Comment 2 for bug 1709123

Jeff,

Thanks for testing and for the positive results from the PPA kernel.
ccing the bug.

Regards
Manoj Iyer

On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Jeff Hugo <email address hidden>
wrote:
> I tested the kernel from
> https://launchpad.net/~centriq-team/+archive/ubuntu/lp1709123 on a
> device which reproduced the issue 100% of the time in the first two
> reboots of reboot stress testing. The SRU kernel was stable after 20
> reboots in a row. The SRU is validated. Boot log snippet showing
> the kernel that was booted:
>
> [ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
> [ 0.000000] Linux version 4.10.0-30-generic
> (buildd@bos01-arm64-043) (gcc version 5.4.0 20160609 (Ubuntu/Linaro
> 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4) ) #34~lp709123+build.1-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 7
> 18:13:24 UTC 2017 (Ubuntu 4.10.0-30.34~lp709123+build.1-generic
> 4.10.17)
> [ 0.000000] Boot CPU: AArch64 Processor [510f8000]
>
> Jeffrey Hugo
> Senior Engineer
> Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc.
> 1-303-247-5002
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: <email address hidden>
> [mailto:<email address hidden>] On Behalf Of
> Timur Tabi
> Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 12:49 PM
> To: Manoj Iyer <email address hidden>
> Cc: <email address hidden>
> Subject: Re: regarding Pl011 patch for public bug# 1709123
>
> On 08/07/2017 12:01 PM, Manoj Iyer wrote:
>> Timur,
>>
>> Couple things wrt https://launchpad.net/bugs/1709123,
>>
>> 1. I backported your pl011 patch to 4.10, is there any additional
>> patch that I need to pull in for 4.10?
>>
>> backported from linux-next commit
>> 37ef38f3f83891a2f413fb872bae7d0f9bb95b27 tty: pl011: fix
>> initialization order of QDF2400 E44
>
> I presume you already have these:
>
> tty: pl011: fix earlycon work-around for QDF2400 erratum 44
> tty: pl011: use "qdf2400_e44" as the earlycon name for QDF2400 E44
>
>> 2. I will get a kernel built today, and post a request to test on
>> the
>> public bug. Would you be able to verify that on a system with the FW
>> HW configuration that it is known to fail and report back your test
>> results in the bug ref? so that I can submit the SRU ?
>
> Sure.
>
> --
> Bandera-external mailing list
> <email address hidden>
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.canonical.com/mailman/listinfo/bandera-external
>