| 2025-10-28 10:41:45 |
Lukas Märdian |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2025-10-28 11:02:45 |
Lukas Märdian |
linuxptp (Ubuntu): milestone |
ubuntu-26.01 |
ubuntu-26.02 |
|
| 2025-12-02 16:42:04 |
Lukas Märdian |
linuxptp (Ubuntu): milestone |
ubuntu-26.02 |
ubuntu-25.12 |
|
| 2025-12-11 15:15:01 |
Lukas Märdian |
description |
As per SD-2569 we want to have linuxptp >= 4.4. for 26.04 LTS.
To be merged from Debian or upstream. |
As per SD-2569 we want to have linuxptp >= 4.4. for 26.04 LTS.
To be merged from Debian or upstream.
Important note from Salsa (https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/linuxptp/-/merge_requests/4):
Upstream supports 4 different cryptographic libraries to enable this features:
- GnuPG
- GnuTLS
- Nettle
- OpenSSL
I decided to go with Nettle because it was the least burdensome choice. OpenSSL enforces a license change to GPLv3 on LinuxPTP, GnuTLS depends on nettle-dev so we end up with both the Nettle and GnuTLS backends enabled if we don’t patch the upstream source and I did not considerate GnuPG.
=> going with Nettle should be fine as long as the package stays in universe. |
|
| 2025-12-11 15:15:12 |
Lukas Märdian |
description |
As per SD-2569 we want to have linuxptp >= 4.4. for 26.04 LTS.
To be merged from Debian or upstream.
Important note from Salsa (https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/linuxptp/-/merge_requests/4):
Upstream supports 4 different cryptographic libraries to enable this features:
- GnuPG
- GnuTLS
- Nettle
- OpenSSL
I decided to go with Nettle because it was the least burdensome choice. OpenSSL enforces a license change to GPLv3 on LinuxPTP, GnuTLS depends on nettle-dev so we end up with both the Nettle and GnuTLS backends enabled if we don’t patch the upstream source and I did not considerate GnuPG.
=> going with Nettle should be fine as long as the package stays in universe. |
As per SD-2569 we want to have linuxptp >= 4.4. for 26.04 LTS.
To be merged from Debian or upstream.
Important note from Salsa (https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/linuxptp/-/merge_requests/4):
"""
Upstream supports 4 different cryptographic libraries to enable this features:
- GnuPG
- GnuTLS
- Nettle
- OpenSSL
I decided to go with Nettle because it was the least burdensome choice. OpenSSL enforces a license change to GPLv3 on LinuxPTP, GnuTLS depends on nettle-dev so we end up with both the Nettle and GnuTLS backends enabled if we don’t patch the upstream source and I did not considerate GnuPG.
"""
=> going with Nettle should be fine as long as the package stays in universe. |
|
| 2025-12-11 15:20:01 |
Lukas Märdian |
merge proposal linked |
|
https://code.launchpad.net/~slyon/ubuntu/+source/linuxptp/+git/linuxptp/+merge/497354 |
|
| 2025-12-11 15:21:33 |
Lukas Märdian |
linuxptp (Ubuntu): status |
New |
In Progress |
|
| 2025-12-15 17:05:11 |
Lukas Märdian |
linuxptp (Ubuntu): status |
In Progress |
Fix Committed |
|
| 2025-12-16 13:02:46 |
Launchpad Janitor |
linuxptp (Ubuntu): status |
Fix Committed |
Fix Released |
|
