ubuntu1
version.
version.
version.
version.
version.
version.
version.
version.
Jean-Baptiste Lallement (jibel) wrote : | #1 |
- BootDmesg.txt Edit (57.8 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
- BootLog.gz Edit (797 bytes, application/x-gzip)
- CurrentDmesg.txt Edit (48.8 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
- DpkgLog.txt Edit (482.3 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
- GconfCompiz.txt Edit (36.5 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
- Lspci.txt Edit (24.6 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
- ProcCpuinfo.txt Edit (3.3 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
- ProcInterrupts.txt Edit (2.0 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
- ProcModules.txt Edit (5.0 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
- UdevDb.txt Edit (121.5 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
- UdevLog.txt Edit (293.4 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
- UnitySupportTest.txt Edit (597 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
- XorgLog.txt Edit (31.3 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
- XorgLogOld.txt Edit (31.6 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
- Xrandr.txt Edit (3.4 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
- xdpyinfo.txt Edit (9.7 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 (Ubuntu Precise): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
assignee: | nobody → Canonical Desktop Team (canonical-desktop-team) |
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote : | #2 |
Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 (Ubuntu Precise): | |
assignee: | Canonical Desktop Team (canonical-desktop-team) → Canonical X.org (canonical-x) |
status: | New → Triaged |
Bryce Harrington (bryce) wrote : | #3 |
We do anticipate getting one more -nvidia release prior to Precise shipping, and hope that will include an updated -173. Maybe we'll get -96 too but hard to say; that appears to get attention less frequently, so we might have to drop it.
In any case, I think we should wait on dropping these until closer to final freeze, so we can see what NVIDIA puts out.
Is it possible for us to toggle off -173 and -96 from being shown in jockey until we think it'll work? Might help quell some of the bug reports we get.
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote : Re: [Bug 948053] Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise | #4 |
Bryce Harrington [2012-03-06 18:48 -0000]:
> Is it possible for us to toggle off -173 and -96 from being shown in
> jockey until we think it'll work? Might help quell some of the bug
> reports we get.
That already happens. In one of the previous cycles I changed Jockey
to compare the xorg-video-abi-* between the server and the driver, and
only show a driver if they match.
Martin
--
Martin Pitt | http://
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
suliman saadi (sulimansaadi) wrote : Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise | #5 |
i have a nvidia geforce go 7300.
i don't have 3d unity with the latest drivers. and when i attempt to install the 137 nvidia driver it fails to install.
package is broken.
Andreu Bassols (andreu-eines) wrote : | #6 |
Same problem! Trying to use a Nvidia FX5200 (uses 173 driver).
Nicolas VILA (nicolas-vila) wrote : | #7 |
Hi guys, I have a solution for you (a painless workaround)
nvidia-173 drivers are not compatible with Xorg (ABI to be precise) version released in 12.04.
So I stick with 11.10 version of Xorg. I had to make the following changes to backport Xorg:
In /etc/apt/
deb http://
deb-src http://
In /etc/apt/
Package: xserver-xorg*
Pin: release a=oneiric
Pin-Priority: 1050
Note related to nvidia-173 on Ubuntu 12.04:
I'm using old hardware with nvidia-173 drivers and I don't like the fact "composite" is mandatory to use Unity correctly (very laggy) I had to force composite to switch it "off" to avoid laggy windows by modifying /etc/X11/xorg.conf:
Section "Extensions"
Option "Composite" "Disable"
EndSection
Nicolas VILA (nicolas-vila) wrote : | #8 |
Forgot to mention that you need to run a "sudo apt-get update" and a "sudo apt-get dist-upgrade" in order to downgrade Xorg to the version from Oneiric (11.10)
Xorg is independent, so there is no conflict with any package from the rest of 12.04 release.
Enjoy.
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) wrote : | #9 |
Do NOT downgrade to the previous X stack unless you know how to get out of the mess.. suggesting anything like that on bug reports is silly and dangerous!
thanassis05 (thanassis05) wrote : | #10 |
- nvidia.log Edit (36.1 KiB, text/plain)
Same problem! Trying to use a Nvidia FX5200 (uses 173 driver).
I can not install 173 driver. I installed the current but after awhile my resolution changed to 1024X768.
cat /var/log/jockey.log and this the log
xbmc50 (xbmc50) wrote : | #11 |
Really hoping that 96 will be added to release. Sigh..
Dave Stroud (bigdavesr) wrote : | #12 |
I went out and found me a nvidia video card because I was useing a tottally unsuported video card. After searching the internet to find away to install ubuntu with the new nvidia, I now find it wont work either.I need the nvidia-96 and cant get it either for 12.04. How about a fix from ubuntu? thanks.
suli8 (suliman-saadi) wrote : | #13 |
ok. there is a workaround, to get unity 3d running.
use the open source drivers nouveau. uninstall all nvidia drivers. install nouveau firmware from synaptic.
then sudo gedit /etc/environment
and add this line: UNITY_FORCE_START=1
save, reboot and you should be able to log into unity 3d .
notice it is a workaround, the performance on the nouveau drivers might not be good.
i'm using this, while waiting for the 173 driver or hoping the new drivers will support my go 7300.
Sayantan Das (sayantan13) wrote : Re: [Bug 948053] Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise | #14 |
Does not work for me . I have tried it on nvidia-96 .
On Apr 16, 2012 1:01 PM, "suli8" <email address hidden> wrote:
> ok. there is a workaround, to get unity 3d running.
> use the open source drivers nouveau. uninstall all nvidia drivers. install
> nouveau firmware from synaptic.
> then sudo gedit /etc/environment
> and add this line: UNITY_FORCE_START=1
> save, reboot and you should be able to log into unity 3d .
>
> notice it is a workaround, the performance on the nouveau drivers might
> not be good.
> i'm using this, while waiting for the 173 driver or hoping the new drivers
> will support my go 7300.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (941325).
> https:/
>
> Title:
> nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise
>
> Status in NVIDIA Drivers Ubuntu:
> New
> Status in “nvidia-
> Triaged
> Status in “nvidia-
> Triaged
>
> Bug description:
> Packages are available from the archive but uninstallable
>
> # apt-get install nvidia-96 nvidia-173
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> nvidia-173 : Depends: xorg-video-abi-10 but it is not installable
> Recommends: nvidia-settings but it is not going to be
> installed
> nvidia-96 : Depends: xorg-video-abi-10 but it is not installable
> Recommends: nvidia-settings but it is not going to be
> installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
>
>
> # apt-cache policy nvidia-96 nvidia-173
> nvidia-96:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 96.43.20-0ubuntu6
> Version table:
> 96.43.20-0ubuntu6 0
> 500 http://
> amd64 Packages
> nvidia-173:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 173.14.30-0ubuntu11
> Version table:
> 173.14.30-0ubuntu11 0
> 500 http://
> amd64 Packages
>
> ProblemType: Bug
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
> Package: nvidia-173 (not installed)
> ProcVersionSign
> Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic x86_64
> .tmp.unity.
>
> ApportVersion: 1.94-0ubuntu2
> Architecture: amd64
> CompizPlugins: No value set for
> `/apps/
> CompositorRunning: compiz
> Date: Tue Mar 6 14:26:34 2012
> DistUpgraded: Fresh install
> DistroCodename: precise
> DistroVariant: ubuntu
> DkmsStatus:
> virtualbox, 4.1.8, 3.2.0-17-generic, x86_64: installed
> virtualbox, 4.1.8, 3.2.0-18-generic, x86_64: installed
> GraphicsCard:
> Intel Corporation Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller
> [8086:0046] (re...
Albert Pool (albertpool) wrote : Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise | #15 |
Ubuntu can't fix this, nvidia should do that.
In Natty the 96 package never got updated post-release even when nvidia released compatible driver. PLEASE do update the Precise package whenever a compatible driver turns up.
Also the Precise 173 driver is outdated. 173.14.31 has been released by nvidia. Arch Linux already has this driver and it seems to be compatible with recent software.
Albert Pool (albertpool) wrote : | #16 |
Edit. Fedora with Xorg 1.11 has working 173.14.31. So why can't we? Why do we need to stick with 173.14.30?
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) wrote : | #17 |
173.14.31 *does not* support the video ABI in xserver 1.11, so that version won't help here
Dave Stroud (bigdavesr) wrote : | #18 |
commit # 13 did not work for me. Usinf nvidia-96
suli8 (suliman-saadi) wrote : | #19 |
@dave you need to uninstall all nvidia drivers! no 96 no 173. nothing. just the nouveau drivers. hope it works for you!
Algo (algo-lkma) wrote : | #20 |
Luckily I read this post first! I won't upgrade to 12.04
djsorin (djsorinel) wrote : | #21 |
I have the same bug, hjust installed 12.04 and i can't use my FX 5500
wowo (woutvanvucht) wrote : | #22 |
I have also Geforce FX 5500. Unfortunately it has only 256 MB, so it cannot run Unity 3D.
If you have an FX 5500 you can run 12.04 LTS only in the Unity 2D mode.
FX 5500 is to old, so the only thing you can do is to buy newer video card with a minimum of 512 MB.
Also you can try a lighter version of Ubuntu, for instance Xubuntu 12.04 LTS.
Parth (parth-joshi) wrote : | #23 |
I have the same problem, I installed Ubuntu 12.04 and display hanged. Un-installed the NVIDIA driver and it works fine.
Faced a similar problem after installing Ubuntu 11.10, but could resolve it by installing NVIDIA 173 version.
But the installation for the same fails with Ubuntu 12.04. Hope the dependencies for NVIDIA 173 driver on Ubuntu 12.04 are resolved soon.
Tom Cornell (tom-cornell) wrote : | #24 |
Regarding the workaround in response #13: My GeForce Go 7300 card is now able to run Unity 3d with nvidia-current and the change to /etc/environment from the comment. So it may not be necessary to switch to the nouveau driver, at least for this card, and it may not be necessary to use the 173 driver. I'm not sure when the last time was that I could use nvidia-current -- I have been having to use 173 for several releases now. Not sure yet what performance will be like, but so far so good.
