mesa: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'xutils, xlibmesa-gl-dev'
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
mesa (Debian) |
Fix Released
|
Unknown
|
|||
mesa (Ubuntu) |
Invalid
|
High
|
Adam Conrad |
Bug Description
Automatically imported from Debian bug report #326466 http://
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #1 |
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #2 |
Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 15:05:42 +0200
From: Andreas Jochens <email address hidden>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <email address hidden>
Subject: mesa: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'xutils, xlibmesa-gl-dev'
Package: mesa
Version: 6.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'mesa' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
touch depend
makedepend -fdepend -I. -I../../../include -I../..
/bin/sh: makedepend: command not found
make[2]: *** [depend] Error 127
make[2]: Leaving directory `/mesa-
Later in the build process I get the following error:
In file included from glcontextmodes.
../../.
to 'int' in declaration of '__GLXvisualConfig'
../../.
fore '*' token
glcontextmodes.
sualConfig'
glcontextmodes.
glcontextmodes.c: In function '_gl_copy_
glcontextmodes.
glcontextmodes.
glcontextmodes.
glcontextmodes.
make[2]: *** [glcontextmodes.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/mesa-
Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'xutils, xlibmesa-gl-dev'
to debian/control.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-
--- ../tmp-
+++ ./debian/control 2005-09-03 11:50:02.000000000 +0000
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Priority: extra
Maintainer: Marcelo E. Magallon <email address hidden>
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
-Build-Depends: lesstif2-dev, xlibs-dev, grep-dctrl, debhelper (>> 4), build-essential (>= 11), libdrm-dev, libdirectfb-dev
+Build-Depends: lesstif2-dev, xutils, xlibs-dev, xlibmesa-gl-dev, grep-dctrl, debhelper (>> 4), build-essential (>= 11), libdrm-dev, libdirectfb-dev
Package: mesag3
Section: libs
Adam Conrad (adconrad) wrote : | #3 |
This is not true of the Ubuntu mesa packages, only the Debian ones. Closing.
In Debian Bug tracker #326466, Marcelo E. Magallon (mmagallo) wrote : Re: Bug#326466: mesa: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'xutils, xlibmesa-gl-dev' | #4 |
Hi,
just a note before someone gets trigger happy about this bug and does
something idiotic.
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 03:05:42PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> When building 'mesa' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
> I get the following error:
>
> touch depend
> makedepend -fdepend -I. -I../../../include -I../..
> /bin/sh: makedepend: command not found
> make[2]: *** [depend] Error 127
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/mesa-
Ah, yes. That's right, thanks.
> In file included from glcontextmodes.
> ../../.
> to 'int' in declaration of '__GLXvisualConfig'
Uhm... glxint.h is missing upstream.
> Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'xutils, xlibmesa-gl-dev'
> to debian/control.
Just in case someone happens to develop an urge to fix this bug before
I upload a fixed package, PLEASE DON'T ADD A DEPENDENCY ON
xlibmesa-gl-dev. That's dumb, to put it mildly. Check out the svn
repo. (if you are messing with the mesa source package you should know
where the repo is)
--
Marcelo
In Debian Bug tracker #326466, Michel Daenzer (daenzer) wrote : Re: Bug#326466: mesa: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'xutils, xlibmesa-gl-dev' | #5 |
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 10:27 -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
>
> > In file included from glcontextmodes.
> > ../../.
> > to 'int' in declaration of '__GLXvisualConfig'
>
> Uhm... glxint.h is missing upstream.
>
> > Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'xutils, xlibmesa-gl-dev'
> > to debian/control.
>
> Just in case someone happens to develop an urge to fix this bug before
> I upload a fixed package, PLEASE DON'T ADD A DEPENDENCY ON
> xlibmesa-gl-dev. That's dumb, to put it mildly. Check out the svn
> repo. (if you are messing with the mesa source package you should know
> where the repo is)
The current upstream plan seems to be to put glxint.h (along with a
bunch of other GL headers) into the proto/GL module as of X.Org 7.0, in
which case build-depending on xlibmesa-gl would be the correct interim
solution. If you don't agree with that, you should take it up with
upstream.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Libre software enthusiast | http://
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #6 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:27:21 -0600
From: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <email address hidden>
To: Andreas Jochens <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#326466: mesa: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'xutils, xlibmesa-gl-dev'
Hi,
just a note before someone gets trigger happy about this bug and does
something idiotic.
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 03:05:42PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> When building 'mesa' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
> I get the following error:
>
> touch depend
> makedepend -fdepend -I. -I../../../include -I../..
