On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Alexander Sack <email address hidden> wrote:
> the issue here would be that / and /usr still cannot be remote mounts right?
>
> will those cases be worse off before when using this patch?
I can do some testing of those cases next week, I suppose.
What should be clear, though, is that NFS mounted / and /usr are
subsets of all NFS mounts out there.
I _suspect_ that NFS mount / and /usr are a distinct minority of NFS mounts.
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Alexander Sack <email address hidden> wrote:
> the issue here would be that / and /usr still cannot be remote mounts right?
>
> will those cases be worse off before when using this patch?
I can do some testing of those cases next week, I suppose.
What should be clear, though, is that NFS mounted / and /usr are
subsets of all NFS mounts out there.
I _suspect_ that NFS mount / and /usr are a distinct minority of NFS mounts.
:-Dustin