Dan Pearson (kam3bombh9-dan) wrote : | #25 |
I need to use the Nvidia 173 driver,I had it working and then upgraded to 12.04 .Waiting for a fix, don't feel like downgrading is a good idea,I can only run the 2d unity and things are slow,a fix would be nice.
joseangelmadrid (joseangelmadrid) wrote : | #26 |
I am also really hoping that 96 will be added to release. Sigh..
badrobot (badrobot) wrote : | #27 |
lspci
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation NV11 [GeForce2 MX/MX 400]
(rev a1)
same problem with nvidia-96 driver
uname -a
Linux ubuntu 3.2.0-24-generic #37-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 25 08:43:52 UTC 2012 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Release: 12.04
Codename: precise
NeverMind (agathe-durieux) wrote : | #28 |
somebody has tried to install nouveau ?
sudo apt-get install xserver-
X.Org X server -- Nouveau display driver
This driver for the X.Org X server (see xserver-xorg for a further description) provides support for NVIDIA Riva, TNT, GeForce, and Quadro cards.
This package provides 2D support including EXA acceleration, Xv and RandR. 3D functionality is provided by the libgl1-mesa-dri package.
Dave Stroud (bigdavesr) wrote : | #29 |
to commit # 28 . Both of those packages are installed by default on my system. They provide 2d support but no 3d support.Is there something else to install for 3d?
cometdog (ericctharley) wrote : | #30 |
After upgrading to 12.04 I am now stuck with low (1024x768) resolution on a 1600x1200 monitor. Would love to fix this by installing nvidia-96, but have the problem identified in this bug. For some reason I can't coax xrandr or xorg.conf to do the right thing otherwise.
03:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation NV18 [GeForce4 MX 440 AGP 8x] (rev a2)
wowo (woutvanvucht) wrote : | #31 |
1) First you can try the terminal command:
xrandr --output VGA-1 --mode 1600x1200
2) Under settings displays I could not set all the resolutions if the mirror function was marked. If you unmarked this function may be you can set your desired resolution.
Charles Peters II (cp) wrote : | #32 |
I followed Nicolas VILA suggestion in comment #7 and #8. It helped get this old mythtv frontend running with a GeForce FX 5500 AGP card. I would further suggest saving some notes on what changed so it is a bit easier to undo later.
Pedro Peixoto (pedrospeixoto) wrote : | #33 |
For #28 and #29
I am havind the nvidia driver problem and I was able to use unity 3d by removind nvidia-settings (and current of course) and using nouveau. Hope this helps...
I still wish for a nvidia driver solution.
Pedro Peixoto (pedrospeixoto) wrote : | #34 |
Forgot to say: using Gforce 540M
currynut (ceri-hopkins) wrote : | #35 |
FYI, Nicolas' suggestion #7 and #8 worked perfectly for me.
After downgrade of Xorg and reboot, no X was configured. I dLogged into tty and followed with
$ sudo apt-get install nvidia-173
After reboot all was perfectly OK with graphics. My WLAN network cards didn't initialise on first reboot, but was fine on second reboot -- probably totally unrelated.
I have Dell Insprion 8600 with the following card
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation NV34M [GeForce FX Go5200 64M] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Giorgio (gioloi72) wrote : | #36 |
I can confirm that workaround on #7 and #8 worked for me too.
I have an ASUS L5D with a GeForce FX Go 5600 VGA.
Manfred Hampl (m-hampl) wrote : RE: [Bug 948053] Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise | #37 |
There is some discussion in the Nvidia forum at http://
Quote from #15 "We're working on new ABI support for legacy branches right now; we're very sorry for the delays, we've been very busy with other stuff."
So there is still hope that updated drivers will be made available by Nvidia.
For the time being, In my opinion it would have been necessary to put a warning into the release notes of Ubuntu 12.04.
I've got a slow computer and during the upgrade I by chance even saw the text "removing nvidia-96" scrolling by, but at that moment it was already far too late to think about staying on Oneiric.
Dave Stroud (bigdavesr) wrote : RE: [Bug 948053] Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise | #38 |
> There is some discussion in the Nvidia forum at
> http://
> Quote from #15 "We're working on new ABI support for legacy branches right
> now; we're very sorry for the delays, we've been very busy with other
> stuff."
> So there is still hope that updated drivers will be made available by
> Nvidia.
>
> For the time being, In my opinion it would have been necessary to put a
> warning into the release notes of Ubuntu 12.04.
>
> I've got a slow computer and during the upgrade I by chance even saw the
> text "removing nvidia-96" scrolling by, but at that moment it was already
> far too late to think about staying on Oneiric.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/
> I noticed on the nvidia drivers page that they released some updates on
may 2. I tried the one for 96 but it would not install. Maybe there is
hope.
> _______
> Discover and compare hundreds of sources for Culinary Art School.
> http://
> _______
>
John von Holten (jwvonholten) wrote : Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise | #39 |
I have a GeForce Go N11 video card, and after upgrading to 12.04 my screen is about 2/3 of what it used to be.
I tried to increase the resolution, but it did not work.
I checked and I am using the nouveau driver. There are no other drivers available.
I guess this is all related to this bug. Does that sound correct? Thanks.
Pedro Peixoto (pedrospeixoto) wrote : | #40 |
I would like to add something for those having issues with this, as I was having. First: nouveau turned possible to use unity 3d. Now, folliwing the blog http://
tags: | added: regression-release |
Flames_in_Paradise (ellisistfroh-deactivatedaccount) wrote : | #41 |
@ pedropeixoto: You're not catching the point, sry. nvidia-
@ to whom it may concern:
Somehow or another this showstopper needs definetly beeing mentioned in
https:/
Cannot find a n y mentioning wordings there yet ???
Mainly this could help 2 r e d u c e embarassment of interested "human beeings" & poor feedback along "Precise".
Flames_in_Paradise (ellisistfroh-deactivatedaccount) wrote : | #42 |
This is exactely the same situation (wt regards to nvidia) as was in Oneiric-
https:/
In case of customer-
Wouldn't it be nice to have it added?
picomike (picomike) wrote : | #43 |
As Tom Cornell said in #24, my GeForce Go 7300 works now perfectly with current nvidia drivers (using the /etc/environmet change to bypass the blacklist), so at least this graphics card shouldn't be blacklisted anymore. I didn't even try this before because in Oneiric, current nvidia drivers caused compiz to freeze.
Thanks Tom. No need for 173 drivers now :)
Zoltán Nagy (nagyzo) wrote : | #44 |
Same issue on Xubuntu 12.04 vs. NVIDIA Corporation NV34 [GeForce FX 5500] (rev a1)
Flames_in_Paradise (ellisistfroh-deactivatedaccount) wrote : | #45 |
ftp://download.
Search in the document for the line beginning - "The 173.14.xx driver supports the following set of GPUs: ...."
Any Graphics-card below this line is affected by this issue, currently.
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) wrote : | #46 |
Yes, it's well known they are broken, and nvidia is working on it. Hopefully we'll see an update for both -96 and -173. In the meantime feel free to subscribe to this bug and/or mark it as affecting you, and wait.
Reges Cezar (reges-cezar) wrote : | #47 |
Same problem here. Trying to install nvidia-96 for an old Geforce4 card. Message about missing xorg-video-abi-10.
Hope that a fix is on the way...
Reges Cezar (reges-cezar) wrote : | #48 |
I confirm that the workaround described in #7 and #8 works for nvidia-96 as well, got my Geforce4 going with Precise.
Thanks for that.
Danny Adair (danny-adair) wrote : | #49 |
@Timo #46 "subscribe to this bug [...] and wait" is not an option after booting into a broken X (NVIDIA 8400 GS).
@Nicolas #7 / #8 Thank you, the downgrade worked fine - while I waited for my new graphics card to arrive... The NZ$80 card (NVIDIA GT 520) arrived the next day. I removed the oneiric source and pin again, reran update/dist-upgrade and then installed nvidia-current. All working now.
@Timo #9 What's "silly and dangerous" is not mentioning a showstopper in the release notes. Esp. when it is being described as "well known".
alezflute (alezflute) wrote : | #50 |
The driver is released http://
Now we can find out if Unity-3d will work with it although I think Unity-2d should also benefit from it.
Sayantan Das (sayantan13) wrote : | #51 |
nvidia-173 is released, but nvidia-96 is still missing. still doesnt help the older cards
Dave Stroud (bigdavesr) wrote : | #52 |
I read On nvidia site That the legacy 96 driver will no longer be supported but they will continue to maintain it.Not sure what that means, but hope it will work on 12.04.
Philip Wyett (philswyett) wrote : | #53 |
173.14.34 is on the nvidia site.
x86 - ftp://download.
x86_64 - ftp://download.
How long are we looking at to see an update?
Philip Wyett (philswyett) wrote : | #54 |
On the 173.14.34 driver we have an issue. I have manually installed it on a 12.04 system and 'glx' does not load.
See: http://
The 2D does and the driver installs and runs Ok, just no 3D, which tends to be a problem. :-)
Bib (bybeu) wrote : | #55 |
Same bug here for my GeForce4 Ti 4200 Go AGP 8x laptop requiring nvidia-96. I don't care with 3D, I switched to Gnome-Session-
Bib (bybeu) wrote : | #56 |
Manfred Hampl (m-hampl) wrote : | #57 |
@Bib: The 100.14.23 driver is an old version from October 2007 and is not fitting your hardware.
As you can see from ftp://download.
@all: Why isn't there a task for nvidia-
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #58 |
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-96 (Ubuntu Precise): | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-96 (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
Paul Castle (castlesoflaxey) wrote : | #60 |
I'm needing the 96 driver too (Old MX400 card). Noveau drivers just not giving me the performance I need.
I am probably going to try the #7 & 8 suggestion. It is a new build PC so if I wreck it not much lost. Can always start again (and maybe try a different graphics card if I have anything newer or an (ATI or SIS card).
Bib (bybeu) wrote : | #61 |
Found in the 173...34 README (Appendix A):
Below are the legacy GPUs that are no longer supported in the unified driver.
These GPUs ***will continue to be maintained*** through the special legacy NVIDIA
GPU driver releases.
