| 2006-04-07 08:55:41 |
Benedikt |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2006-04-07 09:51:11 |
Sebastien Bacher |
nautilus: status |
Unconfirmed |
Confirmed |
|
| 2006-04-07 09:51:11 |
Sebastien Bacher |
nautilus: assignee |
|
desktop-bugs |
|
| 2006-04-07 09:51:11 |
Sebastien Bacher |
nautilus: severity |
Normal |
Minor |
|
| 2006-04-07 09:51:11 |
Sebastien Bacher |
nautilus: statusexplanation |
|
Thank you for your bug. Does making a jpg template makes sense? That directory is for the context menu "new document" action. Anyway it should not eat that much cpu if standard preview is fast, I've forwarded it upstream: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337607 |
|
| 2006-04-07 09:51:25 |
Sebastien Bacher |
bug |
|
|
assigned to nautilus (upstream) |
| 2006-06-15 06:52:00 |
Bug Watch Updater |
nautilus: status |
Unconfirmed |
Confirmed |
|
| 2006-06-17 06:34:50 |
Bug Watch Updater |
nautilus: status |
Confirmed |
Fix Released |
|
| 2006-06-17 17:09:38 |
Sebastien Bacher |
nautilus: status |
Confirmed |
Fix Committed |
|
| 2006-06-17 17:09:38 |
Sebastien Bacher |
nautilus: statusexplanation |
Thank you for your bug. Does making a jpg template makes sense? That directory is for the context menu "new document" action. Anyway it should not eat that much cpu if standard preview is fast, I've forwarded it upstream: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337607 |
fixed upstream |
|
| 2006-07-11 09:29:42 |
Sebastien Bacher |
nautilus: status |
Fix Committed |
Fix Released |
|
| 2006-07-11 09:29:42 |
Sebastien Bacher |
nautilus: statusexplanation |
fixed upstream |
fixed to edgy |
|
| 2010-05-11 19:37:09 |
Curtis Hovey |
removed subscriber Registry Administrators |
|
|
|
| 2010-09-16 00:47:31 |
Bug Watch Updater |
nautilus: importance |
Unknown |
High |
|
| 2010-09-16 05:43:34 |
Benedikt |
removed subscriber Benedikt |
|
|
|
