nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_get()

Bug #940377 reported by Leonardo Corato
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
nautilus (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Description: Ubuntu precise (development branch)
Release: 12.04

nautilus:
  Installed: 1:3.3.90-0ubuntu2
  Candidate: 1:3.3.90-0ubuntu2
  Version table:
 *** 1:3.3.90-0ubuntu2 0
        500 http://ubuntu.inode.at/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

Opening it crashed.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: nautilus 1:3.3.90-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.26-generic 3.2.6
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 1.93-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
CheckboxSubmission: a1c955fd38d4502805ce6f6dc842fe78
CheckboxSystem: 2a6f54df59af338184485e85cbcf0d32
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Fri Feb 24 16:15:43 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus
GsettingsChanges:
 org.gnome.nautilus.window-state geometry '1132x792+546+24'
 org.gnome.nautilus.window-state sidebar-width 184
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Beta amd64 (20110901)
ProcCmdline: nautilus -n
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7ff31072dc33 <g_object_get+99>: mov (%rbx),%rax
 PC (0x7ff31072dc33) ok
 source "(%rbx)" (0xaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%rax" ok
SegvReason: reading unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: nautilus
StacktraceTop:
 g_object_get () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 ?? ()
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 g_main_context_dispatch () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_get()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-02-20 (4 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
Leonardo Corato (leocor) wrote :
visibility: private → public
Revision history for this message
Leonardo Corato (leocor) wrote :

.

Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #929031, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.