Activity log for bug #1855009

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2019-12-03 22:37:52 Dan Streetman bug added bug
2019-12-03 22:38:21 Dan Streetman nominated for series Ubuntu Xenial
2019-12-03 22:38:21 Dan Streetman bug task added network-manager (Ubuntu Xenial)
2019-12-03 22:38:21 Dan Streetman nominated for series Ubuntu Eoan
2019-12-03 22:38:21 Dan Streetman bug task added network-manager (Ubuntu Eoan)
2019-12-03 22:38:21 Dan Streetman nominated for series Ubuntu Bionic
2019-12-03 22:38:21 Dan Streetman bug task added network-manager (Ubuntu Bionic)
2019-12-03 22:38:21 Dan Streetman nominated for series Ubuntu Focal
2019-12-03 22:38:21 Dan Streetman bug task added network-manager (Ubuntu Focal)
2019-12-03 22:38:21 Dan Streetman nominated for series Ubuntu Disco
2019-12-03 22:38:21 Dan Streetman bug task added network-manager (Ubuntu Disco)
2019-12-03 22:38:50 Dan Streetman network-manager (Ubuntu Xenial): status New In Progress
2019-12-03 22:38:52 Dan Streetman network-manager (Ubuntu Bionic): status New In Progress
2019-12-03 22:38:56 Dan Streetman network-manager (Ubuntu Focal): status New In Progress
2019-12-03 22:39:03 Dan Streetman network-manager (Ubuntu Focal): importance Undecided Medium
2019-12-03 22:39:08 Dan Streetman network-manager (Ubuntu Bionic): importance Undecided Medium
2019-12-03 22:39:22 Dan Streetman network-manager (Ubuntu Bionic): assignee Dan Streetman (ddstreet)
2019-12-03 22:39:28 Dan Streetman network-manager (Ubuntu Eoan): assignee Dan Streetman (ddstreet)
2019-12-03 22:39:28 Dan Streetman network-manager (Ubuntu Xenial): assignee Dan Streetman (ddstreet)
2019-12-03 22:39:30 Dan Streetman network-manager (Ubuntu Disco): assignee Dan Streetman (ddstreet)
2019-12-03 22:39:39 Dan Streetman network-manager (Ubuntu Eoan): importance Undecided Medium
2019-12-03 22:39:40 Dan Streetman network-manager (Ubuntu Disco): importance Undecided Medium
2019-12-03 22:39:42 Dan Streetman network-manager (Ubuntu Xenial): importance Undecided Medium
2019-12-03 22:39:44 Dan Streetman network-manager (Ubuntu Disco): status New In Progress
2019-12-03 22:39:46 Dan Streetman network-manager (Ubuntu Eoan): status New In Progress
2019-12-03 22:39:57 Dan Streetman network-manager (Ubuntu Focal): assignee Dan Streetman (ddstreet)
2019-12-04 19:57:40 Dan Streetman description [impact] most or all autopkgtests fail on s390x [test case] check autopkgtest logs, e.g. http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/network-manager https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/s390x/n/network-manager/20191130_001946_a5512@/log.gz [regression potential] TBD [impact] all autopkgtests fail on s390x [test case] check autopkgtest logs, e.g. http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/network-manager https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/s390x/n/network-manager/20191130_001946_a5512@/log.gz autopkgtest [00:19:32]: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ summary wpa-dhclient FAIL non-zero exit status 1 nm.py FAIL non-zero exit status 1 killswitches-no-urfkill FAIL non-zero exit status 1 urfkill-integration FAIL non-zero exit status 1 [regression potential] this essentially skips all the autopkgtests for network-manager on s390x, so regressions could occur now or in the future due to lack of testing on s390x. However, all the tests already fail on s390x and have since xenial (or earlier), so there hasn't been any useful test coverage on s390x before; this doesn't change that. [other info] The 'wpa-dhclient' test is specific to wireless, and both 'killswitches-no-urfkill' and 'urfkill-integration' require rfkill which requires wireless, so none of those tests are valid on s390x, since it doesn't have any wireless support. However the 'nm.py' test does have some test cases that don't rely on wireless capability, but it would be much more intrusive to update the test to split out wired vs. wireless testing, and that might introduce test regressions on other archs. The use case for network-manager on s390x in general is questionable, since s390x has no wireless support and obviously is never 'mobile', which are 2 main reasons to use network-manager instead of systemd-networkd.
