Clarifying http entries in /etc/services

Bug #694894 reported by jhansonxi
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
netbase (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: netbase

Port 8080 has the name "http-alt". The problem is that "http-alt" is not unique on IANA's list as it is shared with 8008 and 591:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers

Wikipedia has different name assignments:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers

RedHat implies a few more:
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Managing_Confined_Services/sect-Managing_Confined_Services-Configuration_examples-Changing_port_numbers.html

I recommend the following changes and additions:
http-alt 8008 # Alternate HTTP
http_alt 8080 webcache # WWW Caching service
http_alt_alt 8090 # Alternate HTTP

These being all unofficial there isn't any hard rule for their names/assignments and there are plenty of exceptions. There are a lot of firewall "help" sites that list the ones I'm recommending but I'm unsure if they are using different sources or just using Wikipedia's list. Deciding a popularity contest with Google isn't ideal but I'm more concerned with uniqueness in the service names versus popular usage.

8090 is used by Tsung/IDX-Tsunami but it's not in Ubuntu/Debian
http://tsung.erlang-projects.org/user_manual.html#htoc22

VLC uses 8080 for streaming over http.

This was reported upstream:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608159

Revision history for this message
Stéphane Graber (stgraber) wrote :

Syncing with Debian's status. 8090 seem to have been dropped, leaving just one http-alt now.

Changed in netbase (Ubuntu):
status: New → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.