2016-01-19 01:14:07 |
Serge Hallyn |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
2016-01-19 01:14:17 |
Serge Hallyn |
numactl (Ubuntu): importance |
Undecided |
Medium |
|
2016-01-19 01:15:08 |
Serge Hallyn |
numactl (Ubuntu): status |
New |
Triaged |
|
2016-01-19 01:15:16 |
Serge Hallyn |
nominated for series |
|
Ubuntu Vivid |
|
2016-01-19 01:15:16 |
Serge Hallyn |
bug task added |
|
numactl (Ubuntu Vivid) |
|
2016-01-19 01:15:16 |
Serge Hallyn |
nominated for series |
|
Ubuntu Trusty |
|
2016-01-19 01:15:16 |
Serge Hallyn |
bug task added |
|
numactl (Ubuntu Trusty) |
|
2016-01-19 02:49:53 |
Launchpad Janitor |
numactl (Ubuntu): status |
Triaged |
Fix Released |
|
2016-02-18 19:53:06 |
Serge Hallyn |
description |
In bug 1358835 we applied a fix to supress a warning. The patch is different
from upstream (and appears wrong).
In particular,
+ if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(numa_nodes_ptr, node)) {
becomes
+ if (f) {
Switch to a straight cherrypick of the upstream patch. |
=============================================
SRU Justification
same justification as for bug 1358835. It would
be great to have the same test cases run as in that
bug.
=============================================
In bug 1358835 we applied a fix to supress a warning. The patch is different
from upstream (and appears wrong).
In particular,
+ if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(numa_nodes_ptr, node)) {
becomes
+ if (f) {
Switch to a straight cherrypick of the upstream patch. |
|
2016-02-18 19:55:01 |
Serge Hallyn |
description |
=============================================
SRU Justification
same justification as for bug 1358835. It would
be great to have the same test cases run as in that
bug.
=============================================
In bug 1358835 we applied a fix to supress a warning. The patch is different
from upstream (and appears wrong).
In particular,
+ if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(numa_nodes_ptr, node)) {
becomes
+ if (f) {
Switch to a straight cherrypick of the upstream patch. |
=============================================
SRU Justification
same justification as for bug 1358835. It would
be great to have the same test cases run as in that
bug.
The fix uploaded in that bug is wrong, in particular the diff between the two patches includes:
-+ if (f) {
++ if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(numa_nodes_ptr, node)) {
"if (f)" is a bogus test, f is simply an opened file.
=============================================
In bug 1358835 we applied a fix to supress a warning. The patch is different
from upstream (and appears wrong).
In particular,
+ if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(numa_nodes_ptr, node)) {
becomes
+ if (f) {
Switch to a straight cherrypick of the upstream patch. |
|
2016-02-18 19:55:14 |
Serge Hallyn |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team |
2016-02-18 21:09:43 |
Brian Murray |
numactl (Ubuntu Vivid): status |
New |
Won't Fix |
|
2016-02-18 21:09:50 |
Brian Murray |
nominated for series |
|
Ubuntu Wily |
|
2016-02-18 21:09:50 |
Brian Murray |
bug task added |
|
numactl (Ubuntu Wily) |
|
2016-02-18 21:16:47 |
Brian Murray |
numactl (Ubuntu Wily): status |
New |
Fix Committed |
|
2016-02-18 21:16:50 |
Brian Murray |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber SRU Verification |
2016-02-18 21:16:58 |
Brian Murray |
tags |
|
verification-needed |
|
2016-02-18 21:18:34 |
Brian Murray |
numactl (Ubuntu Trusty): status |
New |
Fix Committed |
|
2016-02-22 18:32:50 |
Serge Hallyn |
tags |
verification-needed |
verification-done |
|
2016-03-03 19:34:35 |
Launchpad Janitor |
numactl (Ubuntu Trusty): status |
Fix Committed |
Fix Released |
|
2016-03-03 19:34:43 |
Brian Murray |
removed subscriber Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team |
|
|
|
2016-03-03 19:35:00 |
Launchpad Janitor |
numactl (Ubuntu Wily): status |
Fix Committed |
Fix Released |
|