2019-12-04 19:58:34 Dan Streetman description [impact] all autopkgtests fail on s390x [test case] check autopkgtest logs, e.g. http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/network-manager https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/s390x/n/network-manager/20191130_001946_a5512@/log.gz autopkgtest [00:19:32]: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ summary wpa-dhclient FAIL non-zero exit status 1 nm.py FAIL non-zero exit status 1 killswitches-no-urfkill FAIL non-zero exit status 1 urfkill-integration FAIL non-zero exit status 1 [regression potential] this essentially skips all the autopkgtests for network-manager on s390x, so regressions could occur now or in the future due to lack of testing on s390x. However, all the tests already fail on s390x and have since xenial (or earlier), so there hasn't been any useful test coverage on s390x before; this doesn't change that. [other info] The 'wpa-dhclient' test is specific to wireless, and both 'killswitches-no-urfkill' and 'urfkill-integration' require rfkill which requires wireless, so none of those tests are valid on s390x, since it doesn't have any wireless support. However the 'nm.py' test does have some test cases that don't rely on wireless capability, but it would be much more intrusive to update the test to split out wired vs. wireless testing, and that might introduce test regressions on other archs. The use case for network-manager on s390x in general is questionable, since s390x has no wireless support and obviously is never 'mobile', which are 2 main reasons to use network-manager instead of systemd-networkd. [impact] all autopkgtests fail on s390x [test case] check autopkgtest logs, e.g. http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/network-manager https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/s390x/n/network-manager/20191130_001946_a5512@/log.gz autopkgtest [00:19:32]: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ summary wpa-dhclient FAIL non-zero exit status 1 nm.py FAIL non-zero exit status 1 killswitches-no-urfkill FAIL non-zero exit status 1 urfkill-integration FAIL non-zero exit status 1 [regression potential] this essentially skips all the autopkgtests for network-manager on s390x, so regressions could occur now or in the future due to lack of testing on s390x. However, all the tests already fail on s390x and have since xenial (or earlier), so there hasn't been any useful test coverage on s390x before; this doesn't change that. [other info] as mentioned in comment 2, wireless networking is specifically excluded on s390 systems: menuconfig WIRELESS bool "Wireless" depends on !S390 default y The 'wpa-dhclient' test is specific to wireless, and both 'killswitches-no-urfkill' and 'urfkill-integration' require rfkill which requires wireless, so none of those tests are valid on s390x, since it doesn't have any wireless support. However the 'nm.py' test does have some test cases that don't rely on wireless capability, but it would be much more intrusive to update the test to split out wired vs. wireless testing, and that might introduce test regressions on other archs. The use case for network-manager on s390x in general is questionable, since s390x has no wireless support and obviously is never 'mobile', which are 2 main reasons to use network-manager instead of systemd-networkd.
2019-12-04 20:00:35 Dan Streetman description [impact] all autopkgtests fail on s390x [test case] check autopkgtest logs, e.g. http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/network-manager https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/s390x/n/network-manager/20191130_001946_a5512@/log.gz autopkgtest [00:19:32]: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ summary wpa-dhclient FAIL non-zero exit status 1 nm.py FAIL non-zero exit status 1 killswitches-no-urfkill FAIL non-zero exit status 1 urfkill-integration FAIL non-zero exit status 1 [regression potential] this essentially skips all the autopkgtests for network-manager on s390x, so regressions could occur now or in the future due to lack of testing on s390x. However, all the tests already fail on s390x and have since xenial (or earlier), so there hasn't been any useful test coverage on s390x before; this doesn't change that. [other info] as mentioned in comment 2, wireless networking is specifically excluded on s390 systems: menuconfig WIRELESS bool "Wireless" depends on !S390 default y The 'wpa-dhclient' test is specific to wireless, and both 'killswitches-no-urfkill' and 'urfkill-integration' require rfkill which requires wireless, so none of those tests are valid on s390x, since it doesn't have any wireless support. However the 'nm.py' test does have some test cases that don't rely on wireless capability, but it would be much more intrusive to update the test to split out wired vs. wireless testing, and that might introduce test regressions on other archs. The use case for network-manager on s390x in general is questionable, since s390x has no wireless support and obviously is never 'mobile', which are 2 main reasons to use network-manager instead of systemd-networkd. [impact] all autopkgtests fail on s390x [test case] check autopkgtest logs, e.g. http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/network-manager https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/s390x/n/network-manager/20191130_001946_a5512@/log.gz autopkgtest [00:19:32]: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ summary wpa-dhclient FAIL non-zero exit status 1 nm.py FAIL non-zero exit status 1 killswitches-no-urfkill FAIL non-zero exit status 1 urfkill-integration FAIL non-zero exit status 1 [regression potential] this essentially skips all the autopkgtests for network-manager on s390x, so regressions could occur now or in the future due to lack of testing on s390x. However, all the tests already fail on s390x and have since xenial (or earlier), so there hasn't been any useful test coverage on s390x before; this doesn't change that. [other info] as mentioned in comment 2, wireless networking is specifically excluded on s390 systems: menuconfig WIRELESS         bool "Wireless"         depends on !S390         default y The 'wpa-dhclient' test is specific to wireless, and both 'killswitches-no-urfkill' and 'urfkill-integration' require rfkill which requires wireless, so none of those tests are valid on s390x, since it doesn't have any wireless support. However the 'nm.py' test does have some test cases that don't rely on wireless capability, but it would be much more intrusive to update the test to split out wired vs. wireless testing, and that might introduce test regressions on other archs. The use case for network-manager on s390x in general is questionable, since s390x has no wireless support and obviously is never 'mobile', which are 2 main reasons to use network-manager instead of systemd-networkd. Additionally, all tests are currently skipped on armhf due to the requirement for machine isolation (and armhf tests run in containers), so s390x is not the first arch to simply skip all network-manager autopkgtests.
