package linux-image-2.6.38-10-generic (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: podproces nowy skrypt pre-installation zwrócił kod błędu 128
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
linux (Ubuntu) |
Confirmed
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
error during automatic update
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: linux-image-
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.23.
AplayDevices:
**** List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices ****
card 0: I82801AAICH [Intel 82801AA-ICH], device 0: Intel ICH [Intel 82801AA-ICH]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
USER PID ACCESS COMMAND
/dev/snd/
CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] Nie ma takiego pliku ani katalogu
Card0.Amixer.info:
Card hw:0 'I82801AAICH'
Mixer name : 'SigmaTel STAC9700,83,84'
Components : 'AC97a:83847600'
Controls : 34
Simple ctrls : 24
CurrentDmesg: [ 82.087743] EXT4-fs (sda1): re-mounted. Opts: errors=
Date: Sun Jul 24 11:07:56 2011
ErrorMessage: podproces nowy skrypt pre-installation zwrócił kod błędu 128
HibernationDevice: RESUME=
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release amd64 (20110427.1)
IwConfig:
lo no wireless extensions.
eth0 no wireless extensions.
Lsusb:
Bus 001 Device 002: ID 80ee:0021
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
MachineType: innotek GmbH VirtualBox
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=
RelatedPackageV
linux-
linux-
linux-firmware 1.52
RfKill:
SourcePackage: linux
Title: package linux-image-
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 12/01/2006
dmi.bios.vendor: innotek GmbH
dmi.bios.version: VirtualBox
dmi.modalias: dmi:bvninnotekG
dmi.product.name: VirtualBox
dmi.product.
dmi.sys.vendor: innotek GmbH
Changed in linux (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.