The 96.43.xx driver supports the following set of GPUs:
NVIDIA GPU product Device PCI ID
---
GeForce2 MX/MX 400 0x0110
GeForce2 MX 100/200 0x0111
GeForce2 Go 0x0112
Quadro2 MXR/EX/Go 0x0113
GeForce4 MX 460 0x0170
GeForce4 MX 440 0x0171
GeForce4 MX 420 0x0172
GeForce4 MX 440-SE 0x0173
GeForce4 440 Go 0x0174
GeForce4 420 Go 0x0175
GeForce4 420 Go 32M 0x0176
GeForce4 460 Go 0x0177
Quadro4 550 XGL 0x0178
GeForce4 440 Go 64M 0x0179
Quadro NVS 400 0x017A
Quadro4 500 GoGL 0x017C
GeForce4 410 Go 16M 0x017D
GeForce4 MX 440 with AGP8X 0x0181
GeForce4 MX 440SE with AGP8X 0x0182
GeForce4 MX 420 with AGP8X 0x0183
GeForce4 MX 4000 0x0185
Quadro4 580 XGL 0x0188
Quadro NVS 280 SD 0x018A
Quadro4 380 XGL 0x018B
Quadro NVS 50 PCI 0x018C
GeForce2 Integrated GPU 0x01A0
GeForce4 MX Integrated GPU 0x01F0
GeForce3 0x0200
GeForce3 Ti 200 0x0201
GeForce3 Ti 500 0x0202
Quadro DCC 0x0203
GeForce4 Ti 4600 0x0250
GeForce4 Ti 4400 0x0251
GeForce4 Ti 4200 0x0253
Quadro4 900 XGL 0x0258
Quadro4 750 XGL 0x0259
Quadro4 700 XGL 0x025B
GeForce4 Ti 4800 0x0280
GeForce4 Ti 4200 with AGP8X 0x0281
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE 0x0282
GeForce4 4200 Go 0x0286
Quadro4 980 XGL 0x0288
Quadro4 780 XGL 0x0289
Quadro4 700 GoGL 0x028C
Vincent Gerris (vgerris) wrote : | #62 |
same issue here.
nouveau driver does not support 3d.
i read about an xorg downgrade but found no proper howto yet.
hope this will be fixed
Bib (bybeu) wrote : | #63 |
@Vincent: post #7 & 8 above.
I reverted to nouveau+gnome classic because nv breaks my suspend/
giardia (fabriziosm) wrote : | #64 |
same issue with a nvidia geforce2 mx400. with ubuntu 11.10 i was able to install nvidia driver from ubuntu and from xswat repo as well. on 12.04 LTS nothing. i tryed nouveau with gnome classic it works but the windows are without the frame visible...
rpkrawczyk (rpkrawczyk) wrote : | #65 |
I have the same problem with a GeForce 420 on 12.04 (precise):
> lspci
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation NV17 [GeForce4 MX 420] (rev a3)
Performance is really poor (windows lag behind) and the whole desktop is not very usable. Nouveau is installed in version:
ii libdrm-nouveau1a 2.4.32-1ubuntu1 Userspace interface to nouveau-specific kernel DRM services -- runtime
ii xserver-
Which workaround should I try?
Bib (bybeu) wrote : | #66 |
For those having issues with nouveau, I discovered on a clean oneiric->precise install (because of unavailable non-pae liveCd), that my issues with nouveau had disapeard, beautiful screen, clean cursor etc..., although poor perfs... I don't know how this happened, but after checking I learnt the driver used is vesa ! I don't know how to use vesa on my ugly system. A pity precise follows the win7 not supporting these ~old cards (mine V28).
Malcolm_C (malcolm-c) wrote : | #67 |
Having the same kind of problems with my FX5500, unable to set the screen resolution beyond 640x480. I've gone back to 11.10 while waiting for an update to the distribution.
Michael Stephenson (mickstephenson) wrote : | #68 |
Why does xorg get revved every release leading to enormous showstopper issues like this for hundreds of people?
What brilliant new feature or bug fix justifies breaking peoples installs? Can we not just stay a few releases behind unless there is a compelling reason not to?
Philip Wyett (philswyett) wrote : | #69 |
There is a new 173 version.
ftp://download.
I have installed this on kubuntu (32bit) and have glx again; and the driver seems to be working correctly.
Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 (Ubuntu Precise): | |
assignee: | Canonical X.org (canonical-x) → Alberto Milone (albertomilone) |
Maarten Fonville (maarten-fonville) wrote : | #70 |
The new version is now also available in Debian: http://
Can Alberto Milone please also put this driver in the Ubuntu repositories, so that Precise will finally become usable for those of us with older hardware? nVidia did their bit, now it is Canonical's time to do theirs.
Glenn Brumfield (brumfield-glenn) wrote : | #71 |
Looking forward to the new xorg-video-
Tory Anderson (torys-anderson) wrote : | #72 |
The new 173 off of Nvidia's site was working for me until I updated my kernel today; now it fails again. Is anyone else having this happen? Until I have a clue, I'm booting in the previous kernel.
Glenn Brumfield (brumfield-glenn) wrote : Re: [Bug 948053] Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise | #73 |
I'm running Lubuntu for the non-PAE kernel and xorg from Oneiric to be able
to use nvidia-96 driver. Video card is GeForce4 Ti 4200 Go. CPU is Pentium
M.
On Jun 14, 2012 12:51 PM, "Tory Anderson" <email address hidden> wrote:
> The new 173 off of Nvidia's site was working for me until I updated my
> kernel today; now it fails again. Is anyone else having this happen?
> Until I have a clue, I'm booting in the previous kernel.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (941325).
> https:/
>
> Title:
> nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise
>
> Status in NVIDIA Drivers Ubuntu:
> New
> Status in “nvidia-
> Triaged
> Status in “nvidia-
> Confirmed
> Status in “nvidia-
> Triaged
> Status in “nvidia-
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> Packages are available from the archive but uninstallable
>
> # apt-get install nvidia-96 nvidia-173
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> nvidia-173 : Depends: xorg-video-abi-10 but it is not installable
> Recommends: nvidia-settings but it is not going to be
> installed
> nvidia-96 : Depends: xorg-video-abi-10 but it is not installable
> Recommends: nvidia-settings but it is not going to be
> installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
>
>
> # apt-cache policy nvidia-96 nvidia-173
> nvidia-96:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 96.43.20-0ubuntu6
> Version table:
> 96.43.20-0ubuntu6 0
> 500 http://
> amd64 Packages
> nvidia-173:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 173.14.30-0ubuntu11
> Version table:
> 173.14.30-0ubuntu11 0
> 500 http://
> amd64 Packages
>
> ProblemType: Bug
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
> Package: nvidia-173 (not installed)
> ProcVersionSign
> Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic x86_64
> .tmp.unity.
>
> ApportVersion: 1.94-0ubuntu2
> Architecture: amd64
> CompizPlugins: No value set for
> `/apps/
> CompositorRunning: compiz
> Date: Tue Mar 6 14:26:34 2012
> DistUpgraded: Fresh install
> DistroCodename: precise
> DistroVariant: ubuntu
> DkmsStatus:
> virtualbox, 4.1.8, 3.2.0-17-generic, x86_64: installed
> virtualbox, 4.1.8, 3.2.0-18-generic, x86_64: installed
> GraphicsCard:
> Intel Corporation Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller
> [8086:0046] (rev 18) (prog-if 00 [VGA controlle...
Michael Stephenson (mickstephenson) wrote : Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise | #74 |
@tony Anderson you will have to rebuild the nvidia kernel module for the new kernel
rpkrawczyk (rpkrawczyk) wrote : | #75 |
Is there anything I can do to help? I need this fixed badly, so if there is a PPA to try, to compile and test something or whatever I am willing to help.
Tory Anderson (torys-anderson) wrote : | #76 |
Thankyou Michael Stephenson. That was all I need to know; rebuild the Nvidia driver and it works. I'll keep that in mind until Cannonical gets it.
Running GeForce 7150M / nForce 630M/PCI/
Daniel Cantarín (omega-canta) wrote : | #77 |
Since upgrading to 12.04 (from 10.04), my system is unstable. Graphics drivers seems to be the problem, as it's stable without nvidia drivers loaded.
Drivers version 173 worked fine for my GeForce 9800 GT during the last years (with the exception of not letting me test WebGL on Firefox).
I'm a developer, so i needed to check WebGL. For that reason i installed some new drivers version directly from nvidia a few months ago on my 10.04 installation (can't remember the version number). Eventually had to go back to 173 (from repos).
That's the reason i don't want to download drivers from nvidia site again.
So, today i tried to install the debian's version of 173.14.35: http://
Had to add "http://
This gave me some trouble with packages and versions: even had to uninstall "nvidia-current", and therefore "ubuntu-desktop". I did all this on root's recovery console.
By some magic, after restarting everything was working; even unity 3d and compiz. So i commented those repos in "sources.list", and reinstalled everything removed in the process (aptitude removed a lot of packages linked to wine, so i did "apt-get install wine" and the came back).
However, things eventually became very unstable: on some restarts there was no 3d subsystem (no unity, no d3d on wine), some other tries the compiz unity plugin reported crashes, and so on.
Right now i'm removing everything regarding that 173.14.35-1 version, and sticking to nvidia-current from x-swat ppa. I'll wait until we have an ubuntu package for ".35".
But if everything keeps this unstable, i'll have no other choice but to go away from ubuntu and try other distros. (I'd hate to, but unfortunatelly it's giving me an unacceptable instability for a workstation).
Michael Stephenson (mickstephenson) wrote : | #78 |
Personally I have solved this issue by getting a newever nvidia card however I wanted to try and help you guys out, dkms automatically builds and rebuilds kernel modules when it detects a change in kernel, which means when you install a new kernel from the repo, when you boot up it will take a couple of minutes or so longer because it is automatically compiling the new nvidia driver.
So I had a poke about with making dkms work for the new 173 driver and here is what I did maybe someone can get this working and post it as a guide for others to use:
cd ~/Downloads
wget ftp://download.
chmod +x NVIDIA-
./NVIDIA-
cd ./NVIDIA-
gedit ./dkms.conf
Paste in this crap:
PACKAGE_
PACKAGE_
CLEAN="make clean"
BUILT_MODULE_
DEST_MODULE_
MAKE[0]="make module KERNDIR=
DEST_MODULE_
AUTOINSTALL="yes"
Save and exit
sudo dkms add ./NVIDIA-
Check to see /usr/src/
sudo dkms build nvidia-
This is where it fails if this had work the next step would probably be:
sudo dkms install nvidia-
Since I don't have an older card any more I don't have the necessary drive to follow through on this but I'm sure some of you guys still hit by the bug do, so go make it work and post the solution!
Malcolm_C (malcolm-c) wrote : Re: [Bug 948053] Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise | #79 |
Michael, just curious to know from which Nvidia to which newer card you
upgraded. I have a fx5500 on AGP and as far as I can see the choice to
upgrade is very limited.
