Activity log for bug #1936902

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2021-07-20 07:35:29 Christian Ehrhardt  bug added bug
2021-07-20 07:35:38 Christian Ehrhardt  tags update-excuse
2021-07-20 07:35:47 Christian Ehrhardt  bug task added nftables (Ubuntu)
2021-07-20 07:38:00 Christian Ehrhardt  description The new nftables https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nftables/0.9.8-3 is stuck in proposed since it fails autopkgtest of firewalld https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/firewalld/impish/amd64 https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/amd64/f/firewalld/20210510_135128_36f9c@/log.gz https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/firewalld/impish/s390x https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/s390x/f/firewalld/20210510_131115_faeb7@/log.gz It fails the same way across architectures in: ## ------------------------ ## ## Summary of the failures. ## ## ------------------------ ## Failed tests: firewalld 0.9.3 test suite test groups: NUM: FILE-NAME:LINE TEST-GROUP-NAME KEYWORDS 97: icmp_block_in_forward_chain.at:1 ICMP block present FORWARD chain nftables icmp 124: rhbz1855140.at:1 rich rule icmptypes with one family nftables rich icmp rhbz1855140 The upstream issue tracker https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen does not list those cases, but there is a new v9.4.0 that we might try. In Debian this isn't showing up https://ci.debian.net/packages/f/firewalld/ Because they are all Skipped for not having machine level isolation https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/f/firewalld/13738304/log.gz Furthermore it is yet unclear if this is locally reproducible. The new nftables   https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nftables/0.9.8-3 is stuck in proposed since it fails autopkgtest of firewalld   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/firewalld/impish/amd64   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/amd64/f/firewalld/20210510_135128_36f9c@/log.gz   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/firewalld/impish/s390x   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/s390x/f/firewalld/20210510_131115_faeb7@/log.gz It fails the same way across architectures in: ## ------------------------ ## ## Summary of the failures. ## ## ------------------------ ## Failed tests: firewalld 0.9.3 test suite test groups:  NUM: FILE-NAME:LINE TEST-GROUP-NAME       KEYWORDS   97: icmp_block_in_forward_chain.at:1 ICMP block present FORWARD chain       nftables icmp  124: rhbz1855140.at:1 rich rule icmptypes with one family       nftables rich icmp rhbz1855140 The upstream issue tracker   https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen does not list those cases, but there is a new v9.4.0 that we might try. In Debian this isn't showing up   https://ci.debian.net/packages/f/firewalld/ Because they are all Skipped for not having machine level isolation   https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/f/firewalld/13738304/log.gz In detail it seems there re two cases of expected-output-mismatch in #97: -icmp type destination-unreachable icmp code host-prohibited reject with icmpx type admin-prohibited +icmp code host-prohibited reject with icmpx type admin-prohibited in #124: -icmpv6 type parameter-problem icmpv6 code no-route mark set mark & 0x00000086 ^ 0x00000086 +icmpv6 code no-route mark set mark & 0x00000086 ^ 0x00000086 Those look like they might have the same root cause. Furthermore it is yet unclear if this is locally reproducible.
