[SRU] Juju 2.3.2

[Nicholas Skaggs]

This syncs juju with the upstream release bringing the latest bugfixes and enhancements.

[SRU Information]
juju-core has a stable release exception, including for major version updates, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JujuUpdates.

[Impact]
A full list of targeted bugs can be seen against the milestone, and the intervening milestones:

https://launchpad.net/juju/+milestone/2.3.2

[QA/Testing]
Juju practices continuous integration and testing of the juju source tree. The results for this release can be seen here:

http://qa.jujucharms.com/releases/6159

In addition, juju has adt test coverage for all supported archs, http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/j/juju-core/.

Finally, manual verification and testing of the package has been done per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JujuUpdates

[Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (cyphermox)]

This affects netplan too in xenial (and by the same token, I'll land this SRU fix to artful as well).

Code is ready in git, just needs a proper "backport" of netplan to the affected releases.

[Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (cyphermox)]

To clarify: we need this SRU to land before we can make further updates to nplan, since nplan will start installing an /etc/network/interfaces file containing just a comment pointing to the new location of configurations in a netplan world, but that file might confuse juju.

This SRU includes the fixes to avoid having juju confused by /etc/network/interfaces.

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nplan/+bug/1744993.

[Brian Murray (brian-murray)]

Hello Nicholas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted juju-core into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-core/2.3.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed.Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested and change the tag from verification-needed-xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

[Nicholas Skaggs (nskaggs)]

I tested juju 2.3.2 and found it working, able to bootstrap, deploy, bash completion all work. I deployed a bionic controller and workload as well without any apparent issues.

[Launchpad Janitor (janitor)]

This bug was fixed in the package juju-core - 2.3.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1

---------------
juju-core (2.3.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1) xenial; urgency=medium

  * New upstream release. (LP: #1744968)

 -- Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <email address hidden> Wed, 07 Feb 2018 15:35:21 -0500

[Brian Murray (brian-murray)]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for juju-core has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

[Launchpad Janitor (janitor)]

This bug was fixed in the package nplan - 0.33

---------------
nplan (0.33) bionic; urgency=medium

  * replug: Do not unbind ath9kl_sdio. Thanks Oliver! (LP: #1741910)
  * doc: fix syntax for IPv6 example addresses. IPv6 needs to be escaped in
    YAML. (LP: #1735317)
  * debian/postinst: Write breadcrumbs on disk in /etc/network/interfaces to
    denote the migration to using netplan. (LP: #1744968)
  * bridge: implement port-priority support for the NM and networkd backends.
    (LP: #1735821)
  * doc: routes are not top-level but per-interface. (LP: #1726695)
  * Rework CLI parsing / code layout to better handle subcommands.

 -- Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <email address hidden> Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:32:47 -0500

[Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (cyphermox)]

Netplan SRU backport with these changes has already happened and the juju updates are now done via snaps AFAIK. Closing as Fix Released (Xenial has at least juju 2.3.7 in archive).