Misleading error message in lock tests

[Karel Pičman]

I think that in the error message of getlock method are swapped got and wanted lock types.

if (scope != reslock.scope) {
        t_context("requested lockscope not satisfied! got %s, wanted %s",
                  scope == ne_lockscope_exclusive ? "exclusive" : "shared",
                  reslock.scope == ne_lockscope_exclusive ?
                  "exclusive" : "shared");
        ne_unlock(i_session, &reslock);
        return FAIL;
    }

I'd patch it as follows:

line 86 -- t_context("requested lockscope not satisfied! got %s, wanted %s",

line 86 ++ t_context("requested lockscope not satisfied! wanted %s, got %s",

[Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot (crichton)]

The attachment "A patch fixing the reported problem." seems to be a patch. If it isn't, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-reviewers, unsubscribe the team.

[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by ~brian-murray, for any issues please contact him.]