Thanks.
Malcolm
On 16 June 2012 11:58, Michael Stephenson <email address hidden> wrote:
> Personally I have solved this issue by getting a newever nvidia card
> however I wanted to try and help you guys out, dkms automatically builds
> and rebuilds kernel modules when it detects a change in kernel, which means
> when you install a new kernel from the repo, when you boot up it will take
> a couple of minutes or so longer because it is automatically compiling the
> new nvidia driver.
> So I had a poke about with making dkms work for the new 173 driver and
> here is what I did maybe someone can get this working and post it as a
> guide for others to use:
>
>
> cd ~/Downloads
>
> wget ftp://download.
> Linux-x86-
>
> chmod +x NVIDIA-
>
> ./NVIDIA-
>
> cd ./NVIDIA-
>
> gedit ./dkms.conf
>
> Paste in this crap:
>
> PACKAGE_
> PACKAGE_
> CLEAN="make clean"
> BUILT_MODULE_
> DEST_MODULE_
> MAKE[0]="make module KERNDIR=
> IGNORE_
> DEST_MODULE_
> AUTOINSTALL="yes"
>
>
> Save and exit
>
> sudo dkms add ./NVIDIA-
>
> Check to see /usr/src/
>
> sudo dkms build nvidia-
>
> This is where it fails if this had work the next step would probably be:
>
> sudo dkms install nvidia-
>
> Since I don't have an older card any more I don't have the necessary
> drive to follow through on this but I'm sure some of you guys still hit
> by the bug do, so go make it work and post the solution!
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise
>
> Status in NVIDIA Drivers Ubuntu:
> New
> Status in “nvidia-
> Triaged
> Status in “nvidia-
> Confirmed
> Status in “nvidia-
> Triaged
> Status in “nvidia-
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> Packages are available from the archive but uninstallable
>
> # apt-get install nvidia-96 nvidia-173
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The...
Michael Stephenson (mickstephenson) wrote : Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise | #80 |
I think my last one was nvidia 8600gs pci-e and I upgraded to this card: http://
It seems that no agp cards really exist for the new chipsets unfortunately :( Maybe it's time to get a motherboard with pci-e and perhaps onboard graphics with a newer nvidia chipset?
Malcolm_C (malcolm-c) wrote : Re: [Bug 948053] Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise | #81 |
Thanks for the speedy reply, yes perhaps it's time to upgrade the
motherboard, it's a shame though since 11.10 runs fine on this PC.
On 16 June 2012 13:27, Michael Stephenson <email address hidden> wrote:
> I think my last one was nvidia 8600gs pci-e and I upgraded to this card:
>
> http://
>
> It seems that no agp cards really exist for the new chipsets
> unfortunately :( Maybe it's time to get a motherboard with pci-e and
> perhaps onboard graphics with a newer nvidia chipset?
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise
>
> Status in NVIDIA Drivers Ubuntu:
> New
> Status in “nvidia-
> Triaged
> Status in “nvidia-
> Confirmed
> Status in “nvidia-
> Triaged
> Status in “nvidia-
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> Packages are available from the archive but uninstallable
>
> # apt-get install nvidia-96 nvidia-173
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> nvidia-173 : Depends: xorg-video-abi-10 but it is not installable
> Recommends: nvidia-settings but it is not going to be
> installed
> nvidia-96 : Depends: xorg-video-abi-10 but it is not installable
> Recommends: nvidia-settings but it is not going to be
> installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
>
>
> # apt-cache policy nvidia-96 nvidia-173
> nvidia-96:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 96.43.20-0ubuntu6
> Version table:
> 96.43.20-0ubuntu6 0
> 500 http://
> amd64 Packages
> nvidia-173:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 173.14.30-0ubuntu11
> Version table:
> 173.14.30-0ubuntu11 0
> 500 http://
> amd64 Packages
>
> ProblemType: Bug
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
> Package: nvidia-173 (not installed)
> ProcVersionSign
> Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic x86_64
> .tmp.unity.
>
> ApportVersion: 1.94-0ubuntu2
> Architecture: amd64
> CompizPlugins: No value set for
> `/apps/
> CompositorRunning: compiz
> Date: Tue Mar 6 14:26:34 2012
> DistUpgraded: Fresh install
> DistroCodename: precise
> DistroVariant: ubuntu
> DkmsStatus:
> virtualbox, 4.1.8, 3.2.0-17-generic, x86_64: installed
> virtualbox, 4.1.8, 3.2.0-18-generic, x86_64: installed
> Graphic...
Daniel Cantarín (omega-canta) wrote : Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise | #82 |
Michael:
thank you very much for the explanation. Since yesterday, after installing the last nvidia-current version from x-swat ppa, i didn't suffered any reboot or hang yet. But if the symptoms come back, i'll try the method you posted here (and, of course, post the results).
[offtopic]
On the other hand, i'd like to say something about your suggestion on upgrading: NO.
That's exactly the kind of things Wintel did to every one of us during the last two decades, and is not the answer.
There was no problem with 173 drivers, there's no problem with the hardware, the problem lies in the distribution changes.
I don't pretend to be naggy here: i love Ubuntu, love gnu/linux, and it dramatically changed my life for good (as a developer) when it gave me the chance to go away from Microsoft. So i'm grateful, and now i tell everyone to get into FLOOS and the community-made software world. That's the reason i can't stand before your recomendation of changing the video card, and of course then the motherboard, which also implies almost everytime a new processor, sometimes new ram, not to mention the rest of the "legacy" peripherals, because of a package dependency problem.
The hardware is fine, the distro runs fine on it, it's just a package change what's bringing all the buzz here. I have a GeForce 9800 GT, 512 MB DDR3, PCIE, and can't install the driver that always worked for me because of that "xorg-video-abi-10" package.
(To be fair, NVidia always had A LOT of trouble, and responsability, regarding graphic cards drivers: anyone tried TNT2 on Win2k?)
What i would like is to get the ability to change my current video driver using "jockey-gtk". That is: selecting 173 for stability, and selecting 295 for new technologies testing purposes. Much more than changing the hardware, i would check for some hack to tell 173 that "abi-10" is installed even when it's not, and tell it then to use whatever other package is out there replacing "abi-10".
Of course, that would be a lot of work. But the consequences are: a lot of people does not need to buy a new PC.
[/offtopic]
Anyway, i'm sure that sooner or later we'll have a 173.14.35 package on ubuntu repos, and #948053 will at last be closed. I'll be patient a few months.
Michael Stephenson (mickstephenson) wrote : | #83 |
I only mentioned that I upgraded to avoid any further hassle using legacy drivers, I agree with you entirely, but I guess I chose the path of least resistance and fell in line.
However as I ranted further up the real answer to this is to stop revving to the newest bleeding edge x server all the bloody time!
Patola (patola) wrote : | #84 |
I have a GeForce 440 MX, it uses driver -96 and worked perfectly with the Xorg that comes with 12.04. 2:1.11.
Glenn Brumfield (brumfield-glenn) wrote : Re: [Bug 948053] Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise | #85 |
Thanks, I'm away from my computer right now but I'll look into it.
On Jun 16, 2012 2:00 PM, "Patola" <email address hidden> wrote:
> I have a GeForce 440 MX, it uses driver -96 and worked perfectly with
> the Xorg that comes with 12.04. 2:1.11.
> installed the latest -96 driver from NVIDIA site: NVIDIA-
> Linux-x86-
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (941325).
> https:/
>
> Title:
> nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise
>
> Status in NVIDIA Drivers Ubuntu:
> New
> Status in “nvidia-
> Triaged
> Status in “nvidia-
> Confirmed
> Status in “nvidia-
> Triaged
> Status in “nvidia-
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> Packages are available from the archive but uninstallable
>
> # apt-get install nvidia-96 nvidia-173
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> nvidia-173 : Depends: xorg-video-abi-10 but it is not installable
> Recommends: nvidia-settings but it is not going to be
> installed
> nvidia-96 : Depends: xorg-video-abi-10 but it is not installable
> Recommends: nvidia-settings but it is not going to be
> installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
>
>
> # apt-cache policy nvidia-96 nvidia-173
> nvidia-96:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 96.43.20-0ubuntu6
> Version table:
> 96.43.20-0ubuntu6 0
> 500 http://
> amd64 Packages
> nvidia-173:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 173.14.30-0ubuntu11
> Version table:
> 173.14.30-0ubuntu11 0
> 500 http://
> amd64 Packages
>
> ProblemType: Bug
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
> Package: nvidia-173 (not installed)
> ProcVersionSign
> Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic x86_64
> .tmp.unity.
>
> ApportVersion: 1.94-0ubuntu2
> Architecture: amd64
> CompizPlugins: No value set for
> `/apps/
> CompositorRunning: compiz
> Date: Tue Mar 6 14:26:34 2012
> DistUpgraded: Fresh install
> DistroCodename: precise
> DistroVariant: ubuntu
> DkmsStatus:
> virtualbox, 4.1.8, 3.2.0-17-generic, x86_64: installed
> virtualbox, 4.1.8, 3.2.0-18-generic, x86_64: installed
> GraphicsCard:
> Intel Corporation Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller
> [8086:0046] (rev 18) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
> Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0456]
> InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11....
Glenn Brumfield (brumfield-glenn) wrote : | #86 |
Hi Patola, I'm running a notebook that uses a Pentium-M processor
(necessitates the non-PAE kernel) and an nVidia Geforce4 Ti 4200 Go (AGP
8X) video card. I've been using Ubuntu 32-bit on this notebook since Dapper
Drake, and the last Live-CD that would run properly on this computer was
8.04.4. Hardy Heron used the nv driver to support this video card, but
Ubuntu has replaced nv with nouveau which does not support this video card.
I am currently running xserver-xorg-core 2:1.10.4-1ubuntu4 (from Oneiric)
to be able to use nvidia-
available -96 driver from nVidia. This is because nvidia-96 is not yet ABI
compatible with x.org ABI 11 or newer. I hope that clarifies my situation
as it applies to nvidia-96. I also look forward to nVidia bringing out
NVIDIA-
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Patola <email address hidden> wrote:
> I have a GeForce 440 MX, it uses driver -96 and worked perfectly with
> the Xorg that comes with 12.04. 2:1.11.
> installed the latest -96 driver from NVIDIA site: NVIDIA-
> Linux-x86-
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (941325).
