nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in __GI___open_catalog()

Bug #1206637 reported by cacula
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
nautilus (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

directly after boot

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
Package: nautilus 1:3.8.2-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.10.0-6.17-generic 3.10.3
Uname: Linux 3.10.0-6-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.11-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Thu Jul 25 21:14:29 2013
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus
GsettingsChanges: b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'geometry' b"'931x1030+785+136'"
InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-07-17 (13 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.10 "Saucy Salamander" - Alpha amd64 (20130716)
MarkForUpload: True
ProcCmdline: nautilus -n
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=de_DE
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
 LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: nautilus
StacktraceTop: __GI___open_catalog (cat_name=<Fehler beim Lesen der Variable: Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffffffffffbb>, cat_name@entry=<Fehler beim Lesen der Variable: Cannot access memory at address 0x8b>, nlspath=<Fehler beim Lesen der Variable: Cannot access memory at address 0x8b>, env_var=<Fehler beim Lesen der Variable: Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffffffffffb3>, env_var@entry=<Fehler beim Lesen der Variable: Cannot access memory at address 0x8b>, catalog=<Fehler beim Lesen der Variable: Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffffffffffa3>, catalog@entry=<Fehler beim Lesen der Variable: Cannot access memory at address 0x8b>) at open_catalog.c:109
Title: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in __GI___open_catalog()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo vboxusers
mtime.conffile..etc.xdg.autostart.nautilus.autostart.desktop: 2013-07-17T19:37:20.333941

Revision history for this message
cacula (cacula) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1202159, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private → Public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.