Upgrade to 3.26.4 and SRU it

Bug #1782681 reported by Marco Trevisan (Treviño) on 2018-07-20
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
nautilus (Ubuntu)
Marco Trevisan (Treviño)
Marco Trevisan (Treviño)

Bug Description

[ Description ]

The 4th stable release in the 3.26 series.

[ QA ]

Run Ubuntu session, expect nautilus to work normally doing various file management operations


[ Regresison potential ]

Various fixes backported, most of them already in ubuntu. Some changes to directory listing might need attention when using nautilus in list-view.

Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package nautilus - 1:3.26.4-0ubuntu1

nautilus (1:3.26.4-0ubuntu1) cosmic; urgency=medium

  * New upstream release: 3.26.4 (LP: #1782681, LP: #1765776)
  * debian/patches/query-add-recursive-flags-and-use-it-in-search-engines.patch,
    - Follow nautilus settings to search only in current folder (LP: #1767027).
      This doesn't apply to gnome-shell search provider for indexed searches.
  * debian/patches/0017-recent-add-function-to-update-manager-on-file-rename.patch:
    - Updated to respect upstream requested changes
  * debian/patches/nautilusgtkplacesview-show-error-if-volume-is-not-mounted.patch:
    - don't crash if selecting a volume that is not mounted (LP: #1764779)
  * debian/patches/Revert-Revert-files-view-Remove-new-empty-folder-name-sug.patch,
    - Reverts the reverts introduced in as they are in ubuntu already
  * debian/patches/clear_pending_selection.patch,
    - Patches removed as they are already applied upstream

 -- Marco Trevisan (Treviño) <email address hidden> Fri, 20 Jul 2018 04:52:45 +0200

Changed in nautilus (Ubuntu):
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Is there any reason why suddenly the version number for the SRU is 1:3.26.4-0~ubuntu18.04.1 ? Not sure we ever had a scheme like this before. To me it seems like the security-team's versioning of 1:3.26.4-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 would fit better and be more consistent with what we have in other series.

If there is a specific reason for that, please mention it here and re-upload. If not, I would like to request changing the version number and re-uploading. Usually I change versioning myself and re-upload during review, but I have been informed that for desktop packages this interferes with some internal tooling, so rejecting this instead.

If there is no specific reason for the versioning and you do *not* wish to change the versioning scheme, please find a different SRU member who might have a different opinion.

Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

...I actually see this is some versioning scheme used by the desktop team for gnome-related packages (just saw it in mutter as well). Seeing that Robie approved of uploads with this versioning fir mutter, I suppose you can re-upload it without changing the version number...

Since this versioning was used in some other packages, I've used this, but if you prefer another versioning we can change that.

I've not strong opinions on that, just I find this more readable.

Changed in nautilus (Ubuntu Bionic):
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
status: New → In Progress
importance: Wishlist → High
assignee: nobody → Marco Trevisan (Treviño) (3v1n0)

Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nautilus into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/1:3.26.4-0~ubuntu18.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed.Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested and change the tag from verification-needed-bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

Changed in nautilus (Ubuntu Bionic):
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic

Verification done as package is installable from proposed.

No further tests are needed here.

tags: added: verification-done verification-done-bionic
removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers