nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() - when moving a file betweenleft and right panes

Bug #800540 reported by Jean Greg
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
nautilus (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

This a the same bug as 796520 bt this time with a crash report.

I open Nautilus
I go to some directory
I press F3 to get the extra pane
In the left pane I move to another directory (on a different drive)
I drag a directory from the right pane to the left pane, it is being copeid correctly but crashes at the end.
Detail: just before crashing, the soon-to-be-removed directory icon turn to a text file icon

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: nautilus 1:2.32.2.1-0ubuntu13
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: amd64
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Wed Jun 22 09:59:24 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release amd64 (20110427.1)
ProcCmdline: nautilus
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=fr_FR:en
 LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x4d4b0e: mov 0x18(%rdi),%rdx
 PC (0x004d4b0e) ok
 source "0x18(%rdi)" (0x00000018) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%rdx" ok
SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: nautilus
StacktraceTop:
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
Jean Greg (jg-foulon) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #711429, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.