| 2010-03-29 03:57:03 |
Roasted |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2010-03-29 04:00:49 |
Roasted |
description |
I have a laptop here (Toshiba Satellite L25) with an Atheros 2413 wireless card.
In each version of Ubuntu I tried, I can see the SSID of my wireless out of box. However, when trying to connect, I get the following:
8.04.4 = Works with WPA.
9.04 = Works with WPA.
9.10 = Works unsecured, not with WPA.
10.04 March 28th Daily Build = Works unsecured, not with WPA.
With 9.10, I also tried "WICD" network manager, and it too didn't yield any differences. |
I have a laptop here (Toshiba Satellite L25) with an Atheros 2413 wireless card.
In each version of Ubuntu I tried, I can see the SSID of my wireless out of box. However, when trying to connect, I get the following:
8.04.4 = Works with WPA.
9.04 = Works with WPA.
9.10 = Works unsecured, not with WPA.
10.04 March 28th Daily Build = Works unsecured, not with WPA.
With 9.10, I also tried "WICD" network manager, and it too didn't yield any differences.
|
|
| 2010-03-29 05:56:35 |
Jeremy Foshee |
tags |
|
kernel-series-unknown |
|
| 2010-03-31 14:27:36 |
Roasted |
description |
I have a laptop here (Toshiba Satellite L25) with an Atheros 2413 wireless card.
In each version of Ubuntu I tried, I can see the SSID of my wireless out of box. However, when trying to connect, I get the following:
8.04.4 = Works with WPA.
9.04 = Works with WPA.
9.10 = Works unsecured, not with WPA.
10.04 March 28th Daily Build = Works unsecured, not with WPA.
With 9.10, I also tried "WICD" network manager, and it too didn't yield any differences.
|
I have a laptop here (Toshiba Satellite L25) with an Atheros 2413 wireless card.
In each version of Ubuntu I tried, I can see the SSID of my wireless out of box. However, when trying to connect, I get the following:
8.04.4 = Works with WPA.
9.04 = Works with WPA.
9.10 = Works unsecured, not with WPA.
10.04 March 28th Daily Build = Works unsecured, not with WPA.
With 9.10, I also tried "WICD" network manager, and it too didn't yield any differences.
EDIT - when working with 8.04.4, 9.04, and 9.10, they were as updated as humanly possible as of March 28th. In each instance, they had the newest kernel possible. |
|
| 2010-04-28 00:34:55 |
Jeremy Foshee |
tags |
kernel-series-unknown |
kernel-series-unknown needs-kernel-logs |
|
| 2010-04-28 00:35:00 |
Jeremy Foshee |
tags |
kernel-series-unknown needs-kernel-logs |
kernel-series-unknown needs-kernel-logs needs-upstream-testing |
|
| 2010-04-28 00:35:07 |
Jeremy Foshee |
tags |
kernel-series-unknown needs-kernel-logs needs-upstream-testing |
kernel-series-unknown kj-triage needs-kernel-logs needs-upstream-testing |
|
| 2010-04-28 00:35:18 |
Jeremy Foshee |
linux (Ubuntu): status |
New |
Incomplete |
|
| 2010-04-28 03:57:18 |
Roasted |
tags |
kernel-series-unknown kj-triage needs-kernel-logs needs-upstream-testing |
apport-collected kernel-series-unknown kj-triage needs-kernel-logs needs-upstream-testing |
|
| 2010-04-28 05:02:12 |
Jeremy Foshee |
tags |
apport-collected kernel-series-unknown kj-triage needs-kernel-logs needs-upstream-testing |
kj-triage lucid needs-kernel-logs needs-upstream-testing |
|
| 2010-08-12 17:32:42 |
Jeremy Foshee |
tags |
kj-triage lucid needs-kernel-logs needs-upstream-testing |
kj-expired kj-triage lucid needs-kernel-logs needs-upstream-testing |
|
| 2010-08-12 17:32:46 |
Jeremy Foshee |
linux (Ubuntu): status |
Incomplete |
Expired |
|