> /bin/sh: makedepend: command not found
> make[2]: *** [depend] Error 127
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/mesa-
Ah, yes. That's right, thanks.
> In file included from glcontextmodes.
> ../../.
> to 'int' in declaration of '__GLXvisualConfig'
Uhm... glxint.h is missing upstream.
> Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'xutils, xlibmesa-gl-dev'
> to debian/control.
Just in case someone happens to develop an urge to fix this bug before
I upload a fixed package, PLEASE DON'T ADD A DEPENDENCY ON
xlibmesa-gl-dev. That's dumb, to put it mildly. Check out the svn
repo. (if you are messing with the mesa source package you should know
where the repo is)
--
Marcelo
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #7 |
Message-Id: <1126975211.
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 12:40:11 -0400
From: Michel =?ISO-8859-
To: <email address hidden>,
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <email address hidden>
Cc: Andreas Jochens <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#326466: mesa: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'xutils,
xlibmesa-gl-dev'
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 10:27 -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
>=20
> > In file included from glcontextmodes.
> > ../../.
e defaults
> > to 'int' in declaration of '__GLXvisualConfig'
>=20
> Uhm... glxint.h is missing upstream.
>=20
> > Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'xutils, xlibmesa-gl-dev'
> > to debian/control.
>=20
> Just in case someone happens to develop an urge to fix this bug before
> I upload a fixed package, PLEASE DON'T ADD A DEPENDENCY ON
> xlibmesa-gl-dev. That's dumb, to put it mildly. Check out the svn
> repo. (if you are messing with the mesa source package you should know
> where the repo is)
The current upstream plan seems to be to put glxint.h (along with a
bunch of other GL headers) into the proto/GL module as of X.Org 7.0, in
which case build-depending on xlibmesa-gl would be the correct interim
solution. If you don't agree with that, you should take it up with
upstream.
--=20
Earthling Michel D=C3=A4nzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI develop=
er
Libre software enthusiast | http://
In Debian Bug tracker #326466, Sven Luther (sven-luther) wrote : Well, it has been over a month now, what is the plan ? | #8 |
Hello Marcello, ...
Well, it is now over a month since you last commented on this bug, and altough
i understand you don't want people to go trigger happy and do some botched
upload, it would be nice to get something to happen, or some kind of plan.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
In Debian Bug tracker #326466, Sven Luther (sven-luther) wrote : built fine with added xutils and xlibmesa-gl-dev dependencies. | #9 |
Hi, ...
Well, as the subject says, i was able to build it with xutils and
xlibmesa-gl-dev installed, and the resulting accelerated r300 drivers work
just fine.
So, will you make an upload nextly with this fixed, or maybe copying the
glxint.h file over and include it in the package ?
I propose, if i don't hear from you during the next week or so, to make an NMU
upload to fix these issues which have been open since over a month.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #10 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:36:31 +0200
From: Sven Luther <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Well, it has been over a month now, what is the plan ?
Hello Marcello, ...
Well, it is now over a month since you last commented on this bug, and altough
i understand you don't want people to go trigger happy and do some botched
upload, it would be nice to get something to happen, or some kind of plan.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #11 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:22:59 +0200
From: Sven Luther <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: built fine with added xutils and xlibmesa-gl-dev dependencies.
Hi, ...
Well, as the subject says, i was able to build it with xutils and
xlibmesa-gl-dev installed, and the resulting accelerated r300 drivers work
just fine.
So, will you make an upload nextly with this fixed, or maybe copying the
glxint.h file over and include it in the package ?
I propose, if i don't hear from you during the next week or so, to make an NMU
upload to fix these issues which have been open since over a month.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
In Debian Bug tracker #326466, Frank Lichtenheld (djpig) wrote : Re: Bug#326466: Well, it has been over a month now, what is the plan ? | #12 |
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 02:36:31PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Well, it is now over a month since you last commented on this bug, and altough
> i understand you don't want people to go trigger happy and do some botched
> upload, it would be nice to get something to happen, or some kind of plan.
As the week has now passed, do you have time to do the NMU, Sven?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>
www: http://
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #13 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 01:15:47 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>
To: Sven Luther <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#326466: Well, it has been over a month now, what is the plan ?
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 02:36:31PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Well, it is now over a month since you last commented on this bug, and altough
> i understand you don't want people to go trigger happy and do some botched
> upload, it would be nice to get something to happen, or some kind of plan.