> https:/
>
> Title:
> nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise
>
> Status in NVIDIA Drivers Ubuntu:
> New
> Status in “nvidia-
> Triaged
> Status in “nvidia-
> Confirmed
> Status in “nvidia-
> Triaged
> Status in “nvidia-
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> Packages are available from the archive but uninstallable
>
> # apt-get install nvidia-96 nvidia-173
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> nvidia-173 : Depends: xorg-video-abi-10 but it is not installable
> Recommends: nvidia-settings but it is not going to be
> installed
> nvidia-96 : Depends: xorg-video-abi-10 but it is not installable
> Recommends: nvidia-settings but it is not going to be
> installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
>
>
> # apt-cache policy nvidia-96 nvidia-173
> nvidia-96:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 96.43.20-0ubuntu6
> Version table:
> 96.43.20-0ubuntu6 0
> 500 http://
> amd64 Packages
> nvidia-173:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 173.14.30-0ubuntu11
> Version table:
> 173.14.30-0ubuntu11 0
> 500 http://
> amd64 Packages
>
> ProblemType: Bug
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
> Package: nv...
w3bmast3r101 (w3bmast3r101) wrote : Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise | #87 |
I have been following this thread for about a month and thought I'd offer what I did to get 3d acceleration working. (NOT USING NVIDIA-173) I myself have a: NVIDIA Corporation NV34 [GeForce FX 5500] (rev a1) and the drivers that were included with the default install were the: Nouveau drivers and they were dog slow.
However, Ubuntu also has the DRI experimental package: libgl1-
sudo apt-get install xserver-
Then reboot and see how well it works for you.
NoOp (glgxg) wrote : | #88 |
While I know that glxgears is not a reliable benchmark, the following demonstrates the issue between nvidia-96 and nouveau. I have two machines with the same hardware, and both use an nVidia Quatro4 900 XGL. Both are running as non-Unity (gnome-classic) & both are set to use compiz identical (I can easily rotate the desktops w/Ctrl-Alt-mouse & flib between w/Ctrl-
Glxgears on the on running 11.04
glxgears -info
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
GL_RENDERER = Quadro4 900 XGL/AGP/SSE2
GL_VERSION = 1.5.8 NVIDIA 96.43.20
GL_VENDOR = NVIDIA Corporation
GL_EXTENSIONS = <snipped for brevity - but happy to post if helpful>
6578 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1315.524 FPS
7383 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1475.597 FPS
7594 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1518.743 FPS
7321 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1464.091 FPS
7351 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1470.171 FPS
$ sudo lshw -C display
*-display
description: VGA compatible controller
product: NV25GL [Quadro4 900 XGL]
vendor: nVidia Corporation
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@0000:01:00.0
version: a3
width: 32 bits
clock: 66MHz
resources: irq:16 memory:
Glxgears on the on running 12.04:
$ glxgears -info
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
GL_RENDERER = Mesa DRI nv25 x86/MMX/SSE2
GL_VERSION = 1.2 Mesa 8.0.2
GL_VENDOR = Nouveau
GL_EXTENSIONS = <snipped for brevity>
4005 frames in 5.0 seconds = 800.934 FPS
4248 frames in 5.0 seconds = 849.541 FPS
4240 frames in 5.0 seconds = 847.968 FPS
3910 frames in 5.0 seconds = 781.843 FPS
4242 frames in 5.0 seconds = 848.253 FPS
$ sudo lshw -C display
*-display
description: VGA compatible controller
product: NV25GL [Quadro4 900 XGL]
vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@0000:01:00.0
version: a3
width: 32 bits
clock: 66MHz
resources: irq:16 memory:
Quite a difference in performance between the two.
That said: I fully realise that Ubuntu can't release an updated nvidia-96 until nVidia does. And from following this nvidia forum thread, it doesn't look like it will be anytime soon:
<http://
<http://
So for those of us that require nvidia-96, my suggestion is to follow the nvida forum thread instead of creating a forum her...
Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | Canonical X.org (canonical-x) → Alberto Milone (albertomilone) |
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #89 |
This bug was fixed in the package nvidia-
---------------
nvidia-
* New upstream release:
- Added support for xserver 1.11.99.901 (also known
as 1.12 RC1).
- Added support for X.Org xserver 1.11 (LP: #948053).
- Improved compatibility with recent Linux kernels.
- Fixed a bug that caused libglx.so to fail to load
on 32-bit X servers.
-- Alberto Milone <email address hidden> Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:26:23 +0200
Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Triaged → Fix Released |
Steffen Goetz (steffengoetz) wrote : | #90 |
Hi Alberto!
When will the fixed package be available for Precise 12.04?
thanassis05 (thanassis05) wrote : | #91 |
Hello everyone,
I noticed that when I installed Xubuntu as extra with Ubuntu there is the latest driver nvidia173.14.35 and works fine! Is it true?
Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 (Ubuntu Precise): | |
status: | Triaged → New |
status: | New → Confirmed |
Malcolm_C (malcolm-c) wrote : Re: [Bug 948053] Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise | #92 |
I just checked the packages list for precise
http://
173, i.e version...30, not ...35.
nvidia-173 (173.14.
driver, kernel module and VDPAU library
nvidia-173-dev (173.14.
driver development files
nvidia-173-updates (173.14.
Xorg driver, kernel module and VDPAU library
nvidia-
Xorg driver development files
Am I looking in the wrong place or is there something else I'm missing?
Thanks for any pointers.
Malcolm
On 1 July 2012 16:58, thanassis05 <email address hidden> wrote:
> ** Changed in: nvidia-
> Status: Triaged => New
>
> ** Changed in: nvidia-
> Status: New => Confirmed
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise
>
> Status in NVIDIA Drivers Ubuntu:
> New
> Status in “nvidia-
> Fix Released
> Status in “nvidia-
> Confirmed
> Status in “nvidia-
> Confirmed
> Status in “nvidia-
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> Packages are available from the archive but uninstallable
>
> # apt-get install nvidia-96 nvidia-173
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> nvidia-173 : Depends: xorg-video-abi-10 but it is not installable
> Recommends: nvidia-settings but it is not going to be
> installed
> nvidia-96 : Depends: xorg-video-abi-10 but it is not installable
> Recommends: nvidia-settings but it is not going to be
> installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
>
>
> # apt-cache policy nvidia-96 nvidia-173
> nvidia-96:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 96.43.20-0ubuntu6
> Version table:
> 96.43.20-0ubuntu6 0
> 500 http://
> amd64 Packages
> nvidia-173:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 173.14.30-0ubuntu11
> Version table:
> 173.14.30-0ubuntu11 0
> 500 http://
> amd64 Packages
>
> ProblemType: Bug
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
> Package: nvidia-173 (not installed)
> ProcVersionSign
> Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic x86_64
> .tmp.unity.
>
> ApportVersion: 1.94-...
Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-173-updates (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Fix Released |
Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-173-updates (Ubuntu Precise): | |
status: | New → Triaged |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 (Ubuntu Precise): | |
status: | Confirmed → Triaged |
Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-173-updates (Ubuntu Precise): | |
assignee: | nobody → Alberto Milone (albertomilone) |
Alberto Milone (albertomilone) wrote : Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise | #93 |
SRU request:
nvidia-
linuxbastard (linuxbastard) wrote : | #94 |
Hi Alberto,
I've noticed the updated driver, how do I go about installing this? I have installed the x-swat repo and currently have the nvidia-current driver activated but not being used.
I tried downloading the nvidia-
Any help or instructions would be appreciated.
Thanks.
Alen Masic (alenn-masic) wrote : | #95 |
I'm using Nvidia GeForce FX 5500. Can you tell me is this problem fixed, can I safely install 173.xxx.xxx drivers and do they work?
Louis Simons (lousimons) wrote : | #96 |
With the updates in precise-proposed, does this mean that the suggested means of installing the nvidia-173 (or nvidia-96) packages will be via "Additional Drivers" in the near future? It sounds like manual driver installation from NVidia is already compatible with the precise xserver-xorg-core package, but I'm happy to wait a bit if there is a smoother option to be deployed soon.
Is there a way we could test out the packages in precise-proposed (is that from the milestone-propsed PPA?) and provide feedback (if that would be helpful)?
Bryce Harrington (bryce) wrote : | #97 |
If you have questions on how to install or use proprietary driver updates, please ask on askubuntu.com rather than in this bug report. This report is *only* for tracking the update of the driver, not for providing individual technical support.
Chris Halse Rogers (raof) wrote : Please test proposed package | #98 |
Hello Jean-Baptiste, or anyone else affected,
Accepted nvidia-
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not, change the tag to verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-173-updates (Ubuntu Precise): | |
status: | Triaged → Fix Committed |
tags: | added: verification-needed |
Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 (Ubuntu Precise): | |
status: | Triaged → Fix Committed |
Chris Halse Rogers (raof) wrote : | #99 |
Hello Jean-Baptiste, or anyone else affected,
Accepted nvidia-
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not, change the tag to verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
linuxbastard (linuxbastard) wrote : Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise | #100 |
Hi,
I installed the updates via the steps indicated in the "EnabledProposed" document.
After restart, the system is stuck in low graphics mode with a warning that my display could not be determined.
Uninstalled the update and is back on desktop with 1024x768 resolution and default driver.
Clint Byrum (clint-fewbar) wrote : | #101 |
Sounds like a failed verification to me unfortunately. linuxbastard, can you perhaps share your hardware details? The best way to do that would be to do 'ubuntu-bug nvidia-
tags: |
added: verification-failed removed: verification-needed |
Fran (franciscodavid) wrote : | #102 |
linuxbastard, check your kernel version. I had the same problem and I noticed I was running 3.5.0-4-generic from xorg-edgers PPA. After returning to the official repository's version (3.2.0) the nvidia-173-updates package is working correctly on my machine.
linuxbastard (linuxbastard) wrote : | #103 |
Hi again,
@ Fran,
Unfortunately, I'm already on the official kernel.
linuxbastard@XXX:~$ uname -r
3.2.0-26-
@Clint Byrum
Did you mean for me to do 'ubuntu-bug nvidia-173'? Doing 'ubuntu-bug nvidia-
Luke Sticka (the87thbombfish) wrote : | #104 |
Hello, new Ubuntu user over here. I followed the directions as linked by Chris, and apt-get continues to tell me the following:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
nvidia-173 : Depends: xorg-video-abi-10 but it is not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
I noticed that the instructions were for Aptitude - is this the correct procedure for apt-get? I do not see any new drivers under System Settings > Additional Drivers either.