2019-12-06 13:14:18 Dan Streetman tags block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-eoan block-proposed-xenial
2019-12-06 19:48:15 Brian Murray network-manager (Ubuntu Eoan): status In Progress Fix Committed
2019-12-06 19:48:19 Brian Murray bug added subscriber Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
2019-12-06 19:48:21 Brian Murray bug added subscriber SRU Verification
2019-12-06 19:48:25 Brian Murray tags block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-eoan block-proposed-xenial block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-eoan block-proposed-xenial verification-needed verification-needed-eoan
2019-12-06 20:29:12 Launchpad Janitor network-manager (Ubuntu Focal): status In Progress Fix Released
2019-12-06 21:02:42 Brian Murray network-manager (Ubuntu Disco): status In Progress Fix Committed
2019-12-06 21:02:48 Brian Murray tags block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-eoan block-proposed-xenial verification-needed verification-needed-eoan block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-eoan block-proposed-xenial verification-needed verification-needed-disco verification-needed-eoan
2019-12-06 21:10:22 Brian Murray network-manager (Ubuntu Bionic): status In Progress Fix Committed
2019-12-06 21:10:31 Brian Murray tags block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-eoan block-proposed-xenial verification-needed verification-needed-disco verification-needed-eoan block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-eoan block-proposed-xenial verification-needed verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-disco verification-needed-eoan
2019-12-06 21:14:53 Brian Murray network-manager (Ubuntu Xenial): status In Progress Fix Committed
2019-12-06 21:15:02 Brian Murray tags block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-eoan block-proposed-xenial verification-needed verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-disco verification-needed-eoan block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-eoan block-proposed-xenial verification-needed verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-disco verification-needed-eoan verification-needed-xenial
2019-12-07 16:11:29 Dan Streetman tags block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-eoan block-proposed-xenial verification-needed verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-disco verification-needed-eoan verification-needed-xenial block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-eoan block-proposed-xenial verification-done verification-done-bionic verification-done-disco verification-done-eoan verification-done-xenial
2020-01-30 12:11:27 Łukasz Zemczak tags block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-eoan block-proposed-xenial verification-done verification-done-bionic verification-done-disco verification-done-eoan verification-done-xenial block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-xenial verification-done verification-done-bionic verification-done-disco verification-done-eoan verification-done-xenial
2020-01-30 12:17:22 Łukasz Zemczak tags block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-xenial verification-done verification-done-bionic verification-done-disco verification-done-eoan verification-done-xenial block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-xenial verification-done-bionic verification-done-disco verification-done-xenial verification-needed verification-needed-eoan
2020-01-30 16:58:37 Dan Streetman tags block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-xenial verification-done-bionic verification-done-disco verification-done-xenial verification-needed verification-needed-eoan block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-xenial verification-done-bionic verification-done-disco verification-done-eoan verification-done-xenial verification-needed-eoan
2020-01-30 16:58:51 Dan Streetman tags block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-xenial verification-done-bionic verification-done-disco verification-done-eoan verification-done-xenial verification-needed-eoan block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-xenial verification-done-bionic verification-done-disco verification-done-eoan verification-done-xenial
2020-02-11 22:55:13 Brian Murray removed subscriber Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
2020-02-11 23:05:17 Launchpad Janitor network-manager (Ubuntu Eoan): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2020-03-03 10:09:37 Łukasz Zemczak bug added subscriber Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
2020-03-03 10:09:41 Łukasz Zemczak tags block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-xenial verification-done-bionic verification-done-disco verification-done-eoan verification-done-xenial block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-xenial verification-done-disco verification-done-eoan verification-done-xenial verification-needed verification-needed-bionic
2020-03-04 15:01:54 Dan Streetman tags block-proposed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-xenial verification-done-disco verification-done-eoan verification-done-xenial verification-needed verification-needed-bionic block-proposed-disco block-proposed-xenial verification-done verification-done-bionic verification-done-disco verification-done-eoan verification-done-xenial
2020-03-04 15:02:34 Dan Streetman network-manager (Ubuntu Disco): status Fix Committed Won't Fix
2020-03-11 21:13:18 Launchpad Janitor network-manager (Ubuntu Bionic): status Fix Committed Fix Released
2020-03-12 08:06:15 Marko Preuss bug added subscriber Marko Preuss
2020-11-17 15:38:13 Dan Streetman network-manager (Ubuntu Xenial): assignee Dan Streetman (ddstreet)