As the week has now passed, do you have time to do the NMU, Sven?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>
www: http://
In Debian Bug tracker #326466, Sven Luther (sven-luther) wrote : | #14 |
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 01:15:47AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 02:36:31PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Well, it is now over a month since you last commented on this bug, and altough
> > i understand you don't want people to go trigger happy and do some botched
> > upload, it would be nice to get something to happen, or some kind of plan.
>
> As the week has now passed, do you have time to do the NMU, Sven?
I think Daniel Stone or Michel Daenzer are better candidates for this, and
someone else was working on mesa 6.4. Will investigate, and make an upload
during the week if it is not solved still.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #15 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:54:28 +0100
From: Sven Luther <email address hidden>
To: Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>
Cc: Sven Luther <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#326466: Well, it has been over a month now, what is the plan ?
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 01:15:47AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 02:36:31PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Well, it is now over a month since you last commented on this bug, and altough
> > i understand you don't want people to go trigger happy and do some botched
> > upload, it would be nice to get something to happen, or some kind of plan.
>
> As the week has now passed, do you have time to do the NMU, Sven?
I think Daniel Stone or Michel Daenzer are better candidates for this, and
someone else was working on mesa 6.4. Will investigate, and make an upload
during the week if it is not solved still.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
In Debian Bug tracker #326466, Kurt Roeckx (kurt-roeckx) wrote : | #16 |
Hi,
It seems there isn't any progress on this at all for a long time.
Could someone please shed some light on what is going on with
this?
Kurt
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #17 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:36:13 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <email address hidden>
To: Sven Luther <email address hidden>
Cc: Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>,
Michel =?iso-8859-
Subject: Re: mesa: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'xutils, xlibmesa-gl-dev'
Hi,
It seems there isn't any progress on this at all for a long time.
Could someone please shed some light on what is going on with
this?
Kurt
In Debian Bug tracker #326466, Nathanael Nerode (neroden-twcny) wrote : Is mesa actually maintained? | #18 |
Hello! This is one of 5 RC bugs, apparently with no maintainer response.
Apparently the list which is listed as the maintainer is rejecting messages
(336752), which probably contributes to the problem. Hence the Cc: to
debian-devel.
This bug is trivial to fix, and because it prevents mesa from building, it's
preventing tulip from being built at all. 341479 prevents tulip from being
built too.
I only noticed this because I'm trying to get the C++ allocator transition
finished, which tulip is involved in.
So, um, any chance of any progress?
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #19 |
Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 09:26:33 -0500
From: Nathanael Nerode <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Is mesa actually maintained?
Hello! This is one of 5 RC bugs, apparently with no maintainer response.
Apparently the list which is listed as the maintainer is rejecting messages
(336752), which probably contributes to the problem. Hence the Cc: to
debian-devel.
This bug is trivial to fix, and because it prevents mesa from building, it's
preventing tulip from being built at all. 341479 prevents tulip from being
built too.
I only noticed this because I'm trying to get the C++ allocator transition
finished, which tulip is involved in.
So, um, any chance of any progress?
In Debian Bug tracker #326466, Christoph Berg (cb) wrote : | #20 |
Hi,
here's the diff for the NMU I'm just uploading:
debdiff mesa_6.3.2-2.dsc /srv/pbuilder/
control | 4 ++--
changelog | 10 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -u mesa-6.
--- mesa-6.
+++ mesa-6.
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
Maintainer: Mesa package maintainers <email address hidden>
Uploaders: Marcelo E. Magallon <email address hidden>
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
-Build-Depends: lesstif2-dev, xlibs-dev, grep-dctrl, debhelper (>> 4), build-essential (>= 11), libdrm-dev, libdirectfb-dev
+Build-Depends: lesstif2-dev, grep-dctrl, debhelper (>> 4), build-essential (>= 11), libdrm-dev, libdirectfb-dev, libx11-dev, libxext-dev, libxt-dev, libxxf86vm-dev, x-dev, xutils, xlibmesa-gl-dev
Package: mesag3
Section: libs
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Package: mesag-dev
Section: libdevel
Architecture: any
-Depends: mesag3 (= ${Source-Version}), libc6-dev, libx11-6-dev | xlibs-dev (>> 4.1.0), libxext6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), mesa-common-dev (= ${Source-Version}), lesstif2-dev
+Depends: mesag3 (= ${Source-Version}), libc6-dev, libx11-dev, libxext6, mesa-common-dev (= ${Source-Version}), lesstif2-dev
Provides: libgl-dev, mesag3-widgets, mesag-widgets-dev, libglw-dev
Conflicts: mesa-dev, libgl-dev, mesag3 (<< 3.1-1), nvidia-glx-dev
Replaces: libgl-dev
diff -u mesa-6.