Luke Sticka (the87thbombfish) wrote : | #105 |
...and to prove how new I am, a simple sudo apt-get update solved that problem, didn't it. Disregard.
Dave Stroud (bigdavesr) wrote : | #106 |
I pined down nvidia on the 96 driver. They have no desire to do anything to update or maintain this driver, nor or they interested in allowing any one else to fix it. Is it possible that the open source driver could be made to work.I have tried the latest mageia release with same kerrneol as 12.04 . It shows my card as a nv11 which is what 12.04 shows as an open sorce. driver. It works great. Just a question. thanks
Norbert Illes (nilles) wrote : | #107 |
Hi,
I have installed the precise-proposed update and it's seems to be working fine.
dpkg -l | grep nvidia
ii nvidia-173 173.14.
ii nvidia-common 1:0.2.44 Find obsolete NVIDIA drivers
ii nvidia-settings 295.33-0ubuntu1 Tool of configuring the NVIDIA graphics driver
lsmod | grep nvidia
nvidia 7098356 24
uname -r
3.2.0-26-
lspci | grep VGA
02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation NV34 [GeForce FX 5200] (rev a1)
linuxbastard (linuxbastard) wrote : | #108 |
Hi,
Just for "fun" I did a clean install of 12.04. Did updates then went through the precise proposed steps again.
I didn't get the crash, but again am stuck in 640x480. Uninstalling both nvidia-173 and nvidia-173-updates brings me back to 1024x768.
lspci | grep VGA
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation NV34 [GeForce FX 5500] (rev a1)
uname -r
3.2.0-26-
lsmod | grep nvidia
nvidia 7098356 24
dpkg -l | grep nvidiaii nvidia-173 173.14.
rc nvidia-173-updates 173.14.
ii nvidia-common 1:0.2.44 Find obsolete NVIDIA drivers
ii nvidia-settings 295.33-0ubuntu1 Tool of configuring the NVIDIA graphics driver
ii nvidia-
Maybe it's just me. ;)
Michele Giacomoli (michele-giacomoli) wrote : Re: [Bug 948053] Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise | #109 |
I also have installed the precise-proposed drivers in both ubuntu and
xubuntu 12.04 on the same machine (NVIDIA GeForce FX 5500) and it works
well on both installations, but in ubuntu it keeps using unity-2d instead
of unity. Is this the correct behavoir?
Edward Schwartz (moo-launchpad-z-edmcman) wrote : | #111 |
The precise-proposed version of nvidia-173 work for me too. I am going to set the tag to verification-done, since I think the above poster that had trouble is probably having general X configuration problems, rather than problems with this bug.
tags: |
added: verification-done removed: verification-failed |
Steffen Goetz (steffengoetz) wrote : | #112 |
I can confirm #109. I'm using a GeForce FX 5200 card. I've tried to force unity to start by adding UNITY_FORCE_START=1 to /etc/environment. Unity starts but is unusable (icons missing and very very slow), so I assume that Unity simply does not work with an old card like this. I will stay with Unity 2D for now.
However, package nvidia-173 from ubuntu-proposed is installable and working, so I think this bug is solved :-)
Luke Sticka (the87thbombfish) wrote : | #113 |
I have not experienced any particular problems with Ubuntu or Ubuntu 2D using this driver.
However, I have experienced two issues which cause a minor concern for me.
If I scroll quickly enough, I have a diagonal 'line' which runs on my monitor from its "northwest" to its "southeast" corner. It's not really a line per se, rather the illusion of a line, as it appears that one half of the screen is refreshing "before" the other half. I am assuming for now that this is more to do with my refresh rate, but I must say that I did not experience this on the same computer two months ago when I was running Windows XP.
Additionally, on shutdown I no longer see an account of the computer's "final processes" in the terminal, or whatever was previously displayed. Instead, I get a distorted image of my desktop background (which is currently set to rotate through the default desktops).
Aside from this however, it does appear that the card is functioning correctly, and applications which used to drag due to graphic content (i.e, Software Center) are now quite visibly faster and more responsive.
I'm currently at work and away from the computer I'm using Ubuntu on, and I'd like to provide more comprehensive details if they are warranted. Please advise. :)
Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote : Update Released | #114 |
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regresssions.
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise | #115 |
This bug was fixed in the package nvidia-
---------------
nvidia-
* New upstream release:
- Added support for xserver 1.11.99.901 (also known
as 1.12 RC1).
- Added support for X.Org xserver 1.11 (LP: #948053).
- Improved compatibility with recent Linux kernels.
- Fixed a bug that caused libglx.so to fail to load
on 32-bit X servers.
* debian/control.in:
- Bump build dependency on debhelper.
* debian/
- Don't apply any patches.
* debian/rules:
- Re-enable automatic ABI detection.
-- Alberto Milone <email address hidden> Wed, 04 Jul 2012 13:29:51 +0200
Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 (Ubuntu Precise): | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote : Update Released | #116 |
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regresssions.
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : Re: nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise | #117 |
This bug was fixed in the package nvidia-
---------------
nvidia-
* New upstream release:
- Added support for xserver 1.11.99.901 (also known
as 1.12 RC1).
- Added support for X.Org xserver 1.11 (LP: #948053).
- Improved compatibility with recent Linux kernels.
- Fixed a bug that caused libglx.so to fail to load
on 32-bit X servers.
* debian/control.in:
- Bump build dependency on debhelper.
* debian/
- Don't apply any patches.
-- Alberto Milone <email address hidden> Wed, 04 Jul 2012 15:40:55 +0200
Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-173-updates (Ubuntu Precise): | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
summary: |
- nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise + nvidia-96 uninstallable on Precise |
summary: |
- nvidia-96 uninstallable on Precise + nvidia-173 and nvidia-96 uninstallable on Precise |
Ronald (ronald-bynoe) wrote : | #118 |
Is there a plan for resolving the issue with nvidia-96 or is nVidia unlikely to provide the same update for those cards? I have a GeForce MX 4000 that worked fine in 11.10 but now doesn't, and the 173 drivers don't work with it. I know it's an old card, but sourcing AGP cards is getting hard! I'd rather keep this computer working as long as I can, even if that means dropping down to 11.10. Could there be an official backport path of some sort for getting a still-compatible version of Xorg installed on 12.04 if the driver is unlikely to be updated?
Ditching a motherboard & GPU for a new release of X doesn't seem like a stellar solution to the problem.
El Pensador (el-pensador) wrote : | #119 |
Hi,
Good news, Nvidia has released a new 96.xx version (96.43.23)
Changes since 96.43.20:
- Added support for X.Org xserver versions 1.11 and 1.12
- Improved compatibility with recent Linux kernels
ftp://download.
ftp://download.
NoOp (glgxg) wrote : | #120 |
The good news is that it does install & work (after removing nouveau) & glxgears is now comparable to my 11.10 install (see my comment #88 for comarison) & pretty much rips:
$ glxgears -info
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
GL_RENDERER = Quadro4 900 XGL/AGP/SSE2
GL_VERSION = 1.5.8 NVIDIA 96.43.23
GL_VENDOR = NVIDIA Corporation
GL_EXTENSIONS = GL_ARB_
8368 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1673.413 FPS
11717 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2343.388 FPS
10713 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2142.474 FPS
11459 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2291.688 FPS
11388 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2277.531 FPS
10105 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2020.909 FPS
The not so good news is that you still can't get 3D with Unity:
$ /usr/lib/
OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation
OpenGL renderer string: Quadro4 900 XGL/AGP/SSE2
OpenGL version string: 1.5.8 NVIDIA 96.43.23
Not software rendered: yes
Not blacklisted: yes
GLX fbconfig: yes
GLX texture from pixmap: yes
GL npot or rec...
giardia (fabriziosm) wrote : | #121 |
installed the new nvidia driver release.
(actually, i have still nouveou package installed, but nvidia installer provided to disable the nouveau drivers with a modprobe config file)
it works...but with my nvidia geforce2 mx400 and a monitor acer X193HQL, by default it choose the resolution of 1280x800 but is not a pleasure for the eyes...the best resolution for the acer should be 1366x768, but, when i choose the 1360x768 resolution in nvidia xserver settings, the desktop is not full in the monitor, the right part is missing. so i have to choose a way in the middle (1280x800). is it a problem with the driver or with the Xconfig?
giardia (fabriziosm) wrote : | #122 |
edit: by default is 1280x960
Bib (bybeu) wrote : | #123 |
Good news from Canonical:
"It was confirmed by our Jockey developer that the Nvidia96 driver will be available in 12.04. However, no release date can be provided for the time being."
Algo (algo-lkma) wrote : | #124 |
I am still in 11.10.
Hope Nvidia96 driver will be available soon, so that I can enjoy those new features in 12.04!
giardia (fabriziosm) wrote : | #125 |
who tried the new nvidia96 drivers? im using the new release and i have a little more higher FPS (363 FPS against 235 of nouveau) maybe a faster performance but some visualization problems in firefox, for example in ubuntu forum pages and youtube search field is bit flickering; also in Totem, when i play mp3, the visual effects are shown with a line cutting the field from top right to bottom left. im using nvidia geforce2 mx400
also im using gnome-classic (no effect), because with effect, the frames of the windows arn't visible (with nouveau was working fine)
just another question: if i want to uninstall package libgl1-mesa-dri (it give 3D support for nouveau), it ask me to remove also xorg and ubuntu-desktop; should i leave installed, or should i remove from non-graphic mode and then reinstall xorg and ubuntu-desktop?
ps: about my comment #121 i managed to set the best resolution for my monitor adding a metamode in nvidia-settings
NoOp (glgxg) wrote : | #126 |
12.04 32bit 3.2.0-31-
GL_RENDERER = Quadro4 900 XGL/AGP/SSE2
GL_VERSION = 1.4 (1.5.8 NVIDIA 96.43.23)
Prior to modifying the xorg.conf (created by: 'sudo nvidia-xsconfig & then modified by 'gksu nvidia-settings' my ~/.xsession-errors was continuously being flooded with:
/usr/bin/compiz (core) - Warn: No GLXFBConfig for depth 32
warnings.
