Comment 23 for bug 1234612

(In reply to David McInnis from comment #12)
Hi,

thanks for the patch, I will apply it with one minor change. I have already used:
- for(i = 0; i < sizeof(possible_nhm_bus); i++) {
+ for(i = 0; i < sizeof(possible_nhm_bus) / sizeof(possible_nhm_bus[0]); i++) {

I will keep it, because it is more generic solution than the hardcoded number of iterations.

Could you provide more information about the -fno-inline-functions-called-once. What it fixes and why?