--- mesa-6.
+++ mesa-6.
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+mesa (6.3.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Adjust Build-Depends:
+ + xlibs transition (Closes: #347129).
+ + xutils, xlibmesa-gl-dev (Closes: #326466).
+ * mesag-dev: Depends: libx11-dev (Closes: #347205).
+
+ -- Christoph Berg <email address hidden> Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:45:43 +0100
+
mesa (6.3.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/rules: build only whatever needs to be build according to
Christoph
--
<email address hidden> | http://
In Debian Bug tracker #326466, Christoph Berg (myon) wrote : Fixed in NMU of mesa 6.3.2-2.1 | #21 |
tag 326466 + fixed
tag 347129 + fixed
tag 347205 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:45:43 +0100
Source: mesa
Binary: libgl1-mesa-dri-dev libgl1-mesa-dbg libosmesa6-dev libosmesa6 mesag3 libglu1-mesa-dev mesa-common-dev libglu1-mesa mesag-dev libgl1-mesa-dri libgl1-
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 6.3.2-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mesa package maintainers <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Christoph Berg <email address hidden>
Description:
libgl1-mesa-dbg - A free implementation of the OpenGL API -- debugging package
libgl1-
libgl1-
libgl1-mesa-dri - A free implementation of the OpenGL API -- DRI runtime
libgl1-
libglu1-mesa - The OpenGL utility library (GLU)
libglu1-mesa-dev - The OpenGL utility library -- development support files
libosmesa6 - Mesa Off-screen rendering extension
libosmesa6-dev - Mesa Off-screen rendering extension -- development support files
mesa-common-dev - Developer documentation for Mesa
mesag-dev - A free implementation of the OpenGL API -- development support fi
mesag3 - A free implementation of the OpenGL API -- runtime
Closes: 326466 347129 347205
Changes:
mesa (6.3.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Adjust Build-Depends:
+ xlibs transition (Closes: #347129).
+ xutils, xlibmesa-gl-dev (Closes: #326466).
* mesag-dev: Depends: libx11-dev (Closes: #347205).
Files:
40a8e9c4e33b91
9193703e7caf77
c299d43171e9a7
1becb4eaf4bd0a
bf865fd823ddbc
a29845f12133b0
883b00986c669d
cee71c9ce63c63
0c4c70e5d6ff2e
0f3c4052e47266
6a59042f690299
40fb242c7953a3
5cbdfec22e47fe
09e074781e2bdf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFD0Udhxa9
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
In Debian Bug tracker #326466, David Nusinow (dnusinow) wrote : Fixed in NMU of mesa 6.4.1-0.1 | #22 |
tag 232665 + fixed
tag 326466 + fixed
tag 334742 + fixed
tag 336565 + fixed
tag 340168 + fixed
tag 341479 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:43:37 -0500
Source: mesa
Binary: libgl1-
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 6.4.1-0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Nusinow <email address hidden>
Changed-By: David Nusinow <email address hidden>
Description:
libgl1-mesa-dev - A free implementation of the OpenGL API -- GLX development suppor
libgl1-
libgl1-
libgl1-mesa-dri - A free implementation of the OpenGL API -- DRI modules
libgl1-mesa-glx - A free implementation of the OpenGL API -- GLX runtime
libgl1-mesa-swx11 - A free implementation of the OpenGL API -- runtime
libgl1-
libgl1-
libglu1-mesa - The OpenGL utility library (GLU)
libglu1-mesa-dev - The OpenGL utility library -- development support files
libosmesa6 - Mesa Off-screen rendering extension
libosmesa6-dev - Mesa Off-screen rendering extension -- development support files
mesa-common-dev - Developer documentation for Mesa
mesa-swx11-source - Mesa software rasteriser source -- development support files
Closes: 232665 326466 334742 336565 340168 341479
Changes:
mesa (6.4.1-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Marcelo E. Magallon <email address hidden> ]
* debian/control: build-depend on xutils
* include/
* debian/
* debian/rules: GLU and GLW don't have arch-specific targets.
.
[ Daniel Stone <email address hidden> ]
* New upstream version, incorporating changes from Ubuntu 6.3 packaging.
* Rename packages:
- mesag3 -> libgl1-mesa-swrast
- mesag-dev -> libgl1-
- libgl1-mesa-dri -> libgl1-mesa
- libgl1-mesa-dri-dev -> libgl1-mesa-dev
- libgl1-mesa-dri still exists, but now contains the DRI modules only.