I modified the Screen settings in the xorg.conf to include:
Option "AddARGBGLXVisuals" "True"
Rebooted (just to be sure) & the messages are gone.
glxgears w/nouveau:
4005 frames in 5.0 seconds = 800.934 FPS
4248 frames in 5.0 seconds = 849.541 FPS
4240 frames in 5.0 seconds = 847.968 FPS
3910 frames in 5.0 seconds = 781.843 FPS
glxgears w/96.43.23:
13895 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2778.148 FPS
14700 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2937.791 FPS
14096 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2818.622 FPS
14580 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2914.800 FPS
NoOp (glgxg) wrote : | #127 |
- 96.43.23 xorg.conf (reference only) Edit (1.7 KiB, text/plain)
My xorg.conf is attached for reference.
NoOp (glgxg) wrote : | #128 |
David Ellis (dr-ellis) wrote : | #129 |
NVIDIA's 96.43.23 (32 bit) works for me on an ASUS 8170 GeForce4 MX 440.
My only issue was "The distribution-
giardia (fabriziosm) wrote : | #130 |
i hope nvidia96 will be available in ubuntu's repo, everythime they release a new kernel (that is happening more often nowadays) i have to install again the driver; also i receive updates about xorg recently, when i restart, the pc was in a loop at login, so i restart in safe mode, and to solve i removed and installed again the nvidia.run, it said the driver was corrupted by a recent installation and give the error /usr/lib/
Dave Stroud (bigdavesr) wrote : | #131 |
Is there any time line on updating the 96 driver. This also affects 1210?
giardia (fabriziosm) wrote : | #132 |
probably there is also a bug in the NVIDIA driver 96.43.23 installer, everytime I run NVIDIA driver script to compile the driver to upgrade/redo (xorg changes or whatever) , it deletes my installed libvdpau.so.1 I have to uninstall and reinstall libvdpau1 package through apt-get command. It's quite annoying when I want to use mplayer and gmplayer because of this error:
$ mplayer
mplayer: error while loading shared libraries: libvdpau.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
my /var/log/
$ cat nvidia-
-> Unable to restore symbolic link /usr/lib/
-> Unable to restore symbolic link /usr/lib/
libvdpau_
can somebody file a bug?
maybe affect also other nvidia installers, as i read on the net that the code to delete conflicting libvdpau files was added to recent versions of the installer where the package replaces it with its own. That shouldn't have been backported to the legacy driver series, since it doesn't install one.
NoOp (glgxg) wrote : | #133 |
@giardia: Interesting... I had not noticed because I hadn't run mplayer since the previous install of 96.43.23. So my log doesn't show the error. Now that I've reinstalled libvdpau, I suspect that the next reinstall of 96.43.23 will show the same.
However, I do see these:
$ cat nvidia-
-> Unable to restore symbolic link /usr/lib/
libGL.so.1.2 (File exists).
-> Unable to restore symbolic link /usr/lib/
libGL.so.1 (File exists).
-> Unable to restore symbolic link /usr/lib/
mesa/libGL.so (File exists).
$ locate libGL.so
/usr/lib/libGL.so
/usr/lib/libGL.so.1
/usr/lib/
$ ls -al /usr/lib/libGL.so*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Sep 27 16:50 /usr/lib/libGL.so -> libGL.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Sep 27 16:50 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.96.43.23
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 564468 Sep 27 16:50 /usr/lib/
$ ldd `which /usr/lib/
libGL.so.1 => /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 (0x00110000)
libGLcore.so.1 => /usr/lib/
$ ls -al /usr/lib/libGLcore*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Sep 27 16:50 /usr/lib/
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 8961144 Sep 27 16:50 /usr/lib/
After reinstalling all of my mesa packages:
$ locate libGL.so
/usr/lib/libGL.so
/usr/lib/libGL.so.1
/usr/lib/
/usr/lib/
/usr/lib/
/usr/lib/
/usr/lib/
$ ls -al /usr/lib/
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Sep 10 16:37 /usr/lib/
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Sep 10 16:37 /usr/lib/
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 358232 Sep 10 16:38 /usr/lib/
Flames_in_Paradise (ellisistfroh-deactivatedaccount) wrote : | #134 |
bugreport should contain PEBAC
vdpau is only ment for newer graphics cards. It was not even invented, when these cards were produced.
https:/
It is used to offlaod a portion of computing to the GPU :-)
NoOp (glgxg) wrote : | #135 |
Reinstalling all of my mesa packages borked my DRI:
$ LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose /usr/lib/
libGL: screen 0 does not appear to be DRI2 capable
libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/lib/
libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/lib/
libGL error: reverting to indirect rendering
OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation
OpenGL renderer string: Quadro4 900 XGL/AGP/SSE2
OpenGL version string: 1.4 (1.5.8 NVIDIA 96.43.23)
Reinstalled 96.43.23 & got DRI (and GL vertex buffer object) back.
@Flames: PEBAC? Were you trying for PEBKAC or similar?
I realize what vdpau is used for. However:
$ apt-cache depends mplayer | grep libvdpau
Depends: libvdpau1
@giardia: libvdpau1 error now appears on the 96.43.23 that I did. This is due to reinstalling libvdpau1 before the reintall:
$ cat /var/log/
WARNING: Unable to restore symbolic link /usr/lib/
-> libGL.so.1 (File exists).
WARNING: Unable to restore symbolic link /usr/lib/
Also reinstalled libvdpau1 to get mplayer working again. Thanks for tip.
Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-96 (Ubuntu Precise): | |
assignee: | nobody → Alberto Milone (albertomilone) |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
giardia (fabriziosm) wrote : | #136 |
@ NoOp
i have also the same warning
WARNING: Unable to restore symbolic link
WARNING: Unable to restore symbolic link /usr/lib/
-> libvdpau.so.1.0.0 (File exists).
WARNING: Unable to restore symbolic link
exists).
we know how to fix the first..
NoOp (glgxg) wrote : | #137 |
Alberto: Nvidia 96.43.23 has been released as certified by Nvidia:
<http://
Linux Display Driver - x86
Version:
96.43.23 Certified
Release Date:
2012.09.17
Operating System:
Linux
Language:
English (U.S.)
File Size:
17.4 MB
Will we ever see this version packaged for Precise?
Dave Stroud (bigdavesr) wrote : | #138 |
https:/
Jon Grossart (jon-grossart) wrote : | #139 |
Ha...just came here to say that I too had just found the updated nvidia-96 drives...which was released in Septemeber.
Please update precise so at least we have the full LTS cycle to use these old card/laptops with.
NoOp (glgxg) wrote : | #140 |
@Dave: thanks. Upstream (Debian) have as well:
<https:/
Published on 2012-09-19 <=== Sept 19 - two days after the 'Certified' nvidia release.
Changelog
nvidia-
<https:/
Currently I'm installing from the NVIDIA-
opera (opera2) wrote : | #141 |
Do you have any plans to release an updated package?
Without the nvidia driver I can't use the native resolution for my screen. That's a bit annoying.
Colin Watson (cjwatson) wrote : Please test proposed package | #142 |
Hello Jean-Baptiste, or anyone else affected,
Accepted nvidia-
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/
Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-96 (Ubuntu Precise): | |
status: | Confirmed → Fix Committed |
tags: | removed: verification-done |
tags: | added: verification-needed |
NoOp (glgxg) wrote : | #143 |
Thanks Colin! Works for me: (Note: I've not tried with Unity as it's not supported with this card/driver)
$ sudo lshw -C display
*-display
description: VGA compatible controller
product: NV25GL [Quadro4 900 XGL]
vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@0000:01:00.0
version: a3
width: 32 bits
clock: 66MHz
resources: irq:16 memory:
$ jockey-text -l
kmod:martian_dev - Agere 164x dsp driver (Free, Enabled, In use)
xorg:nvidia_96 - NVIDIA accelerated graphics driver (Proprietary, Enabled, In use)
$ apt-cache policy nvidia-96
nvidia-96:
Installed: 96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1
Candidate: 96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1
Version table:
*** 96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1 0
500 http://
100 /var/lib/
96.
500 http://
$ /usr/lib/
OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation
OpenGL renderer string: Quadro4 900 XGL/AGP/SSE2
OpenGL version string: 1.5.8 NVIDIA 96.43.23
Not software rendered: yes
Not blacklisted: yes
GLX fbconfig: yes
GLX texture from pixmap: yes
GL npot or rect textures: yes
GL vertex program: yes
GL fragment program: no
GL vertex buffer object: yes
GL framebuffer object: no
GL version is 1.4+: yes
Unity 3D supported: no
$ glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
10114 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2021.769 FPS
10893 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2178.501 FPS
10874 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2174.723 FPS
10618 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2112.233 FPS
Previous driver installed was the direct NVIDIA-
96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1 went in without any problems at all. Thanks again!
Mark Lila (mark-lilas) wrote : | #145 |
Works for me too on a clean install:
$ sudo lshw -C display
[sudo] password for ml1:
*-display
description: VGA compatible controller
product: NV28 [GeForce4 Ti 4200 Go AGP 8x]
vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@0000:01:00.0
version: a1
width: 32 bits
clock: 66MHz
vga_palette cap_list rom
resources: irq:11 memory:
$ jockey-text -l
xorg:nvidia_96 - NVIDIA accelerated graphics driver (Proprietary,
Enabled, In use)
$ apt-cache policy nvidia-96
nvidia-96:
Installed: 96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1
Candidate: 96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1
Version table:
*** 96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1 0
100 /var/lib/
96.
500 http://
Packages
$ /usr/lib/
OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation
OpenGL renderer string: GeForce4 4200 Go/AGP/SSE2
OpenGL version string: 1.5.8 NVIDIA 96.43.23
Not software rendered: yes
Not blacklisted: yes
GLX fbconfig: yes
GLX texture from pixmap: yes
GL npot or rect textures: yes
GL vertex program: yes
GL fragment program: no
GL vertex buffer object: yes
GL framebuffer object: no
GL version is 1.4+: yes
Unity 3D supported: no
$ glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
13663 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2732.545 FPS
Bib (bybeu) wrote : | #146 |
Ok here, it just works: I had to unlock xorg's previous version from /etc/apt/
Hibernation still brings to black screen on thaw after the 100% pages are shown reloaded
Bib (bybeu) wrote : | #147 |
Same issue when resume from suspend
Bib (bybeu) wrote : | #148 |
But gnome classic with effects now works :)
great job guys. Thank you
Bib (bybeu) wrote : | #149 |
HI Mark
I see we have the very same video. Please could you talk about sleep/hibernation with me at f0rhumatfreedotfr ?