2021-07-20 07:42:24 Christian Ehrhardt  description The new nftables   https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nftables/0.9.8-3 is stuck in proposed since it fails autopkgtest of firewalld   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/firewalld/impish/amd64   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/amd64/f/firewalld/20210510_135128_36f9c@/log.gz   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/firewalld/impish/s390x   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/s390x/f/firewalld/20210510_131115_faeb7@/log.gz It fails the same way across architectures in: ## ------------------------ ## ## Summary of the failures. ## ## ------------------------ ## Failed tests: firewalld 0.9.3 test suite test groups:  NUM: FILE-NAME:LINE TEST-GROUP-NAME       KEYWORDS   97: icmp_block_in_forward_chain.at:1 ICMP block present FORWARD chain       nftables icmp  124: rhbz1855140.at:1 rich rule icmptypes with one family       nftables rich icmp rhbz1855140 The upstream issue tracker   https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen does not list those cases, but there is a new v9.4.0 that we might try. In Debian this isn't showing up   https://ci.debian.net/packages/f/firewalld/ Because they are all Skipped for not having machine level isolation   https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/f/firewalld/13738304/log.gz In detail it seems there re two cases of expected-output-mismatch in #97: -icmp type destination-unreachable icmp code host-prohibited reject with icmpx type admin-prohibited +icmp code host-prohibited reject with icmpx type admin-prohibited in #124: -icmpv6 type parameter-problem icmpv6 code no-route mark set mark & 0x00000086 ^ 0x00000086 +icmpv6 code no-route mark set mark & 0x00000086 ^ 0x00000086 Those look like they might have the same root cause. Furthermore it is yet unclear if this is locally reproducible. The new nftables   https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nftables/0.9.8-3 is stuck in proposed since it fails autopkgtest of firewalld   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/firewalld/impish/amd64   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/amd64/f/firewalld/20210510_135128_36f9c@/log.gz   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/firewalld/impish/s390x   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/s390x/f/firewalld/20210510_131115_faeb7@/log.gz It fails the same way across architectures in: ## ------------------------ ## ## Summary of the failures. ## ## ------------------------ ## Failed tests: firewalld 0.9.3 test suite test groups:  NUM: FILE-NAME:LINE TEST-GROUP-NAME       KEYWORDS   97: icmp_block_in_forward_chain.at:1 ICMP block present FORWARD chain       nftables icmp  124: rhbz1855140.at:1 rich rule icmptypes with one family       nftables rich icmp rhbz1855140 The upstream issue tracker   https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen does not list those cases, but there is a new v9.4.0 that we might try. In Debian this isn't showing up   https://ci.debian.net/packages/f/firewalld/ Because they are all Skipped for not having machine level isolation   https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/f/firewalld/13738304/log.gz In detail it seems there re two cases of expected-output-mismatch in #97: -icmp type destination-unreachable icmp code host-prohibited reject with icmpx type admin-prohibited +icmp code host-prohibited reject with icmpx type admin-prohibited in #124: -icmpv6 type parameter-problem icmpv6 code no-route mark set mark & 0x00000086 ^ 0x00000086 +icmpv6 code no-route mark set mark & 0x00000086 ^ 0x00000086 Those look like they might have the same root cause. It seems that this is present for a while, this is nftables nftables/0.9.8-1 in Hirsute half a year ago. https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/f/firewalld/20210118_230221_66bea@/log.gz before nftables 0.9.8 it worked on 0.9.7-1: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/f/firewalld/20201101_064747_2b123@/log.gz TODO: - Furthermore it is yet unclear if this is locally reproducible. - this is old enough someone else might have debugged this but missed to file bugs?
2021-07-20 07:45:57 Christian Ehrhardt  description The new nftables   https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nftables/0.9.8-3 is stuck in proposed since it fails autopkgtest of firewalld   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/firewalld/impish/amd64   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/amd64/f/firewalld/20210510_135128_36f9c@/log.gz   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/firewalld/impish/s390x   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/s390x/f/firewalld/20210510_131115_faeb7@/log.gz It fails the same way across architectures in: ## ------------------------ ## ## Summary of the failures. ## ## ------------------------ ## Failed tests: firewalld 0.9.3 test suite test groups:  NUM: FILE-NAME:LINE TEST-GROUP-NAME       KEYWORDS   97: icmp_block_in_forward_chain.at:1 ICMP block