| 2023-10-19 17:04:16 |
Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2023-10-19 17:05:31 |
Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Thomas Parrott |
| 2023-10-19 19:25:40 |
Simon Déziel |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Simon Déziel |
| 2023-10-20 13:25:48 |
Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Serge Hallyn |
| 2023-10-20 17:27:17 |
Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn |
attachment added |
|
set LXC_DEVEL to 0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/2039873/+attachment/5711815/+files/debdiff.diff |
|
| 2023-10-20 17:54:08 |
Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn |
attachment removed |
set LXC_DEVEL to 0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/2039873/+attachment/5711815/+files/debdiff.diff |
|
|
| 2023-10-20 17:54:28 |
Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn |
attachment added |
|
set LXC_DEVEL to 0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/2039873/+attachment/5711843/+files/debdiff.diff |
|
| 2023-10-20 17:58:00 |
Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Stéphane Graber |
| 2023-10-21 16:16:30 |
Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot |
tags |
|
patch |
|
| 2023-10-21 16:16:33 |
Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Ubuntu Sponsors |
| 2023-10-22 15:46:12 |
Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn |
description |
Dear colleagues,
As I can see from:
- https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/tree/configure?h=applied/ubuntu/jammy
- https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/tree/configure?h=applied/ubuntu/kinetic
LXC 5.0.0 was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 set. But for release build we should have LXC_DEVEL=0.
LXC_DEVEL is a variable that appears in the /usr/include/lxc/version.h and then can be (and actually it is) used by other projects to detect if liblxc-dev is a development build or stable.
Having LXC_DEVEL=1 makes problems for the users who want to build projects those are depend on liblxc
from source (for example, LXD, go-lxc: https://github.com/canonical/lxd/pull/12420).
Q: Why it was not a problem for so long?
A: Because LXC API was stable for a long time, but recently we have extended liblxc API (https://github.com/lxc/lxc/pull/4260) and dependant package go-lxc was updated too (https://github.com/lxc/go-lxc/pull/166).
This change was developed properly to be backward compatible with the old versions of liblxc. But, there is a problem. If LXC_DEVEL=1 then the macro check VERSION_AT_LEAST (https://github.com/lxc/go-lxc/blob/ccae595aa49e779f7ecc9250329967aa546acd31/lxc-binding.h#L7) is disabled. That's why we should *not* have LXC_DEVEL=1 for *any* release build of LXC.
And also, as I can see the source code that was used to build LXC 5.0.0 in Jammy/Kinetic is not precisely the same as in the official LXC 5.0.0 tag (https://github.com/lxc/lxc/tree/lxc-5.0.0).
I understand that Jammy is a LTS release and making any changes is a problem and we should go through the SRU process. But I believe that we have to do something at least with LXC_DEVEL to make things work properly.
Kind regards,
Alex |
[ Impact ]
LXC 5.0.0 was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 set. But for release build we should have LXC_DEVEL=0.
LXC_DEVEL is a variable that appears in the /usr/include/lxc/version.h and then can be (and actually it is) used by other projects to detect if liblxc-dev is a development build or stable.
Having LXC_DEVEL=1 makes problems for the users who want to build projects those are depend on liblxc
from source (for example, LXD, go-lxc: https://github.com/canonical/lxd/pull/12420).
Q: Why it was not a problem for so long?
A: Because LXC API was stable for a long time, but recently we have extended liblxc API (https://github.com/lxc/lxc/pull/4260) and dependant package go-lxc was updated too (https://github.com/lxc/go-lxc/pull/166).
This change was developed properly to be backward compatible with the old versions of liblxc. But, there is a problem. If LXC_DEVEL=1 then the macro check VERSION_AT_LEAST (https://github.com/lxc/go-lxc/blob/ccae595aa49e779f7ecc9250329967aa546acd31/lxc-binding.h#L7) is disabled. That's why we should *not* have LXC_DEVEL=1 for *any* release build of LXC.
[ Test Plan ]
Install liblxc-dev package and check /usr/include/lxc/version.h file
LXC_DEVEL should be 0
[ Where problems could occur ]
Theoretically, build of a software which depends on liblxc-dev may start to fail
if it assumes that LXC_DEVEL is 1.