Thank you
Here is my own report
$ sudo lshw -C display
[sudo] password for me:
*-display
description: VGA compatible controller
produit: NV28 [GeForce4 Ti 4200 Go AGP 8x]
fabriquant: NVIDIA Corporation
identifiant matériel: 0
information bus: pci@0000:01:00.0
version: a1
bits: 32 bits
horloge: 66MHz
ressources: irq:11 mémoire:
$ jockey-text -l
xorg:nvidia_96 - Pilote d'accélération graphique NVIDIA (Propriétaire, Activé, Utilisé)
$ apt-cache policy nvidia-96
nvidia-96:
Installé : 96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1
Candidat : 96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1
Table de version :
*** 96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1 0
400 http://
100 /var/lib/
96.
500 http://
$ /usr/lib/
OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation
OpenGL renderer string: GeForce4 4200 Go/AGP/SSE2
OpenGL version string: 1.5.8 NVIDIA 96.43.23
Not software rendered: yes
Not blacklisted: yes
GLX fbconfig: yes
GLX texture from pixmap: yes
GL npot or rect textures: yes
GL vertex program: yes
GL fragment program: no
GL vertex buffer object: yes
GL framebuffer object: no
GL version is 1.4+: yes
Unity 3D supported: no
$ glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
12872 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2574.231 FPS
Johannes Martin (jmartin-notamusica) wrote : | #150 |
Regarding suspend/hibernate issues: I have had this problem on various systems. It usually helps to switch to text mode (vt1) before suspend and back to graphics (vt7) after suspend. This can be automated using a script in /etc/pm/sleep.d:
/etc/pm/sleep.d$ cat 00-chvt
#!/bin/sh
case "$1" in
suspend|
chvt 1
;;
resume|thaw)
chvt 7
;;
esac
Mark Lila (mark-lilas) wrote : | #151 |
I just checked suspend/hibernate and they are both broken. I'm not sure
if suspend/hibernate would work with Nouveau or any other driver on this
Dell Inspiron 8500 better than with the latest nvidia-96. I haven't
used these features much so unfortunately I can't contribute further.
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013, at 09:33 AM, Bib wrote:
> HI Mark
> I see we have the very same video. Please could you talk about
> sleep/hibernation with me at f0rhumatfreedotfr ?
> Thank you
>
> Here is my own report
>
> $ sudo lshw -C display
> [sudo] password for me:
> *-display
> description: VGA compatible controller
> produit: NV28 [GeForce4 Ti 4200 Go AGP 8x]
> fabriquant: NVIDIA Corporation
> identifiant matériel: 0
> information bus: pci@0000:01:00.0
> version: a1
> bits: 32 bits
> horloge: 66MHz
> fonctionnalités: pm agp agp-3.0 vga_controller bus_master
> vga_palette cap_list rom
> configuration: driver=nvidia latency=248 maxlatency=1 mingnt=5
> ressources: irq:11 mémoire:
> mémoire:
> $ jockey-text -l
> xorg:nvidia_96 - Pilote d'accélération graphique NVIDIA (Propriétaire,
> Activé, Utilisé)
>
> $ apt-cache policy nvidia-96
> nvidia-96:
> Installé : 96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1
> Candidat : 96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1
> Table de version :
> *** 96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1 0
> 400 http://
> precise-
> 100 /var/lib/
> 96.43.20-0ubuntu6 0
> 500 http://
> Packages
> $ /usr/lib/
> OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation
> OpenGL renderer string: GeForce4 4200 Go/AGP/SSE2
> OpenGL version string: 1.5.8 NVIDIA 96.43.23
>
> Not software rendered: yes
> Not blacklisted: yes
> GLX fbconfig: yes
> GLX texture from pixmap: yes
> GL npot or rect textures: yes
> GL vertex program: yes
> GL fragment program: no
> GL vertex buffer object: yes
> GL framebuffer object: no
> GL version is 1.4+: yes
>
> Unity 3D supported: no
> $ glxgears
> Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
> approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
> 12872 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2574.231 FPS
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> nvidia-173 and nvidia-96 uninstallable on Precise
>
> Status in NVIDIA Drivers Ubuntu:
> New
> Status in “nvidia-
> Fix Released
> Status in “nvidia-
> Fix Released
> Status in “nvidia-
> Confirmed
> Status in “nvidia-
> Fix Released
> Status in “nvidia-
> Precise:
> Fix Released
> Status in “nvidia-
> Fix Committed
>
> Bug description:
> Package...
NoOp (glgxg) wrote : | #152 |
Updated my kernel today:
3.2.0-36-
and it was very nice not to have to run NVIDIA-
tags: |
added: verification-done removed: verification-needed |
Pjotr12345 (computertip) wrote : | #153 |
Thank you, developers! :)
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #154 |
This bug was fixed in the package nvidia-
---------------
nvidia-
* New upstream release
- updated to work with the xserver ABI. (LP: #948053)
-- Timo Aaltonen <email address hidden> Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:01:52 +0200
Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-96 (Ubuntu Precise): | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) wrote : | #155 |
Closing the bug for anything newer than precise. The driver has been removed from the archive because there is and won't be any updates from nvidia to make it work with newer xservers.
Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-96 (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Confirmed → Invalid |
Bib (bybeu) wrote : | #156 |
@ Johannes Martin
Hi Johannes, I tried your tip, not forgetting to chmod +x
It didn't worked neither for suspend nor hibernate, but at least I can see briefly on resume/thaw the console login screen.
pm-suspend.log doesn't seem to report any error when the wake-up fails.
When disabling your script (chmod -x), closing X session then issuing pm-suspend or pm-hibernate from console, both work fine (although no password is asked at wake-up, I get the console session opened), but switching Ctrl+Alt+F7 brings back to black screen, reverting to console impossible and Alt+PrtScn+K ineffective. Sometimes Alt+PrtScn+B reboots the laptop, sometimes not.
I wouldn't like to pollute more this thread. Should I post a new bug? And for which package pm/kelnel/
Thank you
description: | updated |
Johannes Martin (jmartin-notamusica) wrote : | #157 |
Regarding suspend/resume problems: I might help on certain graphics cards to etc /etc/default/grub:
# make sure we start in plain text mode
GRUB_CMDLINE_
# Uncomment to disable graphical terminal (grub-pc only)
GRUB_TERMINAL=
Suspend/resume works for me (01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation NV17 [GeForce4 440 Go] (rev a3)).
Bib (bybeu) wrote : | #158 |
Hmmm, mine is nv28
Still hangs. I already had "nosplash" and console, just had to insert noquiet.
I just thought I could have a 12.04 working. Don't mind, Johannes, thank although.
tags: | added: quantal |
Flames_in_Paradise (ellisistfroh-deactivatedaccount) wrote : | #159 |
hi!
@ searchfgolds67899:
a new bugreport bug1064192 was opened for Quantal, this one got closed. Therefore removing tag "quantal". Pls. try to get familiar with "How to report bugs ;-)
tags: | removed: quantal |
Flames_in_Paradise (ellisistfroh-deactivatedaccount) wrote : | #160 |
It does specifially not make much sense after the verification was done & the fix has been released.
Nixblicker (el-lunatico) wrote : | #161 |
Hello,
does anyone know whether it is safe for now (and the future) to update xserver-xorg and its dependencies to the newest versions without breaking compatibility with the nvidia-96 branch of gfx drivers?
I am so happy that I was able to make my old NV18 gpu running on a fresh install of LTS 12.04 Lubuntu after I experienced mysterious graphical glitches and severe system slowdowns with nouveau driver modules when I gave Lubuntu 12.10 a try.
It took me hours and hours of troubleshooting to find out, that the lack of support for legacy nvidia gpus was causing the hassle in the first place.
And now I am afraid of breaking the running system again with an update of the xserver, that is, if i got it right, on the brink to be updated to a new (and yet unsupported?!) ABI version.
What would you experts suggest? Fix a certain xserver version?
Thank you very much, especially those who helped to make nvidia-96 drivers working in 12.x releases!
Flames_in_Paradise (ellisistfroh-deactivatedaccount) wrote : | #162 |
hi Nixblicker
easy to answer:
producer-info: http://
Has NO support for XOrg-Server ABI 1.13 (which is the latest (lts-quantal)).
Read also comment #155 in this bugreport
> What would you experts suggest?
This is not a help Forum - it's for bugreporting. It's focusized on bugreporting and fixing.
Join in the discussion on the Nvidia-support forums.
I'm not an expert... :-) But it's time to make some thoughts about getting newer HW, i.e. The Nvidia 6200 (new or used), which fits in a AGP-slot is supported by the legacy driver 304. There is also a GT610 for the PCI-slot - but is worth to invest money in a energy consuming oldie?
Or stick with 12.04 LTS with 5 Years of support - enjoy the bug- and security fixes – +save some money over the time - take it when the LTS support ends and build yourself a newer system. Carefully selecting the components as the mobo. Which preferably has a multicore CPU to fit in & make a 64-bit version installable... AND a PCI-e slot for the graphics-card. So you could make some use of VDPAU or even CUDA (if needed). If u have some $$$ left, add a SSD ;_)
Every hardware has it's breakpoint (in terms of EOL of producers-support). AND YES it's great to have this supported in 12.04.2 – Thanks to the dev's!
Glad to see that Ubuntu is innovative.
piccobello (piccobello) wrote : | #163 |
My experience in a nutshell (using Kubuntu):
- I have an old machine with a GeForce FX 5200, which was working great with natty and the proprietary nvidia-173 driver, manually installed
- I don't care about 3D and effects, but watching movies with nouveau I had some annoying flickering horizontal lines
- after upgrading to precise I restored nouveau as the proprietary driver compalined about a missing file in /lib
- installing nvidia-173 (173.14.
In short, you can use GeForce FX 5200 with nvidia-173 in Kubuntu Precise
Thanks to all that contributed!
falippou joel (falippoujoel) wrote : | #164 |
i wanna have the nvidia-173 cause i can't have a good resolution whithout
Changed in nvidia-drivers-ubuntu: | |
status: | New → Fix Released |
This is known. There currently is no release in the -96 or 173 series which is compatible with our X.org server.
X.org team, do you know if there ever will be? If not, we can just as well remove these versions from the archive.