nullmailer should not directly conflict with lsb
Bug #660089 reported by
Todd Vierling
This bug affects 3 people
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
nullmailer (Debian) |
Fix Released
|
Unknown
|
|||
nullmailer (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Binary package hint: nullmailer
Yes, we know that the full LSB spec specifies that "-bs" be provided by the sendmail frontend. However, this interface is not supplied by ssmtp, nor is it supplied by the default lsb-invalid-mta (of course). I don't see why [only] nullmailer should have an explicit exclude entry against the simple "lsb" metapackage, contrary to what the Debian maintainers thought in 2004.
If this is really the desired conflict behavior, though, there's still a change required (the inverse: add the conflict to ssmtp).
Changed in nullmailer (Debian): | |
importance: | Undecided → Unknown |
status: | New → Unknown |
Changed in nullmailer (Debian): | |
status: | Unknown → Won't Fix |
Changed in nullmailer (Debian): | |
status: | Won't Fix → Confirmed |
Changed in nullmailer (Debian): | |
status: | Confirmed → Fix Released |
To post a comment you must log in.
What problem does this solve?