| 2023-04-12 08:43:40 |
roland aus köln |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2023-04-12 08:48:09 |
roland aus köln |
attachment added |
|
screenshot of cpu usage in proxmox https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-default-settings/+bug/2015979/+attachment/5663205/+files/screensaver.png |
|
| 2023-04-12 08:48:51 |
roland aus köln |
description |
i have installed lubuntu in a VM and default screensaver causing more then 60% of cpu load on a dual vcpu VM.
from an environmental perspective, this is a total nogo in 2023, as it's wasting precious energy/ressources and alsowasting peoples money. furthermore, it will unnecessarily put stress on your hardware, which could be avoided.
please make screensaver defaults more cpu/energy friendly
http://codesqueeze.com/save-energy-kill-your-screensaver/ |
i have installed lubuntu in a VM and default screensaver causing 70% of cpu load on a dual vcpu VM.
from an environmental perspective, this is a total nogo in 2023, as it's wasting precious energy/ressources and alsowasting peoples money. furthermore, it will unnecessarily put stress on your hardware, which could be avoided.
please make screensaver defaults more cpu/energy friendly
http://codesqueeze.com/save-energy-kill-your-screensaver/ |
|
| 2023-04-12 08:55:08 |
roland aus köln |
description |
i have installed lubuntu in a VM and default screensaver causing 70% of cpu load on a dual vcpu VM.
from an environmental perspective, this is a total nogo in 2023, as it's wasting precious energy/ressources and alsowasting peoples money. furthermore, it will unnecessarily put stress on your hardware, which could be avoided.
please make screensaver defaults more cpu/energy friendly
http://codesqueeze.com/save-energy-kill-your-screensaver/ |
i have installed lubuntu in a VM and default screensaver causing 70% of cpu load on a dual vcpu VM.
from an environmental perspective, this is a total nogo in 2023, as it's wasting precious energy/ressources and also wasting peoples money ( we have prices more then 50ct/kwh here in germany).
furthermore, it will unnecessarily put stress on your hardware, which could be avoided.
please make screensaver defaults more cpu/energy friendly
http://codesqueeze.com/save-energy-kill-your-screensaver/ |
|
| 2023-04-13 09:38:39 |
roland aus köln |
description |
i have installed lubuntu in a VM and default screensaver causing 70% of cpu load on a dual vcpu VM.
from an environmental perspective, this is a total nogo in 2023, as it's wasting precious energy/ressources and also wasting peoples money ( we have prices more then 50ct/kwh here in germany).
furthermore, it will unnecessarily put stress on your hardware, which could be avoided.
please make screensaver defaults more cpu/energy friendly
http://codesqueeze.com/save-energy-kill-your-screensaver/ |
i have installed lubuntu in a VM and default screensaver causing 70% of cpu load on a dual vcpu VM.
from an environmental perspective, this is a total nogo in 2023, as it's wasting precious energy/ressources and also wasting peoples money ( we have prices more then 50ct/kwh here in germany).
furthermore, it will unnecessarily put stress on your hardware, which could be avoided.
please make screensaver defaults more cpu/energy friendly
http://codesqueeze.com/save-energy-kill-your-screensaver/
for example, on my macmini, with lubuntu VM idle in the background, power is <10W and with the screensaver active it's at 20W.
that's additional 10W - or 7,2kWh in a month - for a screen where nothing
is to be "saved" and where you typically don't often look at. |
|
| 2023-04-13 09:40:00 |
roland aus köln |
description |
i have installed lubuntu in a VM and default screensaver causing 70% of cpu load on a dual vcpu VM.
from an environmental perspective, this is a total nogo in 2023, as it's wasting precious energy/ressources and also wasting peoples money ( we have prices more then 50ct/kwh here in germany).
furthermore, it will unnecessarily put stress on your hardware, which could be avoided.
please make screensaver defaults more cpu/energy friendly
http://codesqueeze.com/save-energy-kill-your-screensaver/
for example, on my macmini, with lubuntu VM idle in the background, power is <10W and with the screensaver active it's at 20W.
that's additional 10W - or 7,2kWh in a month - for a screen where nothing
is to be "saved" and where you typically don't often look at. |
i have installed lubuntu in a VM and default screensaver causing 70% of cpu load on a dual vcpu VM.
from an environmental perspective, this is a total nogo in 2023, as it's wasting precious energy/ressources and also wasting peoples money ( we have prices more then 50ct/kwh here in germany).
furthermore, it will unnecessarily put stress on your hardware, which could be avoided.
please make screensaver defaults more cpu/energy friendly
http://codesqueeze.com/save-energy-kill-your-screensaver/
for example, on my macmini, with lubuntu VM idle in the background,
idle power consumtion is <10W and with the screensaver going active
it's increasing to 20W.