[ Other Info ]
- |
|
| 2023-10-22 15:46:43 |
Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn |
description |
[ Impact ]
LXC 5.0.0 was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 set. But for release build we should have LXC_DEVEL=0.
LXC_DEVEL is a variable that appears in the /usr/include/lxc/version.h and then can be (and actually it is) used by other projects to detect if liblxc-dev is a development build or stable.
Having LXC_DEVEL=1 makes problems for the users who want to build projects those are depend on liblxc
from source (for example, LXD, go-lxc: https://github.com/canonical/lxd/pull/12420).
Q: Why it was not a problem for so long?
A: Because LXC API was stable for a long time, but recently we have extended liblxc API (https://github.com/lxc/lxc/pull/4260) and dependant package go-lxc was updated too (https://github.com/lxc/go-lxc/pull/166).
This change was developed properly to be backward compatible with the old versions of liblxc. But, there is a problem. If LXC_DEVEL=1 then the macro check VERSION_AT_LEAST (https://github.com/lxc/go-lxc/blob/ccae595aa49e779f7ecc9250329967aa546acd31/lxc-binding.h#L7) is disabled. That's why we should *not* have LXC_DEVEL=1 for *any* release build of LXC.
[ Test Plan ]
Install liblxc-dev package and check /usr/include/lxc/version.h file
LXC_DEVEL should be 0
[ Where problems could occur ]
Theoretically, build of a software which depends on liblxc-dev may start to fail
if it assumes that LXC_DEVEL is 1.
[ Other Info ]
- |
[ Impact ]
LXC 5.0.0 was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 set for Jammy. But for release build we should have LXC_DEVEL=0.
LXC_DEVEL is a variable that appears in the /usr/include/lxc/version.h and then can be (and actually it is) used by other projects to detect if liblxc-dev is a development build or stable.
Having LXC_DEVEL=1 makes problems for the users who want to build projects those are depend on liblxc
from source (for example, LXD, go-lxc: https://github.com/canonical/lxd/pull/12420).
Q: Why it was not a problem for so long?
A: Because LXC API was stable for a long time, but recently we have extended liblxc API (https://github.com/lxc/lxc/pull/4260) and dependant package go-lxc was updated too (https://github.com/lxc/go-lxc/pull/166).
This change was developed properly to be backward compatible with the old versions of liblxc. But, there is a problem. If LXC_DEVEL=1 then the macro check VERSION_AT_LEAST (https://github.com/lxc/go-lxc/blob/ccae595aa49e779f7ecc9250329967aa546acd31/lxc-binding.h#L7) is disabled. That's why we should *not* have LXC_DEVEL=1 for *any* release build of LXC.
[ Test Plan ]
Install liblxc-dev package and check /usr/include/lxc/version.h file
LXC_DEVEL should be 0
[ Where problems could occur ]
Theoretically, build of a software which depends on liblxc-dev may start to fail
if it assumes that LXC_DEVEL is 1.
[ Other Info ]
- |
|
| 2023-10-23 07:51:33 |
Launchpad Janitor |
lxc (Ubuntu): status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
| 2023-10-23 15:42:21 |
Robie Basak |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Robie Basak |
| 2023-10-31 20:59:54 |
Bryce Harrington |
removed subscriber Ubuntu Sponsors |
|
|
|
| 2023-11-23 14:01:27 |
Simon Déziel |
summary |
liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu Jammy/Kinetic |
liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu 22.04 and later releases |
|
| 2023-11-25 11:07:00 |
Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn |
attachment added |
|
debdiff for noble https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/2039873/+attachment/5723397/+files/noble_5.0.1_to_5.0.3_debdiff.diff |
|
| 2023-12-07 08:46:34 |
Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Ubuntu Sponsors |
| 2023-12-13 17:15:09 |
Athos Ribeiro |
removed subscriber Ubuntu Sponsors |
|
|
|
| 2023-12-14 15:41:36 |
Thomas Hipp |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Thomas Hipp |
| 2023-12-14 15:41:41 |
Thomas Hipp |
removed subscriber Thomas Hipp |
|
|
|
| 2024-01-04 15:39:30 |
Robie Basak |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Ubuntu Sponsors |
