Ubuntu
lxc package

  1. Bug #1043018
  2. Comment #13

Comment 13 for bug 1043018

Revision history for this message
Dan Kegel (dank) wrote :

I find the old behavior confusing, and http://www.greenhills.co.uk/2011/06/10/lxc.html seems to agree, it says
"I’m going to skip lxc-ls because it’s needlessly confusing."