Screen scales to grandma very unfriendly mode

Bug #1876530 reported by René Spies
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
mutter (Ubuntu)
Incomplete
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

When fractional scaling is active and set to 125% (I only tested this with 125%) and then the switch for fractional scaling is deactivated again, the screen scales well beyond the standard (and selected) 100%. Feels like 50% or less. This issue is removed when rebooting.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu14
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-28.32-generic 5.4.30
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-28-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sun May 3 00:35:53 2020
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: focal
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, including running git bisection searches
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation UHD Graphics 620 (Whiskey Lake) [8086:3ea0] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. UHD Graphics 620 (Whiskey Lake) [1043:16a1]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-30 (2 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
Lsusb:
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
 Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04f3:0903 Elan Microelectronics Corp. ELAN:Fingerprint
 Bus 001 Device 002: ID 13d3:56dc IMC Networks USB2.0 HD UVC WebCam
 Bus 001 Device 004: ID 8087:0aaa Intel Corp.
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
MachineType: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ZenBook UX392FA_UX392FA
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-28-generic root=UUID=cbcf9a35-a5f8-429f-adad-ad8f21bff5df ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
Symptom: display
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 07/17/2019
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: UX392FA.301
dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567
dmi.board.name: UX392FA
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
dmi.board.version: 1.0
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
dmi.chassis.version: 1.0
dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrUX392FA.301:bd07/17/2019:svnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:pnZenBookUX392FA_UX392FA:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnUX392FA:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:ct10:cvr1.0:
dmi.product.family: ZenBook
dmi.product.name: ZenBook UX392FA_UX392FA
dmi.product.version: 1.0
dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.101-2
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 20.0.4-2ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.8-2ubuntu2
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.99.917+git20200226-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.16-1

Revision history for this message
René Spies (rene-j-spies) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt) wrote :

Please run 'xrandr' in a Terminal both before and after the problem and paste the output from the command here.

affects: xorg (Ubuntu) → mutter (Ubuntu)
tags: added: xrandr-scaling
Changed in mutter (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
René Spies (rene-j-spies) wrote :
Download full text (3.9 KiB)

Before the problem
--
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1920 x 1080, maximum 16384 x 16384
eDP-1 connected primary 1920x1080+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 308mm x 173mm
   1920x1080 60.00*+ 59.97 59.96 59.93
   1680x1050 59.95 59.88
   1600x1024 60.17
   1400x1050 59.98
   1600x900 59.99 59.94 59.95 59.82
   1280x1024 60.02
   1440x900 59.89
   1400x900 59.96 59.88
   1280x960 60.00
   1440x810 60.00 59.97
   1368x768 59.88 59.85
   1360x768 59.80 59.96
   1280x800 59.99 59.97 59.81 59.91
   1152x864 60.00
   1280x720 60.00 59.99 59.86 59.74
   1024x768 60.04 60.00
   960x720 60.00
   928x696 60.05
   896x672 60.01
   1024x576 59.95 59.96 59.90 59.82
   960x600 59.93 60.00
   960x540 59.96 59.99 59.63 59.82
   800x600 60.00 60.32 56.25
   840x525 60.01 59.88
   864x486 59.92 59.57
   800x512 60.17
   700x525 59.98
   800x450 59.95 59.82
   640x512 60.02
   720x450 59.89
   700x450 59.96 59.88
   640x480 60.00 59.94
   720x405 59.51 58.99
   684x384 59.88 59.85
   680x384 59.80 59.96
   640x400 59.88 59.98
   576x432 60.06
   640x360 59.86 59.83 59.84 59.32
   512x384 60.00
   512x288 60.00 59.92
   480x270 59.63 59.82
   400x300 60.32 56.34
   432x243 59.92 59.57
   320x240 60.05
   360x202 59.51 59.13
   320x180 59.84 59.32
DP-1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
HDMI-1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
DP-2 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
HDMI-2 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)

--
after the problem
--
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 3072 x 1728, maximum 16384 x 16384
eDP-1 connected primary 3072x1728+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 308mm x 173mm
   1920x1080 60.00*+ 59.97 59.96 59.93
   1680x1050 59.95 59.88
   1600x1024 60.17
   1400x1050 59.98
   1600x900 59.99 59.94 59.95 59.82
   1280x1024 60.02
   1440x900 59.89
   1400x900 59.96 59.88
   1280x960 60.00
   1440x810 60.00 59.97
   1368x768 59.88 59.85
   1360x768 59.80 59.96
   1280x800 59.99 59.97 59.81 59.91
   1152x864 60.00
   1280x720 60.00 59.99 59.86 59.74
   1024x768 60.04 60.00
   960x720 60.00
   928x696 60.05
   896x672 60.01
   1024x576 59.95 59.96 59.90 59.82
   960x600 59.93 60.00
   960x540 59.96 59.99 59.63 59.82
   800x600 60.00 60.32 56.25
   840x525 60.01 59.88
   864x486 59.92 59.57
   800x512 60.17
   700x525 59.98
   800x450 59.95 59.82
   640x512 60.02
   720x450 59.8...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt) wrote :

Now tracking in bug 1875285.

Revision history for this message
Marco Trevisan (Treviño) (3v1n0) wrote :

While the effect seems duplicate of #1875285, I think this is more related to bug #1876894, and so marking duplicated of that.

However, to understand properly this the `xrandr` command should include the `--verbose` option, otherwise it's not too easy to get what's going on.

Revision history for this message
Marco Trevisan (Treviño) (3v1n0) wrote :

Actually no, ignore the point on duplicate (even this may be fixed by the changes included for that fix), but still would need better output.

Revision history for this message
Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt) wrote :

The data from the original reporter in comment #3 shows this is bug 1875285.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.