No, I think it was reverted because of http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20520 (mentioned on http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12950, which is linked to by this bug).
For me it was also a performance regression, so I also reverted to .40 and put a hold on the package.
No, I think it was reverted because of http:// bugs.freedeskto p.org/show_ bug.cgi? id=20520 (mentioned on http:// bugzilla. kernel. org/show_ bug.cgi? id=12950, which is linked to by this bug).
For me it was also a performance regression, so I also reverted to .40 and put a hold on the package.