that's additional 10W - or 7,2kWh in a month - for a screen where nothing
is to be "saved" and where you typically don't often look at. |
|
| 2023-04-13 09:40:35 |
roland aus köln |
description |
i have installed lubuntu in a VM and default screensaver causing 70% of cpu load on a dual vcpu VM.
from an environmental perspective, this is a total nogo in 2023, as it's wasting precious energy/ressources and also wasting peoples money ( we have prices more then 50ct/kwh here in germany).
furthermore, it will unnecessarily put stress on your hardware, which could be avoided.
please make screensaver defaults more cpu/energy friendly
http://codesqueeze.com/save-energy-kill-your-screensaver/
for example, on my macmini, with lubuntu VM idle in the background,
idle power consumtion is <10W and with the screensaver going active
it's increasing to 20W.
that's additional 10W - or 7,2kWh in a month - for a screen where nothing
is to be "saved" and where you typically don't often look at. |
i have installed lubuntu in a VM and default screensaver causing 70% of cpu load on a dual vcpu VM.
from an environmental perspective, this is a total nogo in 2023, as it's wasting precious energy/ressources and also wasting peoples money ( we have prices more then 50ct/kwh here in germany).
furthermore, it will unnecessarily put stress on your hardware, which could be avoided.
please make screensaver defaults more cpu/energy friendly
http://codesqueeze.com/save-energy-kill-your-screensaver/
for example, on my macmini, with lubuntu VM idle in the background,
idle power consumtion is <10W and with the screensaver going active
it's increasing to 20W.
that's additional 10W (double in energy usage ) - or 7,2kWh in a month
- for a screen where nothing is to be "saved" and where you typically
don't often look at. |
|
| 2023-04-13 20:45:03 |
Hans P. Möller |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Hans P. Möller |
| 2023-04-13 20:45:20 |
Hans P. Möller |
removed subscriber Hans P. Möller |
|
|
|
| 2023-04-16 14:40:08 |
roland aus köln |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Walter Lapchynski |
| 2023-04-16 14:42:01 |
roland aus köln |
description |
i have installed lubuntu in a VM and default screensaver causing 70% of cpu load on a dual vcpu VM.
from an environmental perspective, this is a total nogo in 2023, as it's wasting precious energy/ressources and also wasting peoples money ( we have prices more then 50ct/kwh here in germany).
furthermore, it will unnecessarily put stress on your hardware, which could be avoided.
please make screensaver defaults more cpu/energy friendly
http://codesqueeze.com/save-energy-kill-your-screensaver/
for example, on my macmini, with lubuntu VM idle in the background,
idle power consumtion is <10W and with the screensaver going active
it's increasing to 20W.
that's additional 10W (double in energy usage ) - or 7,2kWh in a month
- for a screen where nothing is to be "saved" and where you typically
don't often look at. |
i have installed lubuntu in a VM and default screensaver causing 70% of cpu load on a dual vcpu VM.
from an environmental perspective, this is sort of nogo in 2023, as it's wasting precious energy/ressources and also wasting peoples money ( we have prices more then 50ct/kwh here in germany).
furthermore, it will unnecessarily put stress on your hardware, which could be avoided.
please make screensaver defaults more cpu/energy friendly
http://codesqueeze.com/save-energy-kill-your-screensaver/
for example, on my macmini, with lubuntu VM idle in the background,
idle power consumtion is <10W and with the screensaver going active
it's increasing to 20W.
that's additional 10W (double in energy usage ) - or 7,2kWh in a month
- for a screen where nothing is to be "saved" and where you typically
don't often look at. |
|
| 2024-03-27 23:53:03 |
ԜаӀtеr Ⅼарсһуnѕkі |
lubuntu-default-settings (Ubuntu): status |
New |
Incomplete |
|
| 2024-04-01 18:59:33 |
ԜаӀtеr Ⅼарсһуnѕkі |
lubuntu-default-settings (Ubuntu): status |
Incomplete |
Triaged |
|
| 2024-04-01 18:59:37 |
ԜаӀtеr Ⅼарсһуnѕkі |
lubuntu-default-settings (Ubuntu): importance |
Undecided |
Low |
|
| 2024-04-01 18:59:43 |
ԜаӀtеr Ⅼарсһуnѕkі |
lubuntu-default-settings (Ubuntu): assignee |
|
Lubuntu Developers (lubuntu-dev) |
|
| 2024-04-01 18:59:49 |
ԜаӀtеr Ⅼарсһуnѕkі |
lubuntu-default-settings (Ubuntu): milestone |
|
later |
|
