Comment 21 for bug 1273484

(In reply to Andy Brist from comment #15)
> (In reply to Sam Kottler from comment #14)
> > Agreed. I do not want to keep the package name the same and change the
> > Source0 to point to an upstream of a different name. Splitting the packages
> > apart and maintaining them separately; if everyone agrees that is a
> > reasonable path forward then I'll start doing the work to get that done in
> > rawhide and for EPEL 7. We can also work on getting that done for EPEL 6 and
> > Fedora 19/20 if people think it'd be fruitful.
> Can I presume that the splitting of the packages entails:
> 1) Retaining the current spec for "nagios-plugins" so that we may be able to
> release new versions under the current package name.

Yes, that's right.

> 2) Using a new package name and spec file for "monitoring-plugins" moving
> forward.


> ?
> > I hope my comments above provide a reasonable route to resolving this issue.
> > What do the two parties involved think?
> As do I. Regards.