* Drop dependency *from* mesa-common-dev on libgl1-mesa-dev and
libglu1-
* Add Build-Depends on pkg-config to get flags from libdrm, and libexpat-dev
for DRI configuration. Break out xlibs-dev Build-Depends to the
individual libraries required.
* Bump libdrm-dev Build-Depends to >> 1.0.5, in order to get new
via_drm.h to build the unichrome DRI driver.
* Configs: pare DRI drivers down to a sensible set for each architecture.
* Remove completely broken Gl...
In Debian Bug tracker #326466, Adam D. Barratt (debian-bts-adam-barratt) wrote : Bugs fixed in NMU, documenting versions | #23 |
# Hi,
#
# These bugs were fixed in an NMU, but have not been acknowledged by the
# maintainers. With version tracking in the Debian BTS, it is important
# to know which version of a package fixes each bug so that they can be
# tracked for release status, so I'm closing these bugs with the
#relevant version information now
close 271427 8.14+v8.11+urw-0.1
close 314698 0.35-2.1
close 325635 0.35-2.1
close 328017 0.35-2.1
close 320115 2.0-4.2
close 320284 1.11
close 320899 11.4.1870-7.1
close 327078 11.4.1870-7.1
close 327349 11.4.1870-7.1
close 320903 1:0.71-1.2
close 327946 1:0.71-1.2
close 320941 2.0.3-1.1
close 321126 2.6.3.2
close 321545 0.1.3b-1.1
close 341341 0.1.3b-1.1
close 321553 0.1.12-2.2
close 321644 2:1.7.12-1.1
close 346013 2:1.7.12-1.1
close 321816 2.61-2.1
close 321967 4.0.0-2.1
close 330024 4.0.0-2.1
close 321998 0.9.21-0.1
close 322583 0.3.8.1-4
close 322853 0.7.1-3.1
close 356739 0.7.1-3.1
close 322961 0.4.3.1.dfsg-0.1
close 322972 9.4.2-2.4
close 323084 0.4.5+cvs200308
close 323160 0.1.10-0.1
close 323355 1.2.11-0.2
close 323725 0.18.2-10.1
close 323942 0.4.0-4.1
close 324371 4.3-18.1
close 324553 2.9.5.0.37.5.2
close 324558 1.2-release-2.1
close 324579 1.11-6.2
close 324606 1.2-release-2.2
close 324908 0.12.4-4.1
close 325210 2.6.0-1.1
close 325490 0.7.1-1.1
close 325514 0.8.6-1.1
close 326468 0.8.6-1.1
close 325532 2:1.7.12-1
close 327366 2:1.7.12-1
close 329778 2:1.7.12-1
close 332480 2:1.7.12-1
close 325635 0.35-2.1
close 328017 0.35-2.1
close 325835 0.1.12-7.1
close 325851 2:1.7.8-1sarge2
close 325938 0.9.8beta2-4.1
close 327930 0.9.8beta2-4.1
close 326285 0.99.3-5.1
close 326295 0.8.2-5.1
close 373110 0.8.2-5.1
close 379331 0.8.2-5.1
close 379334 0.8.2-5.1
close 326298 0.2.12-2.1
close 326311 0.3.5-1pre1.1
close 326355 2.1.8-2.1
close 326362 0.6-7.2
close 326371 0.90beta1-10.1
close 326372 1.0-0.1
close 326378 0.1.17-4.3
close 326466 6.3.2-2.1
close 347129 6.3.2-2.1
close 347205 6.3.2-2.1
close 326489 0.3.7-2.1
close 326756 1.0.9-1.1
close 365518 1.0.9-1.1
close 327429 1.2-1.1
close 350429 1.2-1.1
close 327911 2.3.5-1.1
close 327718 0.6.0-8.2
close 327933 0.9.2-1.1
close 327936 0.8.5-1.1
close 327970 0.5.1-2.1
close 327984 1.3-2.1
close 327986 0.2.36-4.1
close 291328 0.2.36-4.1
close 327996 1.0-1.1
close 328002 1.0.0-9.1
close 328018 2.1.3-2.1
close 328039 1.18A-2.1
close 328172 1.002-0.2
close 328333 4.1.2-1.1
close 328334 1.34-7.1
close 328335 0.8.2-2.1
close 328352 0.13-3.1
close 328364 0.4.0-test5-2.1
close 329467 1.3.1
close 330446 0.1.83
close 333857 0.1.83
close 330666 6:6.2.4.5-0.2
close 330938 0.5.1-2.2
Changed in mesa: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
Automatically imported from Debian bug report #326466 http:// bugs.debian. org/326466