NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

Bug #432934 reported by Mankeys
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
network-manager (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: network-manager

NetworkManager crashed.

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Date: Sat Sep 19 09:26:54 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ExecutablePath: /usr/sbin/NetworkManager
Gconf:

IfupdownConfig:
 auto lo
 iface lo inet loopback
IpRoute:
 89.74.103.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 89.74.103.186 metric 1
 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth1 scope link metric 1000
 default via 89.74.103.1 dev eth1 proto static
Package: network-manager 0.8~a~git.20090911t130220.4c77fa0-0ubuntu6
ProcCmdline: NetworkManager
ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-10.34-generic
RfKill:
 0: phy0: Wireless LAN
  Soft blocked: no
  Hard blocked: no
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0xedef43 <strlen+51>: mov (%eax),%ecx
 PC (0x00edef43) ok
 source "(%eax)" (0x00000058) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%ecx" ok
SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: network-manager
StacktraceTop:
 strlen () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
 g_key_file_set_string_list () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
 ?? ()
 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__POINTER ()
Title: NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-10-generic i686
UserGroups:

WpaSupplicantLog:

Revision history for this message
Mankeys (mankeys) wrote :
visibility: private → public
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #425985, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.