Ubuntu
ndiswrapper package

ndiswrapper-dkms 1.57-1ubuntu1: ndiswrapper kernel module failed to build

Bug #1092699 reported by Henry Heinonen on 2012-12-20

This bug report is a duplicate of: Bug #1023645: ndiswrapper-dkms 1.57-1ubuntu1: ndiswrapper kernel module failed to build [error: ‘struct kernel_stat’ has no member named ‘cpustat’]. Edit Remove

This bug affects 1 person

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	ndiswrapper (Ubuntu)	New	Undecided	Unassigned

Bug Description

ndiswrapper says: WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist, it will be ignored in a future release.
FATAL: Module ndiswrapper not found.
Ubuntu 12.10

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: ndiswrapper-dkms 1.57-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-19.30-generic 3.5.7
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-19-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu9
Architecture: amd64
DKMSKernelVersion: 3.5.0-21-generic
Date: Thu Dec 20 23:32:53 2012
InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-11-28 (22 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Release amd64 (20121017.5)
MarkForUpload: True
PackageArchitecture: all
PackageVersion: 1.57-1ubuntu1
SourcePackage: ndiswrapper
Title: ndiswrapper-dkms 1.57-1ubuntu1: ndiswrapper kernel module failed to build
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

Tags:

Revision history for this message

Henry Heinonen (aanriboi) wrote on 2012-12-20:

DKMSBuildLog.txt Edit (1.8 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Dependencies.txt Edit (1.2 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
DuplicateSignature.txt Edit (1.8 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")

Apport retracing service (apport) on 2012-12-25

tags:

removed: need-duplicate-check

Revision history for this message

Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt) wrote on 2013-01-01:

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1023645, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Feel free to continue to report any other bugs you may find.