Comment 49 for bug 1273484

(In reply to Sam Kottler from comment #46)
> (In reply to Jean Gabès from comment #45)
> > Maybe packages names are outside trademark things, but don't play trademark
> > names without a legal dept that support you.
>
> The package name is a little more subjective in my opinion. I'm okay with it
> having nagios in the name because it's produced by Nagios Enterprises as was
> mentioned earlier.

What about a solution where:

* a 'monitoring-plugins-*' packages PROVIDES (on package management level) a 'nagios-plugins-*' package
* a metapackage (just without content) 'nagios-plugins-*' package REQUIRE/DEPEND (on package management level) in a 'monitoring-plugins-*' packages

The question is ... may this harm in trademark terms?

What about all this other 3rd party packages having 'nagios' in it's names or install pathes?