present FORWARD chain       nftables icmp  124: rhbz1855140.at:1 rich rule icmptypes with one family       nftables rich icmp rhbz1855140 The upstream issue tracker   https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen does not list those cases, but there is a new v9.4.0 that we might try. In Debian this isn't showing up   https://ci.debian.net/packages/f/firewalld/ Because they are all Skipped for not having machine level isolation   https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/f/firewalld/13738304/log.gz In detail it seems there re two cases of expected-output-mismatch in #97: -icmp type destination-unreachable icmp code host-prohibited reject with icmpx type admin-prohibited +icmp code host-prohibited reject with icmpx type admin-prohibited in #124: -icmpv6 type parameter-problem icmpv6 code no-route mark set mark & 0x00000086 ^ 0x00000086 +icmpv6 code no-route mark set mark & 0x00000086 ^ 0x00000086 Those look like they might have the same root cause. It seems that this is present for a while, this is nftables nftables/0.9.8-1 in Hirsute half a year ago. https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/f/firewalld/20210118_230221_66bea@/log.gz before nftables 0.9.8 it worked on 0.9.7-1: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/f/firewalld/20201101_064747_2b123@/log.gz TODO: - Furthermore it is yet unclear if this is locally reproducible. - this is old enough someone else might have debugged this but missed to file bugs? The new nftables   https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nftables/0.9.8-3 is stuck in proposed since it fails autopkgtest of firewalld   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/firewalld/impish/amd64   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/amd64/f/firewalld/20210510_135128_36f9c@/log.gz   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/firewalld/impish/s390x   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/s390x/f/firewalld/20210510_131115_faeb7@/log.gz It fails the same way across architectures in: ## ------------------------ ## ## Summary of the failures. ## ## ------------------------ ## Failed tests: firewalld 0.9.3 test suite test groups:  NUM: FILE-NAME:LINE TEST-GROUP-NAME       KEYWORDS   97: icmp_block_in_forward_chain.at:1 ICMP block present FORWARD chain       nftables icmp  124: rhbz1855140.at:1 rich rule icmptypes with one family       nftables rich icmp rhbz1855140 The upstream issue tracker   https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen does not list those cases, but there is a new v9.4.0 that we might try. In Debian this isn't showing up   https://ci.debian.net/packages/f/firewalld/ Because they are all Skipped for not having machine level isolation   https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/f/firewalld/13738304/log.gz In detail it seems there re two cases of expected-output-mismatch in #97: -icmp type destination-unreachable icmp code host-prohibited reject with icmpx type admin-prohibited +icmp code host-prohibited reject with icmpx type admin-prohibited in #124: -icmpv6 type parameter-problem icmpv6 code no-route mark set mark & 0x00000086 ^ 0x00000086 +icmpv6 code no-route mark set mark & 0x00000086 ^ 0x00000086 Those look like they might have the same root cause. It seems that this is present for a while, this is nftables nftables/0.9.8-1 in Hirsute half a year ago.   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/f/firewalld/20210118_230221_66bea@/log.gz before nftables 0.9.8 it worked on 0.9.7-1: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/f/firewalld/20201101_064747_2b123@/log.gz With the right keywords I've found closed bugs in firewalld pointing to a nftables fix: - https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues/752 (thanks locutus for filing) - https://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=161221629204555&w=2 <- supposed to be the fix TODO: - Furthermore it is yet unclear if this is locally reproducible.
2021-07-20 07:47:11 Christian Ehrhardt  description The new nftables   https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nftables/0.9.8-3 is stuck in proposed since it fails autopkgtest of firewalld   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/firewalld/impish/amd64   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/amd64/f/firewalld/20210510_135128_36f9c@/log.gz   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/firewalld/impish/s390x   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/s390x/f/firewalld/20210510_131115_faeb7@/log.gz It fails the same way across architectures in: ## ------------------------ ## ## Summary of the failures. ## ## ------------------------ ## Failed tests: firewalld 0.9.3 test suite test groups:  NUM: FILE-NAME:LINE TEST-GROUP-NAME       KEYWORDS   97: icmp_block_in_forward_chain.at:1 ICMP block present FORWARD chain       nftables icmp  124: rhbz1855140.at:1 rich rule icmptypes with one family       nftables rich icmp rhbz1855140 The upstream issue tracker   https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen does not list those cases, but there is a new v9.4.0 that we might try. In Debian this isn't showing up   https://ci.debian.net/packages/f/firewalld/ Because they are all Skipped for not having machine level isolation   https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/f/firewalld/13738304/log.gz In detail it seems there re two cases of expected-output-mismatch in #97: -icmp type destination-unreachable icmp code host-prohibited reject with icmpx type admin-prohibited +icmp code host-prohibited reject with icmpx type admin-prohibited in #124: -icmpv6 type parameter-problem icmpv6 code no-route mark set mark & 0x00000086 ^ 0x00000086 +icmpv6 code no-route mark set mark & 0x00000086 ^ 0x00000086 Those look like they might have the same root cause. It seems that this is present for a while, this is nftables nftables/0.9.8-1 in Hirsute half a year ago.   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/f/firewalld/20210118_230221_66bea@/log.gz before nftables 0.9.8 it worked on 0.9.7-1: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/f/firewalld/20201101_064747_2b123@/log.gz With the right keywords I've found closed bugs in firewalld pointing to a nftables fix: - https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues/752 (thanks locutus for filing) - https://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=161221629204555&w=2 <- supposed to be the fix TODO: - Furthermore it is yet unclear if this is locally reproducible. The new nftables   https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nftables/0.9.8-3 is stuck in proposed since it fails autopkgtest of firewalld   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/firewalld/impish/amd64   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/amd64/f/firewalld/20210510_135128_36f9c@/log.gz   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/firewalld/impish/s390x   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/s390x/f/firewalld/20210510_131115_faeb7@/log.gz It fails the same way across architectures in: ## ------------------------ ## ## Summary of the failures. ## ## ------------------------ ## Failed tests: firewalld 0.9.3 test suite test groups:  NUM: FILE-NAME:LINE TEST-GROUP-NAME       KEYWORDS   97: icmp_block_in_forward_chain.at:1 ICMP block present FORWARD chain       nftables icmp  124: rhbz1855140.at:1 rich rule icmptypes with one family       nftables rich icmp rhbz1855140 The upstream issue tracker   https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen does not list those cases, but there is a new v9.4.0 that we might try. In Debian this isn't showing up   https://ci.debian.net/packages/f/firewalld/ Because they are all Skipped for not having machine level isolation   https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/f/firewalld/13738304/log.gz In detail it seems there re two cases of expected-output-mismatch in #97: -icmp type destination-unreachable icmp code host-prohibited reject with icmpx type admin-prohibited +icmp code host-prohibited reject with icmpx type admin-prohibited in #124: -icmpv6 type parameter-problem icmpv6 code no-route mark set mark & 0x00000086 ^ 0x00000086 +icmpv6 code no-route mark set mark & 0x00000086 ^ 0x00000086 Those look like they might have the same root cause. It seems that this is present for a while, this is nftables nftables/0.9.8-1 in Hirsute half a year ago.   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/f/firewalld/20210118_230221_66bea@/log.gz before nftables 0.9.8 it worked on 0.9.7-1: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/f/firewalld/20201101_064747_2b123@/log.gz With the right keywords I've found closed bugs in firewalld pointing to a nftables fix: - https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues/752 (thanks locutus for filing) - https://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=161221629204555&w=2 <- supposed to be the fix The issue is locally reproducible in e.g. autopkgtest VM and thereby fixes can be tested the same way.
2021-07-20 07:49:38 Christian Ehrhardt  description The new nftables   https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nftables/0.9.8-3 is stuck in proposed since it fails autopkgtest of firewalld   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/firewalld/impish/amd64   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/amd64/f/firewalld/20210510_135128_36f9c@/log.gz   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/firewalld/impish/s390x   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/s390x/f/firewalld/20210510_131115_faeb7@/log.gz It fails the same way across architectures in: ## ------------------------ ## ## Summary of the failures. ## ## ------------------------ ## Failed tests: firewalld 0.9.3 test suite test groups:  NUM: FILE-NAME:LINE TEST-GROUP-NAME       KEYWORDS   97: icmp_block_in_forward_chain.at:1 ICMP block present FORWARD chain       nftables icmp  124: rhbz1855140.at:1 rich rule icmptypes with one family       nftables rich icmp rhbz1855140 The upstream issue tracker   https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen does not list those cases, but there is a new v9.4.0 that we might try. In Debian this isn't showing up   https://ci.debian.net/packages/f/firewalld/ Because they are all Skipped for not having machine level isolation   https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/f/firewalld/13738304/log.gz In detail it seems there re two cases of expected-output-mismatch in #97: -icmp type destination-unreachable icmp code host-prohibited reject with icmpx type admin-prohibited +icmp code host-prohibited reject with icmpx type admin-prohibited in #124: -icmpv6 type parameter-problem icmpv6 code no-route mark set mark & 0x00000086 ^ 0x00000086 +icmpv6 code no-route mark set mark & 0x00000086 ^ 0x00000086 Those look like they might have the same root cause. It seems that this is present for a while, this is nftables nftables/0.9.8-1 in Hirsute half a year ago.   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/f/firewalld/20210118_230221_66bea@/log.gz before nftables 0.9.8 it worked on 0.9.7-1: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/f/firewalld/20201101_064747_2b123@/log.gz With the right keywords I've found closed bugs in firewalld pointing to a nftables fix: - https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues/752 (thanks locutus for filing) - https://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=161221629204555&w=2 <- supposed to be the fix The issue is locally reproducible in e.g. autopkgtest VM and thereby fixes can be tested the same way. The new nftables   https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nftables/0.9.8-3 is stuck in proposed since it fails autopkgtest of firewalld   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/firewalld/impish/amd64   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/amd64/f/firewalld/20210510_135128_36f9c@/log.gz   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/firewalld/impish/s390x   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/s390x/f/firewalld/20210510_131115_faeb7@/log.gz It fails the same way across architectures in: ## ------------------------ ## ## Summary of the failures. ## ## ------------------------ ## Failed tests: firewalld 0.9.3 test suite test groups:  NUM: FILE-NAME:LINE TEST-GROUP-NAME       KEYWORDS   97: icmp_block_in_forward_chain.at:1 ICMP block present FORWARD chain       nftables icmp  124: rhbz1855140.at:1 rich rule icmptypes with one family       nftables rich icmp rhbz1855140 The upstream issue tracker   https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen does not list those cases, but there is a new v9.4.0 that we might try. In Debian this isn't showing up   https://ci.debian.net/packages/f/firewalld/ Because they are all Skipped for not having machine level isolation   https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/f/firewalld/13738304/log.gz In detail it seems there re two cases of expected-output-mismatch in #97: -icmp type destination-unreachable icmp code host-prohibited reject with icmpx type admin-prohibited +icmp code host-prohibited reject with icmpx type admin-prohibited in #124: -icmpv6 type parameter-problem icmpv6 code no-route mark set mark & 0x00000086 ^ 0x00000086 +icmpv6 code no-route mark set mark & 0x00000086 ^ 0x00000086 Those look like they might have the same root cause. It seems that this is present for a while, this is nftables nftables/0.9.8-1 in Hirsute half a year ago.   https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/f/firewalld/20210118_230221_66bea@/log.gz before nftables 0.9.8 it worked on 0.9.7-1: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/f/firewalld/20201101_064747_2b123@/log.gz With the right keywords I've found closed bugs in firewalld pointing to a nftables fix: - https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/issues/752 (thanks Costamagna/Michael for filing) - https://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=161221629204555&w=2 <- supposed to be the fix The issue is locally reproducible in e.g. autopkgtest VM and thereby fixes can be tested the same way.
2021-07-20 07:53:03 Christian Ehrhardt  nftables (Ubuntu): status New Triaged
2021-07-20 07:53:08 Christian Ehrhardt  firewalld (Ubuntu): status New Confirmed
2021-07-20 07:53:12 Christian Ehrhardt  firewalld (Ubuntu): status Confirmed Invalid
2021-07-20 12:24:21 Christian Ehrhardt  bug watch added https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991309
2021-07-20 12:24:21 Christian Ehrhardt  attachment added fix-lp-1936902-impish.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nftables/+bug/1936902/+attachment/5512234/+files/fix-lp-1936902-impish.debdiff
2021-07-20 12:29:40 Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot tags update-excuse patch update-excuse
2021-07-20 12:39:24 Christian Ehrhardt  bug task added nftables (Debian)
2021-07-20 13:53:30 Bug Watch Updater nftables (Debian): status Unknown Fix Committed
2021-07-20 23:09:18 Launchpad Janitor nftables (Ubuntu): status Triaged Fix Released
2021-08-20 15:58:22 Bug Watch Updater nftables (Debian): status Fix Committed Fix Released