| 2024-01-18 16:06:40 |
Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn |
attachment added |
|
debdiff for mantic/noble (they have the same version 1:5.0.1-0ubuntu7) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/2039873/+attachment/5740489/+files/debdiff_for_mantic_and_noble.diff |
|
| 2024-01-18 16:34:43 |
Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn |
attachment added |
|
debdiff for jammy https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/2039873/+attachment/5740492/+files/debdiff_for_jammy.diff |
|
| 2024-01-18 16:35:30 |
Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn |
attachment added |
|
debdiff for mantic/noble (they have the same version 1:5.0.1-0ubuntu7) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/2039873/+attachment/5740493/+files/debdiff_for_mantic_and_noble.diff |
|
| 2024-01-18 16:35:40 |
Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn |
attachment removed |
debdiff for mantic/noble (they have the same version 1:5.0.1-0ubuntu7) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/2039873/+attachment/5740489/+files/debdiff_for_mantic_and_noble.diff |
|
|
| 2024-01-19 19:11:27 |
Andreas Hasenack |
nominated for series |
|
Ubuntu Noble |
|
| 2024-01-19 19:11:27 |
Andreas Hasenack |
bug task added |
|
lxc (Ubuntu Noble) |
|
| 2024-01-19 19:11:27 |
Andreas Hasenack |
nominated for series |
|
Ubuntu Jammy |
|
| 2024-01-19 19:11:27 |
Andreas Hasenack |
bug task added |
|
lxc (Ubuntu Jammy) |
|
| 2024-01-19 19:11:27 |
Andreas Hasenack |
nominated for series |
|
Ubuntu Mantic |
|
| 2024-01-19 19:11:27 |
Andreas Hasenack |
bug task added |
|
lxc (Ubuntu Mantic) |
|
| 2024-01-19 19:46:21 |
Andreas Hasenack |
lxc (Ubuntu Mantic): status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
| 2024-01-19 19:47:45 |
Andreas Hasenack |
lxc (Ubuntu Jammy): status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
| 2024-01-19 20:12:03 |
Andreas Hasenack |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Andreas Hasenack |
| 2024-01-24 16:28:53 |
Dave Jones |
lxc (Ubuntu Noble): status |
Confirmed |
Fix Committed |
|
| 2024-01-24 21:42:56 |
Ubuntu Archive Robot |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Dave Jones |
| 2024-01-24 22:14:53 |
Dave Jones |
summary |
liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu 22.04 and later releases |
[SRU] liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu 22.04 and later releases |
|
| 2024-01-24 22:15:07 |
Dave Jones |
removed subscriber Ubuntu Sponsors |
|
|
|
| 2024-01-25 01:40:35 |
Launchpad Janitor |
lxc (Ubuntu Noble): status |
Fix Committed |
Fix Released |
|
| 2024-02-02 07:47:08 |
Timo Aaltonen |
lxc (Ubuntu Mantic): status |
Confirmed |
Fix Committed |
|
| 2024-02-02 07:47:10 |
Timo Aaltonen |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team |
| 2024-02-02 07:47:11 |
Timo Aaltonen |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber SRU Verification |
| 2024-02-02 07:47:15 |
Timo Aaltonen |
tags |
patch |
patch verification-needed verification-needed-mantic |
|
| 2024-02-02 10:20:00 |
Timo Aaltonen |
lxc (Ubuntu Jammy): status |
Confirmed |
Fix Committed |
|
| 2024-02-02 10:20:06 |
Timo Aaltonen |
tags |
patch verification-needed verification-needed-mantic |
patch verification-needed verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-mantic |
|
| 2024-02-02 14:03:43 |
Simon Déziel |
tags |
patch verification-needed verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-mantic |
patch verification-done-jammy verification-needed verification-needed-mantic |
|
| 2024-02-02 14:58:54 |
Simon Déziel |
tags |
patch verification-done-jammy verification-needed verification-needed-mantic |
patch verification-done verification-done-jammy verification-done-mantic |
|
| 2024-02-12 10:37:13 |
Launchpad Janitor |
lxc (Ubuntu Mantic): status |
Fix Committed |
Fix Released |
|
| 2024-02-12 10:37:16 |
Łukasz Zemczak |
removed subscriber Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team |
|
|
|
| 2024-02-12 10:46:41 |
Launchpad Janitor |
lxc (Ubuntu Jammy): status |
Fix Committed |
Fix Released |
|
