Needs to install mkspecs in correct directory with Qt 5.2.1
Bug #1279235 reported by
Timo Jyrinki
This bug affects 2 people
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
maliit-framework (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Critical
|
Łukasz Zemczak |
Bug Description
With Qt 5.2.1, inherited from Debian, mkspecs directory was changed. maliit-framework does not work with this, since instead of QT_INSTALL_DATA, QT_INSTALL_ARCHDATA should be used. I've manually patched maliit-framework in the https:/
Related branches
lp:~sil2100/maliit/maliit-framework-ubuntu_5.2_mkspecs
Approved
for merging
into
lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/maliit/maliit-framework-ubuntu
- Martin Pitt: Approve
- Timo Jyrinki: Approve
-
Diff: 81 lines (+38/-4)5 files modifieddebian/changelog (+7/-0)
debian/control (+1/-1)
debian/maliit-framework-dev.install (+3/-3)
debian/patches/0007-use_host_prefix_for_mkspecs.patch (+26/-0)
debian/patches/series (+1/-0)
tags: | added: patch |
Changed in maliit-framework (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | nobody → Bill Filler (bfiller) |
assignee: | Bill Filler (bfiller) → nobody |
status: | New → Confirmed |
Changed in maliit-framework (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | nobody → Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) |
Changed in maliit-framework (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Confirmed → In Progress |
To post a comment you must log in.
I had a chat with Timo and we decided to simply hard-depend on Qt 5.2 to fix this. I modified Timo's patch to make it backwards compatible with Qt 5.0.2, but doing such a 'backward compatibility' in packaging is a bit harder, we would actually have to do some nasty hacks in debian/rules (dh_install doesn't support anything helpful). Branch attached.