Comment 4 for bug 1818574

Vihai (daniele-orlandi) wrote :

Thank you Andreas, thank you Thomas, the workaround to depend on network-online.target is fine for me.

I agree with Thomas that freebinding is not the appropriate way to cope with binding to address that should deterministically be present on start of the service.

You have surely made all the detailed evaluations on whether to depend on network.target or network-online.target however in my situation the "principle of least surprise" has somewhat been defeated. I hope you will find a way to prevent other people in analog situations to fall in the same pitfalls.